Make IMS simple

Operators need a radically simpler way to provide voice core networks. #sponsored

Gabriel Brown, Principal Analyst, Heavy Reading

September 12, 2022

4 Min Read
Make IMS simple

The IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS) is not perfect by any means, but it is widely deployed and used by billions of customers. Now that the technology is mature, it is time to radically simplify the deployment and operations model for IMS core networks.

In mobile networks, IMS-based voice over LTE (VoLTE) is the main mode of mobile telephony. It counts over 3 billion connections globally, according to the GSM Association, and is forecast to increase to 5 billion 4G/5G connections by 2025.

In advanced markets, 2G/3G switch-off is now the major driver for VoLTE. US operators have led the way in showing how VoLTE can work reliably at scale. They are rapidly closing down 2G/3G networks and reaping the benefits by refarming spectrum for 4G/5G. European operators have not been quite as forward-thinking. They were arguably too slow to mandate VoLTE on 4G devices and are now paying for it by having to support legacy phones and maintain older networks for longer.* In hindsight, they should have been more ambitious, but they are now moving quickly.

*An important side note: IMS device support is one of the reasons some inbound roamers to the US now find they cannot make carrier voice calls, which has serious and urgent implications for emergency calling.

In the meantime, we are seeing the first voice over 5G New Radio (VoNR) services go live. There are 16 operators that have publicly announced they are investing in VoNR, according to the Global mobile Suppliers Association (GSA, October 2021). And this number is set to increase, particularly in countries where low band spectrum is dedicated to 5G. The key point is that VoNR uses the same IMS core as VoLTE, meaning this infrastructure will be around for a long time. In less mature markets, there are still hundreds of operators and billions of subscribers that are reliant on 2G/3G voice. In time, these operators will also need to migrate, with a cost model scaled to their market context and revenue per user.

All these points underline that IMS voice is an essential part of the mobile service offer. Even if you use them infrequently, you would not want a phone that does not make calls or texts.

The challenge, however, is that voice generates little direct revenue – it is a cost center. Even the most basic pay monthly plans or data passes you buy at a kiosk or online now often come with unlimited voice and text included.

For a service that does not generate much revenue but remains essential, the obvious analysis is that operators need a much lower cost IMS core infrastructure.

Achieving this will take some fresh thinking. This IMS architecture was designed in the early 2000s and is over-complicated – with too many discrete functions and interfaces to be easy and simple to manage (yes, we knew this at the time; back in 2004, I published this report). Now that the technology is mature, the time has come to simplify IMS and optimize it for cost.

There are two main options:

  • 1) Move to single-vendor, cloud native IMS core at refresh time. This model allows the vendor to pre-integrate functions, internalize interfaces and manage the entire core as a single entity. Doing this in a "cloud native" manner should allow for the use of the latest automation and lifecycle management tools. And even if single-vendor is not practical in one step, consolidating suppliers can nevertheless have a major impact on operating costs. (For more on this, see this recent Light Reading-hosted webinar, "Voice services just got a whole lot simpler").

    2) Move to an IMS as a service model. Already used by smaller fixed line operators, there is no fundamental reason mobile operators should not adopt the as-a-service model for mobile voice. Yes, there are regulatory hurdles around data privacy, but these are not insurmountable. Cloud providers and IMS system vendors are the obvious providers of this type of service. This model is already in use for rich messaging, so why not voice as well?

And who knows, by making IMS core cloud native, perhaps we can once again start to think about open interfaces and making carrier voice a part of the developer toolkit.

— Gabriel Brown, Senior Principal Analyst – Mobile Networks & 5G, Heavy Reading

This blog is sponsored by Nokia Networks.

Read more about:


About the Author(s)

Gabriel Brown

Principal Analyst, Heavy Reading

Gabriel leads mobile network research for Heavy Reading. His coverage includes system architecture, RAN, core, and service-layer platforms. Key research topics include 5G, open RAN, mobile core, and the application of cloud technologies to wireless networking.

Gabriel has more than 20 years’ experience as a mobile network analyst. Prior to joining Heavy Reading, he was chief analyst for Light Reading’s Insider research service; before that, he was editor of IP Wireline and Wireless Week at London's Euromoney Institutional Investor.

Subscribe and receive the latest news from the industry.
Join 62,000+ members. Yes it's completely free.

You May Also Like