Subscribe and receive the latest news from the industry.
Join 62,000+ members. Yes it's completely free.
AT&T's Lightspeed has some high-def issues
May 26, 2006
1:00 PM – Like an HDTV picture itself, AT&T Inc. (NYSE: T)'s broadband access challenges are crystal clear.
The company is mostly targeting affluent consumers with its Project Lightspeed rollout. But the company's U-verse service launched without HDTV channels and the carrier won't say how soon they'll be able to carry HD signals.
And aren't "early adopter" consumers (I'm not referring to Angelina Jolie here) the types that would (1) take a chance on Lightspeed and (2) expect to have HDTV service in more than one room?
Meanwhile, Wall Street analysts are piling on. This week analysts Tom Watts and Shaun Parvez of SG Cowen Securities wrote:
AT&T has reconfirmed its intention to roll out video to 15-20 markets by the end of this year. However, as we understand, these rollouts will have Standard Definition (SD) television only, and will carry no High Definition (HD) programming. Also, we believe AT&T will postpone deployment of video to any additional markets until its architecture can support HD. The primary constraint appears to be the bandwidth achievable using AT&T's FTTN architecture. Many 3,000 foot loops appear inadequate of supporting necessary transmission speeds. Moreover, the initial specifications for the DSLAMs/Edge Routers purchased by AT&T appear inadequate. AT&T may re-open the procurement for network equipment adding higher speed specifications and adding an additional vendor to supplement Alcatel. This would certainly result in capex increases, but would not solve the bandwidth constraints in markets with longer loop lengths. Ultimately, we expect AT&T to move to FTTC or FTTH in at least some of its markets.
Last month, Anton Walhman of ThinkEquity LLC had similar suspicions about AT&T's broadband plans:
Hey, all we're saying about Lightspeed anyway, is that we believe it probably won't happen as planned, with 25 Mb/s VDSL2 to 18 million homes by 2008. Rather, we believe AT&T will first focus massively on HomeZone, rolling it out first in its own territories (roughly a third of America, before buying BellSouth), and then nationwide with the support probably of a WiMax interactive IP pipe, or perhaps even some Covad in certain places. Then, it will have to find a way to crank up those speeds from the tiny 25 Mb/s, perhaps using shorter copper loops but retaining VDSL2 to reach close to 100 Mb/s. AT&T may also wait until the second half of 2007 and do GPON in some areas.
If AT&T were anywhere near succeeding with Lightspeed, why would there be so much sentiment to the contrary?
— Phil Harvey, Lightspeeding Editor, Light Reading
Editor-in-Chief, Light Reading
Phil Harvey has been a Light Reading writer and editor for more than 18 years combined. He began his second tour as the site's chief editor in April 2020.
His interest in speed and scale means he often covers optical networking and the foundational technologies powering the modern Internet.
Harvey covered networking, Internet infrastructure and dot-com mania in the late 90s for Silicon Valley magazines like UPSIDE and Red Herring before joining Light Reading (for the first time) in late 2000.
After moving to the Republic of Texas, Harvey spent eight years as a contributing tech writer for D CEO magazine, producing columns about tech advances in everything from supercomputing to cellphone recycling.
Harvey is an avid photographer and camera collector – if you accept that compulsive shopping and "collecting" are the same.
You May Also Like
Rethinking AIOPs — It's All About the DataMar 12, 2024
SCTE® LiveLearning for Professionals Webinar™ Series: Fiddling with Fixed WirelessMar 21, 2024
SCTE® LiveLearning for Professionals Webinar™ Series: Cable and 5G: The Odd Couple?Apr 18, 2024
SCTE® LiveLearning for Professionals Webinar™ Series: Delivering the DAA DifferenceMay 16, 2024