Sponsored By

Ofcom proves you can't reason with 5G conspiracy nuts

The UK telecom regulator fails at a well-intentioned effort to engage with lunatics. It should not have bothered.

Iain Morris

April 17, 2020

3 Min Read
Ofcom proves you can't reason with 5G conspiracy nuts

Ofcom, the UK telecom regulator, has tried to clear up the myth that 5G causes coronavirus – by, er, showing that it's not carcinogenic.

The well-intentioned effort to prove 5G is not a virus risk stumbles into a major non sequitur after several paragraphs, when Ofcom starts talking about safe radiation levels.

In so-called "ionizing" spectrum bands, radiation is a potential cancer risk. That's why hospital units that store CT scanners feature those nasty little hazard symbols that resemble either a rotating fan or a Scream mask, depending on how much you've had to drink.

For years, some people have worried that mobile networks could be similarly risky because they also use electromagnetic spectrum. While the concern is understandable, radiation is not dangerous to people unless it is ionizing. Anything below 30PHz is considered non-ionizing, and mobile technology won't even make it past the 70GHz range in future applications. It's about as far removed from the danger zone as the generals were at the Somme.

Figure 1: Clearing up the rumors. Click here for a larger version of this image. (Source: Ofcom) Clearing up the rumors. Click here for a larger version of this image.
(Source: Ofcom)

None of this, however, has even the slightest connection to COVID-19. That, as scientists have made clear, is a virus, a parasitic biological entity that can be transferred between flesh-and-blood hosts. It has as much to do with electromagnetic radiation as the moon does with cheese.

Ofcom might have just said that. Instead, it looks like it succumbed to pressure to reason with the 5G conspiracy theorists – and then discovered there is nothing reasonable to say.

The entire issue has become a farce. Stopping the spread of misinformation and the burning of telecom masts is obviously an industry priority. But trying to explain why 5G does not cause the coronavirus just gives the lunatics and vandals some kind of validation. It's like arguing with someone who believes in alien abduction or black magic. Would anyone bother?

Want to know more about 5G? Check out our dedicated 5G content channel here on
Light Reading.

Other than catching the miscreants, the only way to fight these morons is to show why telecom is so important during the pandemic, and there Ofcom has more success. If masts don't work, people can't call emergency services, it rightly points out. They can't use WhatsApp-based community networks to organize food collections for those in self-isolation.

Nick Jeffery, the CEO of Vodafone UK, also has the right approach: "It's heart-rending enough that families cannot be there at the bedside of loved ones who are critically ill. It's even more upsetting that even the small solace of a phone or video call may now be denied them because of the selfish actions of a few deluded conspiracy theorists," he wrote in a recent LinkedIn post.

Worryingly, the attacks on masts have continued, and not just in the UK. What's more, Ofcom surveys show that misleading information about 5G was seen by half of all respondents last week, up from 46% during the first week of the lockdown.

For most people, fortunately, social media posts about plague-spreading 5G equipment are as idiotic as the local weirdo gibbering about his interstellar trip to Planet Zarg. Ofcom should treat them in the same way.

Related posts:

— Iain Morris, International Editor, Light Reading

Read more about:


About the Author(s)

Iain Morris

International Editor, Light Reading

Iain Morris joined Light Reading as News Editor at the start of 2015 -- and we mean, right at the start. His friends and family were still singing Auld Lang Syne as Iain started sourcing New Year's Eve UK mobile network congestion statistics. Prior to boosting Light Reading's UK-based editorial team numbers (he is based in London, south of the river), Iain was a successful freelance writer and editor who had been covering the telecoms sector for the past 15 years. His work has appeared in publications including The Economist (classy!) and The Observer, besides a variety of trade and business journals. He was previously the lead telecoms analyst for the Economist Intelligence Unit, and before that worked as a features editor at Telecommunications magazine. Iain started out in telecoms as an editor at consulting and market-research company Analysys (now Analysys Mason).

Subscribe and receive the latest news from the industry.
Join 62,000+ members. Yes it's completely free.

You May Also Like