& cplSiteName &

MOTO & NT: Again?

Phil Harvey
2/12/2008
50%
50%

1:00 AM -- After our story on Monday, an alert Light Reader reminded us that a joint venture between Motorola Inc. (NYSE: MOT) and Nortel Networks Ltd. has happened before -- and failed.

On Feb. 10, 1992, Motorola and Nortel announced a joint venture that would change the face of communications (by giving it a zit). Paul G. Stern, chairman and chief executive officer of Northern Telecom [now Nortel], said in a press release: "MOTOROLA-NORTEL Communications will bring together the leaders in the field, enabling it to provide customers throughout the Americas with world-class radio and switching equipment."

On the board of the new joint venture sat John Roth, one of the few people to accomplish that great Canadian-American dream of destroying a company and then getting paid for it.

The joint venture, as it was spun in 1992, was designed to capitalize on Motorola's cellular radio and Northern Telecom's digital switching technologies.

But the JV didn't last long. John Roth told the Financial Times in 1993: "We thought that (Motorola) would have a stronger radio portfolio than it turned out they actually had."

Another bone of contention, the press points out, was that Motorola loved CDMA and Nortel favored TDMA.

The JV soon failed and each company took its marbles and went home.

In Crain's Chicago Business, on August 23, 1993, the great Adam Lashinsky picked apart the failed bit: "One Motorola Nortel executive says the [joint venture's] personnel were like 'eunuchs' because they had no power to make independent decisions."

An executive quoted in the piece stated that "Every sales meeting had to have three parties to it, and every decision involved essentially a new layer."

Sounds like fun, no?

The context is much different now, but I wonder if some of the same problems might crop up. From our reader, who lived through the first JV:

Basically the problem was that every deal required sign-off from both sides. If Nortel got a "deal" it would be reject by Motorola because there was not enough Motorola equipment. Same held true of Motorola got a "deal". Neither side trusted the other to sell each others equipment.
Back then, just like now, both sides were getting their clocks cleaned by Ericsson AB (Nasdaq: ERIC) and DSC Communications (now Alcatel-Lucent (NYSE: ALU)).

So what do you think? Is history going to repeat itself?

— Phil Harvey, News Editor, Light Reading

(2)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
DCITDave
50%
50%
DCITDave,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 3:47:54 PM
re: MOTO & NT: Again?
i'm curious, since things are different this time around, what do you see as the main benefit for a MOT-NT jv?
cyberpunk
50%
50%
cyberpunk,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 3:47:15 PM
re: MOTO & NT: Again?
Nope, it will not. Primarily because both the
companies have in-built lethargic methodologies
built into their processes, and attitudes which
will cause this deal to fail. Nortel is known for
getting rid of people and technologies that it
has no patience for, and Motorola (since 2001)
has been doing the same. Not to mention the
incredible bureaucracy of layers that both Moto
and Nortel have, which will impede speedy and
efficient decision-making.
More Blogs from The Philter
Our series on the state of the SD-WAN market continues with a discussion on what's holding back some companies in the space and how standards and new technologies are advancing the cause of SD-WAN.
Jio's competitive market, fast growth and expanding customer base present some interesting machine learning and analytics challenges for Guavus, its newly announced analytics partner.
It's going to take some televisionary moves for pay-TV providers and big studio owners like AT&T to sort out what consumers want, how to package it and what to call it.
Machine learning is primed to help service providers run more efficient and effective networks, but first the good ideas have to make their way from the lab to the real world – and that's a big challenge, according to the University of Chicago's Nick Feamster.
Light Reading's editors discuss Dish Network, its pioneering past, a few hilarious missteps and why the company seems just as likely as anyone to be the next big player in 5G networks.
Featured Video
Upcoming Live Events
September 17-19, 2019, Dallas, Texas
October 1-2, 2019, New Orleans, Louisiana
October 10, 2019, New York, New York
October 22, 2019, Los Angeles, CA
November 5, 2019, London, England
November 7, 2019, London, UK
November 14, 2019, Maritim Hotel, Berlin
December 3-5, 2019, Vienna, Austria
December 3, 2019, New York, New York
March 16-18, 2020, Embassy Suites, Denver, Colorado
May 18-20, 2020, Irving Convention Center, Dallas, TX
All Upcoming Live Events