Small cells

Towerstream Proposes a Small-Cell Alternative

Will wireless operators be content trading ease of deployment for revenues when it comes to public-access small cells?

Many of the cable operators that already have backhaul in major cities are banking on it, but -- as brought up in a recent Light Reading blog -- the question is, are the operators willing to cede control over owning and running the small cells to the cable providers? (See Small Cells as a Service? Not So Fast, MSOs... and MSOs Poised to Profit from Small Cell Rollouts – Research.)

Those might not be the only two options, according to tower company and broadband provider Towerstream Corp. (Nasdaq: TWER). It has an alternative to offer the wireless operators, and it even spun out a subsidiary, HetNets Tower Corp., last year to market the concept.

Here's the deal: Towerstream already has spent years acquiring real estate in prime locations like New York's Empire State building and MetLife center, a formidable challenge now for network operators. It also already has a high-capacity backhaul network -- with a fixed broadband network to back it up -- in Manhattan and its boroughs and is soon to be in San Francisco, Chicago, Miami, and other urban markets as well. (See Small Cells: The Battle for the Lamp Post, Poll: Backhaul Holds Up City Small Cells, and Towerstream Buys Small Cell & 4G Operator in Houston.)

To leverage this, Arthur Giftakis, VP of engineering and network operations, says the company is ramping up its small-cell play and offering carriers a way to connect on their own terms, leveraging its existing assets and the ability to more easily acquire facilities appropriate for mounting small cells. (See WiFi: Small Cells' Trojan Horse? and Know Your Small Cell: Home, Enterprise, or Public Access?)

"We're not held hostage by facilities, fiber rights of way, and things that give carriers problems and add months or years to build-outs," he says. "We don’t have to play by the same rules, which is a unique angle for us."

It's an angle the company is leveraging to lease space to the carriers. Giftakis says HetNets looks like a tower company and controls all the real estate assets Towerstream has access to for small cell activity. If the operator doesn't want to give up control of the small-cell service offering, that's fine, he says. It can structure a deal with HetNets however it wants. (See Public Access Small Cells: Off to a Slow Start.)

All of HetNet's sites have high-capacity, point-to-point backhaul with 200 to 800 megs of backhaul as needed, Giftakis says. "You can use our access points and just use our backhaul, or just our mounting space, or our power, or not."

Giftakis notes that in his discussions with vendors and carriers, the type of small cell they want to deploy varies by month. "One month they want a God-like device with LTE and WiFi, then they start to realize the limitations," he says, adding that one device that does everything doesn't do anything well. His opinion is: More singlemode LTE small cells will start to come out, as well as those with 3G/4G card slots, rather than the oft-discussed multimode devices. (See AT&T Readies LTE-Only Small Cells, Eyes Multimode by 2015 and MWC 2014: Single-Mode 4G Small Cells Ahoy?)

So when that day comes, will HetNets Tower Corp. be a more appealing model to wireless operators looking to crack the public-access small-cell market? The challenges might be enough to convince the operators to give it a try, even if it means giving up some control -- or cash -- especially in major urban markets like NYC.

The HetNets subsidiary has fared well in its first year in business. Giftakis says it has already signed up as customers two "top-tier wireless carriers" and saw its revenues grow 21% to $0.7 million in the most recent fourth quarter, its first full quarter with a cable MSO paying rent to use its WiFi network. While the bulk of its business is with the cable companies, Towerstream says HetNets is also the answer to carrier small-cell deployments in the second half of the year.

"Backhaul, at the end of the day, has been a problem for carriers anyway," Giftakis says. "They spent a lot of money bringing fiber to towers, and there's only 'x' amount of towers. You can't afford to bring fiber to all those types of sites. When you start looking at these small-cell deployments, it gives us a leg up."

— Sarah Reedy, Senior Editor, Light Reading

chrisdress 4/3/2014 | 10:18:00 AM
Re: Towerstream Not sure.


A BIG Problem for small firms like Towerstream is that huge companies like telcos and cable providers want to do business with BIG companies, especially for any customer facing applications.  They do this because they believe that big companies will have the resources to support their needs.

This fact is death to the small companies who believe if they can land an elephant their success will be assured and as a result pump resources into supporting their sales efforts to the exclusion of chasing more profitable and higher % wins.

At this point I think Towerstream's best outcome is to be acquired by a larger firm so that they can be more attractive to these telcos/cable companies. 
Sarah Thomas 4/2/2014 | 2:32:03 PM
Re: Towerstream What company do you see as filling that partner role?
chrisdress 3/29/2014 | 1:34:30 PM
Re: Towerstream TWER has been a serial "disappointer".  Their CEO, Mr Thompson, has been promoting this concept with great fanfare for over 2 years and there is very little revenue to show for it; with the large investment, this has hurt the financials.

So far TWER has demonstarted that they have very little experience in understanding how these big companies make decisions and implement solutions.

TWER has been busy with the technology, which of course is critical, but these large elephants have a great ability to lead little companies like TWER around by the nose prior to doing it themselves in house.

I continue to stay in the name as I do think they have a good market position; however I think in order to maximize the return, the company needs a "strategic partner" with a track record in successfully dealing with the "big boys".

Best of luck to longs!

Sarah Thomas 3/23/2014 | 11:15:48 AM
Re: Towerstream That's true, Mark, and Towerstream wants to lease to as many operators as they can, so they will be on the same spots. But, that's inevitable anyway. ANywhere one operator improves, its competitors will want to as well.
MarkC73 3/22/2014 | 11:56:55 PM
Re: Towerstream I'm keeping an eye on this model, if a trust model can be worked out that the wireless carriers accept, it may also aid in the construction of the host carrier's wifi/wireless offering.  Not sure if that will be an aiding competition concern for the wireless folks since it's already competitive, I feel the main concerns will be enforceable SLAs, Security, and price.
Sarah Thomas 3/21/2014 | 8:20:02 AM
Re: Towerstream That could be one reason why it decided to spin out HetNets Towers as a subsidiary, to distance itself from the parent company. It has had this network and real estate for so long, so that's why it's training to repurpose it for WIFi and now small cells, to keep up with the changing industry dynamics.
DOShea 3/19/2014 | 9:58:43 PM
Towerstream This company has been around for a long time, and has had some interesting ideas over the year. But, they've had a tough time of it financially lately, and i have to think that will affect how ready (or not) carriers will be to work with them. If carriers are going to lease, they are going to need a high level of trust in whoever they're dealing with.
Mitch Wagner 3/19/2014 | 5:49:47 PM
Re: lease versus own Giving up control can be attractive if carriers get flexibility or cost savings in return. That's just basic business. 
Sarah Thomas 3/19/2014 | 3:45:48 PM
lease versus own It seems to me that leasing access like this will have to be at least part of operators' small cell mix. They can't do it all in all locations, and they will need the coverage help in dense urban areas like NYC where Towerstream is up and running. It may not be the most lucrative path, but it's the path of least resistance.
Sign In