& cplSiteName &

IBM, Microsoft Duke It Out Over Chief Diversity Hire

Sarah Thomas
2/15/2018
50%
50%

IBM has filed suit against Microsoft for hiring away its Chief Diversity Officer Lindsay-Rae McIntyre, alleging it violates a non-compete agreement. The resulting war of words between the two companies raises an interesting question: Should improving diversity be a proprietary process?

Seems disingenuous to me. Here's what Axios reports IBM Corp. (NYSE: IBM) had to say, as it threw some shade over the hire:

"As IBM's chief diversity officer, Lindsay-Rae McIntyre was at the center of highly confidential and competitively sensitive information that has fueled IBM's success in these areas. While we can appreciate Microsoft's need to deal with mounting criticism of its record on diversity, IBM intends to fully enforce Lindsay-Rae's non-compete agreement -- just like we do with all of our senior leaders -- to protect our competitive information."

Microsoft Corp. (Nasdaq: MSFT) responded that it has "no interest in any of IBM's confidential information."


We believe the rising tide lifts all ships! Join Women in Comms for an important morning of networking and discussion at our annual WiC networking breakfast event in Denver on March 22. Let's put an end to sexual harassment in the workplace. There's still time to register for this free event!


Let's be clear, the entire tech industry has a problem with diversity and inclusion and fixing it should be a priority for all. So, shouldn't we all be sharing our best practices and helping each other improve the problem? It's not a competition; it's a "rising tide lifts all ships" scenario more than anything. McIntyre said as much in her court documents response to the lawsuit.

Apparently, Axios notes, that IBM is calling Microsoft out for arguing in previous court cases that its diversity data and methods were proprietary and should be kept out of public view.

First of all, I don't think any company in tech is excelling at diversity and inclusion. There are still rampant issues and large companies, including IBM, still have plenty of work to do. But, the bigger issue is, why would any company want to keep their successful diversity strategies a secret? That doesn't help anyone and only adds to the bigger problem.

This will be an interesting lawsuit to watch unfold. The ruling will be interesting, but I also hope IBM's diversity "secrets" are unveiled in the process.

— Sarah Thomas, Director, Women in Comms

(5)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
Phil_Britt
50%
50%
Phil_Britt,
User Rank: Light Sabre
2/19/2018 | 11:51:17 AM
Re: Wonder how long its for
Some non-compete clauses can be ridiculously restricting. Of course, the person signing it should read it (or have a lawyer read it) so he or she knows what they are getting into. Unfortunately, if the company with the contract wants to be unrelenting, there's not much the person (or the other lawyers) can do.
Duh!
50%
50%
Duh!,
User Rank: Blogger
2/16/2018 | 10:36:27 AM
Re: loopy lawsuit
Lawyers will be lawyers. It's what they do. How much of a real threat this is to IBM's business is quite beside the point.

HR execs are ordinarily generous in sharing best practices. Check out any of their trade rags or conference programs.
jerehada
50%
50%
jerehada,
User Rank: Light Beer
2/16/2018 | 9:31:05 AM
Wonder how long its for
But the question is about a non compete clause not her role in diveristy. Should diversity leaders be afforded different rights to spread the good work? Don't think so.
Heleeess
50%
50%
Heleeess,
User Rank: Light Beer
2/16/2018 | 7:13:39 AM
Interesting
Well, it may be an interesting collaboration. I am looking forward for effects!
Sarah Thomas
50%
50%
Sarah Thomas,
User Rank: Blogger
2/15/2018 | 2:05:08 PM
loopy lawsuit
This lawsuit seems so strange to me. It's not uncommon to sue over non-compete clauses related to employment, but they're actually alleging she'll reveal their diversity initiatives. How can they claim an authentic commitment to diversity if they aren't even willing to share how they accomplish it? Doesn't reflect well on them. 
More Blogs from Que Sera Sarah
Congratulations to AT&T's Anne Chow, CableLab's Dr. Jennifer Andreoli-Fang and Movandi's Maryam Rofougaran, our 2018 WiC Leading Lights winners.
Heavy hitters in cable, open source and optical networking make up the five women who are shortlisted for the Hedy Lamarr-inspired Female Tech Pioneer of the Year category.
Four worthy women from the worlds of cable, the enterprise, data centers and B/OSS make our shortlist for the year's Most Inspiring Woman in Comms.
Libelium and Movandi and their founders are pioneering new technologies that are already changing the game for IoT and 5G, respectively, making them startups you want to keep an eye on in 2018 and beyond.
Ten worthy women and two trailblazing startups made the shortlist this year for Women in Comms' Leading Lights awards. Winners will be unveiled soon at BCE.
Featured Video
Flash Poll
Upcoming Live Events
March 12-14, 2019, Denver, Colorado
April 2, 2019, New York, New York
April 8, 2019, Las Vegas, Nevada
May 6, 2019, Denver, Colorado
May 6-8, 2019, Denver, Colorado
May 21, 2019, Nice, France
September 17-19, 2019, Dallas, Texas
October 1, 2019, New Orleans, Louisiana
October 10, 2019, New York, New York
November 5, 2019, London, England
December 3, 2019, New York, New York
December 3-5, 2019, Vienna, Austria
All Upcoming Live Events