Net Neutrality

Verizon CFO Slams Title II Regs for ISPs

Verizon CFO Fran Shammo wants everyone to know that he thinks any proposal to impose utility-style regulations on ISPs is a really bad idea.

Speaking on Verizon Communications Inc. (NYSE: VZ)'s fourth-quarter earnings call Thursday morning, Shammo ripped into the idea of reclassifying ISPs under the much stricter Title II of the Communications Act. Calling it "an extremely risky path that will jeopardize" the future of broadband in the US, he said the adoption of Title II regulations would "completely change the way we view our investments in our networks," as well as the way other broadband providers view theirs.

"This will absolutely affect us and the rest of the industry," he said, in response to an analyst question near the end of the earnings call. Without naming nations, he contended that similar tighter regulation of ISPs in other parts of the world has stymied private investment in broadband networks, placing them well behind the US.

Seeking to clarify earlier remarks in which he seemed to downplay the impact of Title II, Shammo said he only meant then that any reclassification would not affect Verizon's network investment plans for 2015, which are already set. But, he said, the impact would definitely be felt after hat.

For the latest on broadband networks, visit Light Reading's dedicated Gigabit Cities content channel. And watch for forthcoming details on Light Reading's Gigabit Cities Live event, to be held in May 2015 in Atlanta.

Taking on President Obama's publicly stated support of Title II directly, Shammo slammed the idea of including such regulatory treatment of broadband in the president's new "middle-class economics" agenda for the nation. The Verizon CFO argued that the imposition of Title II rules would eventually hurt the middle-class by leading to job layoffs and small-business failures. "This will definitely trickle down to middle-class jobs," he said. (See Obama Skips New Broadband Mandates.)

In addition, Shammo warned that any attempt to impose Title II rules would "tie up the industry" in prolonged regulatory battles and lead to more lawsuits against the federal government. In the last regulatory fight over net neutrality rules for the Internet, Verizon led the legal charge against the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) , eventually overturning those rules in the federal courts. The company also threatened to sue again last year if the federal government went ahead with the proposed Title II reclassification. (See Sprint CTO Blesses a Light Touch of Title II.)

— Alan Breznick, Cable/Video Practice Leader, Light Reading

KBode 1/23/2015 | 3:09:48 PM
Re: I guess nobody asked... Yes, they already froze fixed-line investment.

Note we're to ignore that FiOS and wireless voice were regulated under Title II with no significant impact on investment. We're also to ignore that the sector just spent $45 billion on spectrum despite the looming spectre of Title II based rules, so...
gconnery 1/22/2015 | 5:18:03 PM
I guess nobody asked... If they maybe shouldn't have sued the government over the Net Neutrality rules in the first place, since this is the outcome?  Huh?

Or how about the fact the Verizon is *not* investing heavily in broadband anyway?  You know they capped their footprint and haven't ventured forth for a few years now?  What investment is there to stymie?
Sign In