Japan's operators accused of bait-and-switch with customers
Japanese carriers, though claiming to cut the country's unusually high mobile phone tariffs, have played bait-and-switch with customers, says communications minister Ryota Takeda.
Or as he put it, "they're promising mutton but selling dog."
Japan is not usually known for its bargains, but even so a 20-gigabyte data plan costs more than three times as much in Tokyo than Paris, says the Japanese government.
Reducing the country's mobile phone bills has been a key personal goal of Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga, who became the country's leader in September and currently enjoys 60% popularity levels.
Two years ago, as cabinet secretary, Suga excoriated the high, 20% profit margins of the three largest carriers, KDDI, SoftBank Corp and NTT Docomo, and said their mobile tariffs should be 40% lower.
But carriers have so far only made cuts for their cheaper sub-brands, like UQ (owned by KDDI) and Y! Mobile (owned by SoftBank), leaving their principal offerings, which have more customers, untouched.
KDDI and SoftBank both announced the lower fees for their discount sub-brands on October 28, after pressure from the communications minister.
But their lower tariffs cannot be used on the latest model smartphones. And between 80% and 90% of both KDDI and SoftBank's customers use their mainstream services, and will not benefit from the cuts.
Fetch me a branch manager
Smartphones "are not luxury goods. They are now critical infrastructure for people's lives," said Takeda in September.
Japan's Fair Trade Commission launched a study into possible violations of the country's Anti-Monopoly Law by the three largest mobile phone operators on October 28.
In another attempt to boost competition, Takeda's ministry has proposed scrapping fees to switch mobile phone carriers.
The three largest carriers currently charge 3,0000 yen (US$29) for their customers to use the country's mobile phone portability system to change to a different operator.
The three companies control 90% of Japan's mobile phone market.
And their recent results, showing them among the nation's most profitable public companies, have led to increased criticism that the operators should lower tariffs to more international levels.
In a meeting organized in October by the communications ministry, users told ministers and mobile phone operators that COVID-19 and remote working had caused their mobile phone bills to spike.
Following the increased ministerial and public criticism, NTT Docomo said it would become a 100% subsidiary of its parent firm Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.
Closer collaboration with other firms in the NTT group would allow it to offer cheaper plans, it said.
Getting Tokyo tariffs down is ruff
On the back of the ministerial criticism, sheepish Japanese carriers saw their stock prices fall, KDDI's by 2.3% and SoftBank's by 1.5%.
Online challenger carrier Rakuten, though, saw its stock price shoot up by 4%.
Part of why Japanese mobile tariffs are higher than France's is that its network is slightly better, argues Tokyo-based ICT Research and Consulting.
The average Japanese user is connected to a 4G network 98.5% of the time, compared to 86% of the time for a user in France.
Nevertheless, it looks like the industry has an uphill struggle to convince Japanese customers they're not being fleeced.
- Japan government launches crusade to cut mobile charges
- Rakuten plots global 5G landgrab as Japanese tech strikes back
- Troubled SoftBank Group slices telco stake in SoftBank Corp
- The great 5G slowdown in Asia
- KDDI feels crisis over low 5G adoption
- Ra-Ra Rakuten, lover of the open RAN
— Pádraig Belton, contributing editor special to, Light Reading