Apple, Samsung Phones Pass FCC's Radiation Tests

A report last year from the Chicago Tribune raised concerns that common smartphones were blasting RF radiation over the legal limit. But FCC tests found that they were not.

Mike Dano, Editorial Director, 5G & Mobile Strategies

January 10, 2020

2 Min Read
Apple, Samsung Phones Pass FCC's Radiation Tests

A report last year from the Chicago Tribune found that mobile phones from Apple, Samsung and others produced radio frequency (RF) radiation exposure above the FCC's legal limits. Not surprisingly, the report raised concerns that common smartphones like the iPhone 7 might pose some kind of health hazard.

So the FCC responded. Late last year, the agency conducted its own tests to determine whether the phones in question were in fact blasting radiation above the agency's prescribed limit.

The result? "All tested sample devices comply with the FCC RF radiation exposure general population/uncontrolled limits for peak spatial-average SAR [specific absorption rate] of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over any 1 gram of tissue as specified in 47 CFR § 2.1093(d)(2), and these tests did not produce evidence of violations of any FCC rules regarding maximum RF exposure levels," the FCC wrote in its report, issued last month and highlighted by Wireless Estimator.

Meaning, the FCC found that the phones were behaving in accordance with the government's radiation guidelines.

Why this matters
The initial Chicago Tribune report in August helped to rekindle long-simmering fears that cellphones cause cancer. Those concerns have dogged the wireless industry for decades, but have been re-energized in recent years by the industry's move to 5G technology alongside operators' efforts to deploy small cells in neighborhoods around the country.

Citing data from the Food and Drug Administration's Center for Devices and Radiological Health, among other sources, the FCC has been very clear that 5G, small cells and cellphones in general do not pose a health risk. Indeed, the agency last year said it will not change its existing RF exposure limits, arguing that such limits are already among the most stringent in the world.

As for the Chicago Tribune's findings specifically, the publication noted that the FCC used test software, RF cables and other accessories that were supplied by the smartphone vendors. "Such software was unavailable to the Tribune's lab when testing Apple phones," the publication noted.

The Tribune's tests last year were conducted by the RF Exposure Lab in San Marcos, Calif., which the publication said is recognized by the FCC as accredited to test for RF radiation from electronic devices and has been doing so for wireless companies for 15 years.

For its own tests, the FCC said "a robotically positioned probe takes a series of measurements of the electric field (proportional to SAR) at specific pinpoint locations in a very precise, grid-like pattern within the head and torso models. All data for each cell phone placement is submitted as a part of the equipment approval test report for final authorization," among other technical specifics.

"The FCC takes claims of non-compliance with its regulations seriously," the agency noted.

Mike Dano, Editorial Director, 5G & Mobile Strategies, Light Reading | @mikeddano

About the Author(s)

Mike Dano

Editorial Director, 5G & Mobile Strategies, Light Reading

Mike Dano is Light Reading's Editorial Director, 5G & Mobile Strategies. Mike can be reached at [email protected], @mikeddano or on LinkedIn.

Based in Denver, Mike has covered the wireless industry as a journalist for almost two decades, first at RCR Wireless News and then at FierceWireless and recalls once writing a story about the transition from black and white to color screens on cell phones.

Subscribe and receive the latest news from the industry.
Join 62,000+ members. Yes it's completely free.

You May Also Like