Ciena CEO Gary Smith on Software's Brave New World

The DWDM company has grown into Ethernet networking and now open software architectures. We sat down with CEO Gary Smith to get a fix on Ciena's current identity.

Craig Matsumoto, Editor-in-Chief, Light Reading

January 16, 2018

8 Min Read
Ciena CEO Gary Smith on Software's Brave New World

I got to visit Nortel in Ottawa only after-the-fact. It was 2011, and Ciena had long since completed its acquisition of the Metro Ethernet Networks group, arguably the crown jewel to come out of the Nortel bankruptcy and the source of the packet-optical technology that would become the company's flagship. A Light Reading video crew was invited up for a few days to see some technology and interview a few executives. (See Ciena Goes Terabit.)

That, I believe, is the only time I've spoken with Gary Smith in person. The Ciena CEO has been a Light Reading interviewee many times, but this one was particularly fun -- a video shoot set up in an empty theater at that Nortel campus.

Figure 1: Ciena CEO Gary Smith Ciena CEO Gary Smith

The world moved on, of course. Ciena put a new coat of paint on the place, and the 2015 acquisition of Cyan has given the company a software play at the intersection of NFV and network automation. (See Ciena's Cyan Buy: It's All About the Software.)

Celebrating its 25th birthday last year, Ciena was in the mood to parade Smith to the media just after the company announced earnings in December. I thought it would be a good chance to let him have a victory lap for that Nortel deal, but we also talked about what Ciena has become and what carriers can expect to do with all this software, automation and openness that's swirling around them.

Craig Matsumoto: So at this point, I think we can say the Nortel deal went well.

Gary Smith: Listen, it was a good fit both culturally and from a customer point of view and from a technology perspective. It's just been a great combo for us and a super set of people who were looking for a home to focus on their stuff.

It also gave us global scale, which is what we needed. We were a focused technology player then, and we really needed to broaden out. That's really what it gave us -- footprint.

When you look at the M&A activities in our broad space, there aren't many you can point to that have been successful. Seems a long time ago now. It's a brave new world now.

CM: Let's talk about that brave new world. With Blue Planet and all, how do you define Ciena now?

GS: At the heart of it, our focus used to be being the best in the world at moving optical bits. That's not changed. The world still needs to move optical bits, and I think the demand for that will continue to be strong, with the densification of fiber closer to the customer. That's the bedrock of it.

The second element is really: How can we automate those bits? Ciena looks at all the traffic flows. We see the mix of it all. So, we should be really well placed to deliver proactive analytics and network intelligence and an autonomous network.

CM: Blue Planet's been around for a while. I think it was unique when I first heard about it from Cyan; now there are lots of people talking about multivendor automation capabilities. How would you gauge the competition nowadays?

GS: The whole market has sort of evolved. When we entered into this two to three years ago, it was incredibly nascent and everyone was talking about SDN and NFV and virtualization. I think our learning is this: All of those things are actually going to happen and are happening, but the evolution of the ecosystem to be able to fully facilitate it -- to deliver at scale virtual services, outside of things like SD-WAN and things like that -- that is not fully mature yet.

The more pressing need is just to automate the existing processes and services. Our focus is really around providing a DevOps platform with open APIs and a DevOps toolkit and network analytics, really targeted at that automation piece.

CM: How big a role will open source software have here?

GS: It absolutely has a role to play. I think it varies. I think the issue with open source software is that you have to put it in the network and make it work. That's the challenge. You need folks to be able to do that. We're big fans of open source and an open architecture and programmable networking, but if you're a service provider, you've got to make that work in your network.

I think the shift is away from closed architecture, where you've got a single vendor writing all the software for you if you want to make a change. We're in an environment that's a very open architecture, and maybe the service provider is providing some of the software You've got open source, you've got Blue Planet as a domain manager, you've got network analytics, and how you pull all of that together is what I think the service providers are challenged with.

CM: The other new-age thing you've been working on is the programmable optical network. Let's talk about that.

GS: The first iteration of that is the combination of WaveLogic Ai technology and Blue Planet. When you combine that with a programmable line system, you get what we call Liquid Spectrum. For the first time, you get true programmability on the optical bits, with open automation software.

CM: How prepared are service providers for that degree of programmability? Granted, some are very, very prepared, but what about the mainstream?

When you go and talk to any of the executives, that's absolutely what they want -- the programmable network, with parameters you can control. The issue is: How do you actually deploy that? With WaveLogic Ai and the line systems, you can get that out into the field, but the issue is how you manage that from a software point of view. You look at the back office of most of the carriers, and it's not capable of managing that. That's where the Blue Planet domain comes in.

The real challenge is around how the carrier puts these elements together. It's a non-trivial thing for the carrier.

CM: Is it realistic to think that vendors like yourselves might become systems integrators, then?

GS: If you think about what we do now, you could say that we are systems integrators now on the optical side. What we're talking about with Blue Planet is extending that into being a systems integrator around automating a DevOps open-architecture platform on the software side. Said differently, you've got to wrap services around that, because from a software point of view, you've got to focus on an outcome for the customer, as opposed to, "Hey, here's a big piece of software. Go figure it out."

CM: That matches a lot of what I'm hearing, where the general approach is going to be about the outcome and not the next-faster level of technology.

GS: Yeah. The problem is that the carriers have this closed, locked back-office system that is proprietary. Typically, some large vendor has got them locked in, and they want to break out of that. If they're going to realize an open architecture that is programmable, etc., it's got to be a confluence of capabilities, very much embedded in a DevOps model. One of the challenges is that the operational side of the service providers, generally, doesn't have a lot of experience in a DevOps model.

Now, the IT side of the service provider does, in its CRM systems, etc. But the challenge is how you get that operational piece, in a DevOps environment, focused on outcomes. One of the opportunities we are focused on with Blue Planet is helping the service providers get to that outcome -- getting that software ecosystem focused on an outcome.

CM: A lot of the requirements we talk about -- DevOps, openness -- are really coming from the web-scale cloud guys. It sometimes feels like we're letting them define product strategy for the telcos, and I'm wondering if that's healthy.

GS: I don't so much think of it as "web-scale." Where a lot of this software approach and learning is coming from is the enterprise and data center. The challenge for the carriers is: How do they take those pieces and deploy and interpret them in a way that makes sense for their environment. And there are differences.

One of the biggest is: If you think about a data center environment or a web-scale environment, it's a very concentrated, at-scale environment. Carrier networks are entirely the opposite. They're distributed, by their very nature. And so, you've got this dichotomy: How do you take the learnings on the data center side, which provided things like white box, and deploy them in a very, very different environment, where it's completely distributed? I'm being sort of extreme here, but if I were to draw a contrast, that, I think, is the challenge of the carriers, and in many ways, Blue Planet and other elements like it are helping them make that transition.

CM: How about open source?

GS: A lot of the major carriers around the world simply don't have the resources to re-aggregate or embed open-architecture stuff. It's really around your point about systems integrators again. You see carriers saying: "I just want it all converged, and I want you to go deliver it, because we don't have the resources to do it. The economics and operational challenges are not worth us spending time to make sure it's all open sourced."

— Craig Matsumoto, Editor-in-Chief, Light Reading

About the Author(s)

Craig Matsumoto

Editor-in-Chief, Light Reading

Yes, THAT Craig Matsumoto – who used to be at Light Reading from 2002 until 2013 and then went away and did other stuff and now HE'S BACK! As Editor-in-Chief. Go Craig!!

Subscribe and receive the latest news from the industry.
Join 62,000+ members. Yes it's completely free.

You May Also Like