Global Crossing: Telecom's Enron?

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- With the Enron Corp. (NYSE: ENE) scandal slapped on the front page of most major newspapers every day, the bankruptcy of Global Crossing Ltd. (NYSE: GX), a large next-generation carrier, has ignited emotions in the telecom industry (see Global Crossing Falls Overboard).

Just days after the filing was announced, attendees at the Comnet tradeshow in Washington expressed disgust but a lack of surprise at the news.

“It’s another Enron,” says Alex Jordan who was at the show representing his company, Advanced Research Diagnostic Systems. “They’re a fraud. They were spending money like drunken sailors without any purchase orders. It was mismanagement -- period.”

"I'm used to all these bankruptcies by now," says Joseph Samuel, a sales manager for Optical Cable Corp. "The fact of the matter is that they were selling products without customers. Companies like Global Crossing are running fiber for customers that don’t exist yet."

But some viewed such comparisons as extreme, and customers hoped the product would continue to be delivered. John Perseo, a senior LAN administrator for Netcom Solutions International, says his company has been pleased with the T1 service it has gotten from Global Crossing:

“To be honest, it’s been a lot easier dealing with them than some of the other incumbent providers around. We’re keeping our fingers crossed that the service continues.”

Those suffering most from the Global Crossing bankruptcy will be equity investors and the company’s creditors. Included in that list are some of the most prominent names in the networking and service provider world.

For example, Lucent Technologies Inc. (NYSE: LU) is owed roughly $31.3 million, Alcatel SA (NYSE: ALA; Paris: CGEP:PA) $31.0 million, Nortel Networks Corp. (NYSE/Toronto: NT) $13.8 million, Cisco Systems Inc. (Nasdaq: CSCO) $12.6 million, and Juniper Networks Inc. (Nasdaq: JNPR) $3.6 million.

And then there are the service providers, which combined are owed over $40 million. Level 3 Communications Inc. (Nasdaq: LVLT), itself in precarious financial trouble, is the most exposed. Global Crossing owes it $10.1 million. The list goes on to include other big-name carriers, including AT&T Corp. (NYSE: T), Bell Atlantic, BellSouth Corp. (NYSE: BLS), MCI Telecommunications, Qwest Communications International Inc. (NYSE: Q), SBC Communications Inc. (NYSE: SBC), and Sprint Corp. (NYSE: FON).

So what happened to Global Crossing?

Its plan was to construct a worldwide fiber optic network to provide managed broadband services to global enterprises and carriers. This high-capacity IP network would enable Global Crossing to offer managed IP services, Internet access, data, and voice services to telecommunications carriers and business customers on a cost-effective basis.

After more than four years of construction and billions of dollars of spending, the network is now 85 percent complete, with about 100,000 miles of cable installed throughout the world. Global Crossing installed 75,000 miles itself and acquired the remaining 25,000 miles through acquisitions.

The company’s crowning glory is the 13,200-mile subsea transatlantic cable network that connects the U.S. to Europe. It also has laid 20,000 miles of terrestrial cable across North America; 11,000 miles across continental Europe, and another 13,000 miles under the Pacific to connect the U.S. to Asia, plus many other routes in Central and South America.

Except for the East Asia Crossing Phase II, all the segments are finished and in service. East Asia Phase II -- which spans from Japan to Malaysia, the Philippines, and Singapore -- is expected to be fully complete in the first quarter of 2002.

But Global Crossing’s dream has been an expensive one to fulfill. In the beginning, it seemed that the equity and debt markets understood this “build it and they will come” attitude, as evidenced by the billions of dollars they were throwing at the company.

And then the recession hit. Saddled with over $12 billion in debt and other commitments, the company has been unable to sign up enough customers to build its revenue to a break-even level. The financial collapse of many of its service provider customers has certainly affected its bottom line. What’s more, a skittish investment community has essentially slammed the door on further funding.

Hutchison Whampoa Ltd. and Singapore Technologies Telemedia Pte. Ltd. are jumping in to acquire the assets in what appears to be a fire sale.

