Nokia didn't hang around once it revealed early Tuesday that it was talking with Alcatel-Lucent about the creation of a mega-vendor: On Wednesday morning it unveiled the details of its €15.6 billion (US$16.6 billion) all-stock takeover bid for its Franco-American peer.
So what's going on? Light Reading has analyzed the ins and outs of this deal during the past two days -- here's a guide to what you need to know.
If the deal closes, the Finnish giant is going to swallow Alcatel-Lucent, proceed under the Nokia name only as from next year, and build a future based on scale, fixed/mobile integration, cloud/virtualization capabilities, IoT and 5G investments and a broad range of professional services targeted at communications service providers (CSPs).
There's a lot to consider, so when the two companies announced on Tuesday they were in talks, we looked at the history of the negotiations, how the companies stack up in terms of their financials and geographic spread and the main challenges they face in trying to pull together two large organizations.
There will be plenty more to come, especially as the integration plans emerge and the French government takes a close look at the plans. Watch out for more coverage.
Hope over experience Nice, pithy sum-up from The Economist: The Nokia-Alcatel merger represents the triumph of hope over experience. Talks about the long history of difficult telecom mergers, including both Nokia/Siemens and Alcatel/Lucent, then points out this one could work. The two companies together have scale to make them more competitive, but this merger is about product scope rather than scale. The two companies have complementary lines. "Alcatel-Lucent is strong in internet routers, for example, but its wireless business is small. Nokia's wireless-networks business, by contrast, is almost too dominant: it now accounts for 88% of revenues. ... " Also (not noted by The Economist), AlcaLu is strong in the emerging area of SDN, where Nokia is weak.
The French government "has given the deal a warm welcome," which is weird, says The Economist:
Still, it is strange that two weeks ago Emmanuel Macron, France's economy minister, intervened to prevent Orange, its biggest telecoms firm, from selling Dailymotion, a video-hosting site, to a Hong Kong buyer, prompting a rival offer from Vivendi, a French firm, instead. If Dailymotion is a strategic national asset it is hard to see why Alcatel, a stalwart of France's blue-chip CAC-40 index until its recent decline, is not.
I'm sure the number will hover around that for a given period, but after that "period" all bets are off.
ALso remember that ALu has already done some significant internal downsizing during "Shift", which means there's little need for additional cuts from the merger, unless there's significant overlap with another unit.
Truth is this is all hypothetical as we all have no clue :)
Re: Beware the tar pit I doubt that the national government would endorse a deal that would result in a diminished presence (and loss of jobs) in France. I think that would be the case even if Sarkozy and his crew were in charge. In general, agencies and regulators don't give absolute priority to what the involved businesses say they want. ALU has about 6,000 employees in France. I'm guessing that number won't change for a few years if this deal happens.
Re: Beware the tar pit @MendyK I'm sure there were some minor concessions to the fench, but the French weren't in a very good bargaining position this time compared to their last rounds, so I wouldn't bet that they had much say. Only time will tell.
Re: Beware the tar pit If it's true that the French government has already signed off on this deal (as has been reported), that's one big potential obstacle out of the way. It does make you wonder what kinds of concessions Nokia had to make to secure that support, given that France at least nominally will be losing a major name. If the concessions involved keeping Alcatel's operations in France relatively intact, that will more than likely diminish any potential cost savings.
Re: Beware the tar pit My main concern would be the French government meddling, although I'd hazard to guess that they've been consulted and are more realistic about ALu than the last time around.
Standard regulatory issues should be minimal as there's little overlap and they will merely be consolidating the 3 & 4 spots to create a better alternative vendor as well as a better competitor to Huawei.
Frankly I'm surprised Samsung hasn't put their hand in the mix here...
Beware the tar pit One of the biggest challenges here has little to do with how the two entities match up. It's how long the approval process is likely to take. Things are changing very quickly. A 12- to 24-month vetting process will put the new giant in a very deep hole.
Various reports suggest there has been a relaxation on the trade position being taken by the US authorities with regards to Huawei, but the situation for US vendors is no clearer.
The optical components specialist had its world turned upside down by the US ban on selling tech to Huawei. Can it regain its feet? Might it even get swallowed up in further components sector consolidation?
Colt, Filament, Mobileum and Synchronoss Technologies all submitted standout entries for most innovative blockchain for telecoms strategy in this year's Leading Lights contest.
The big noise in Barcelona was, of course, anything and everything to do with 5G, but in the background there were signs that some companies are embracing the potential of the public cloud as they determine their next-generation technology and services strategies.
To save this item to your list of favorite Light Reading content so you can find it later in your Profile page, click the "Save It" button next to the item.
If you found this interesting or useful, please use the links to the services below to share it with other readers. You will need a free account with each service to share an item via that service.
, Editor-in-Chief, Light Reading
(7) | 
Digg
Del.icio.us
Reddit
Tweet This