As for what will happen next, it's really anyone’s guess. Other carriers, like Deutsche Telekom AG (NYSE: DT), SBC, or WorldCom Inc. (Nasdaq: WCOM), could swoop in and make their own offers for the company. Also, the deal presented by Hutchison Whampoa and Singapore Technologies could be rejected by antitrust investigators. One investment bank analyst interviewed at the Comnet show, who asked not to be named, said all of the above is possible.

“Bondholders and equity investors will definitely get smacked,” he says. “But I’m just not sure what will happen here. It’s far from being over and still very unclear.”

— Marguerite Reardon, Senior Editor, Light Reading
Page 1 / 4   >   >>
dc_optics 12/4/2012 | 11:00:09 PM
re: Global Crossing: Telecom's Enron? Just like Enron the execs at Global Crossing got rich while the rest of the people got bent over. Hell, they didn't even get kissed. The CEO of Global Crossing is the biggest cheat.
photonsu 12/4/2012 | 11:00:08 PM
re: Global Crossing: Telecom's Enron? If we could get someone to build the FTTH network and fail, we could write that off and get cheaper broadband rates in exchange, in this country at least!
hyperunner 12/4/2012 | 11:00:00 PM
re: Global Crossing: Telecom's Enron? photonsu wrote:

If we could get someone to build the FTTH network and fail, we could write that off and get cheaper broadband rates in exchange, in this country at least!


I'd vote for that one, photonsu...but not with my pocket book ;-)

Remember those Cisco presentations from a couple of years ago that promised bandwidth would be infinite and free. I guess the price come down pretty low in a fire sale!

It's kind of frustrating that mis-management of business plans like these on a massive scale will set back the "broadband everywhere" clock a few years.


jimbo59 12/4/2012 | 10:59:58 PM
re: Global Crossing: Telecom's Enron? erp, make that multiplier 4!!
jimbo59 12/4/2012 | 10:59:58 PM
re: Global Crossing: Telecom's Enron?
GC owes LU $31M? Think again! Multiply by 3 and you're close to right! Good thing LU's CFO has a surplus fallback for events like this...

HiTekRedNeck 12/4/2012 | 10:59:53 PM
re: Global Crossing: Telecom's Enron? Jimbo:

LU has been paying dearly for literally giving equipment away... 1999-2000 they (as did Nortel) took a huge beating from the CLECs defaulting.

My last challenge I worked on the Nortel GX account team. Many of us saw (GX bankrupcy) coming just prior to 9/11. After 9/11, their customer base was decimated and it just spirialed from there. We knew it was "publish or perish" by Q3/01 for GX and their execs. knew it too. Several folks on the account team and indirect supports where scrambling to find another home.

And so here I am (like many others)... Looking for my next challenge.

Good messages.

steve 12/4/2012 | 10:59:50 PM
re: Global Crossing: Telecom's Enron? LR is guilty of some National Enquire like reporting here - to compare Enron to Global Crossing is very irresponsible - at least at this point. It would appear that Enron is guilty of some egregious accounting gimmickry at best and criminal liability at worst. It would appear that (at least from what we know now) all that GXC is guilty of is drinking from the same kool-aid container that we were all drinking from. Get your act together LR and be more responsible!
LightMan 12/4/2012 | 10:59:48 PM
re: Global Crossing: Telecom's Enron? To LR's credit, there are indications of gov't involvement and reports of questionable accounting practices. Given the fact that they also use the same accounting firm should further help raise all but the densest heads from the sand.

The fact that it is going to force some optical companies to make bad-debt write offs on top of reducing the number of already limited number of prospects for these venders, makes it worthwhile LR fodder. IMHO.


temporary 12/4/2012 | 10:59:42 PM
re: Global Crossing: Telecom's Enron? Well, in fact ENRON was run by crooks, however, they did blow about a billion in broadband wide area networking just like Global.

I worked a little bit with both companies in looking a new broadband applications, and as of Feb, 2001, they were both sounding like broadband WAN fiber was an important part of their business.
steve 12/4/2012 | 10:59:39 PM
re: Global Crossing: Telecom's Enron? btw, if you get your information from the Drudge Report you should also try card readings, seances and cave paintings for guidance
Page 1 / 4   >   >>
Sign In