Featured Story
Vodafone and Three merger looks shaky after BT's latest attack
BT draws attention to the unworkability of behavioral remedies and says the only effective structural one is prohibition.
Public comments filed by Zhone urge the government to temper its use of foreign firms when doling out Recovery Act broadband funds
Expanding broadband services will help the U.S. with its economic recovery, but what if those services are delivered using telecom gear from -- gasp! -- the French or Chinese? How does that create jobs in the U.S.?
That's what some are asking the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) and the Rural Utilities Service (RUS) -- the agencies responsible for overseeing the more than $7 billion in loans and grants made available for telecom and broadband expansion projects as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. (See FCC Boots Up National Broadband Plan .)
Zhone Technologies Inc. (Nasdaq: ZHNE) is among the most vocal of the telecom gear companies urging the government to buy American with its Recovery Act funds and loans.
In a filing with the NTIA on April 2, Zhone CEO Mory Ejabat writes that Recovery Act "funding priority should be given to those proposals that show the highest expected American labor content in implementation — and that this metric should have at least equal if not higher weighting than metrics regarding expansion of broadband availability, increasing adoption, and increasing speed, in keeping with the priorities of the overall Act."
Several of Zhone's employees have followed their chief's lead and filed public comments asking the agencies in charge to consider enacting the "Buy American" provision.
"Stimulate America, not Asia!" pleaded the subject line of comments filed by Zhone employee Donna Scott.
"Since many manufacturers have off shored their manufacturing to Asia, failure to apply the Buy America provision could easily result in as much as $4 billion out of the total $7.2 billion in broadband stimulus funds going directly to sustain and create jobs in Asia," writes Charles Bauer, Zhone's director of operations, who failed to explain his figures.
Zhone sees itself as being positioned to create and sustain more American jobs if it is a supplier to carriers or municipalities using Recovery Act funds. The chart below, reproduced from Ejabat's letter, takes a whack at Zhone's competitors for having foreign headquarters and using offshore R&D and engineering facilities:
Table 1: Are They Located in the U.S.?
Vendors | Headquarters | Engineering | Manufacturing |
CommScope | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Corning | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Huber+Suhner | No | No | No |
Adtran | Yes | Yes | Partial |
Alcatel-Lucent | No | Minimal | No |
Calix | Yes | Partial | No |
Motorola | Yes | Partial | No |
Occam | Yes | Yes | No |
Tellabs | Yes | Yes | No |
Zhone | Yes | Yes | Yes |
ZyXEL | No | No | No |
The Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA) , which represents hundreds of manufacturers of communications equipment, disagrees with Zhone's assertion that the government should only source from American firms to boost its broadband penetration.
"In order to ensure that every possible technological solution be available to fulfill President Obama’s broadband goals, TIA urges the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), NTIA and RUS to implement the ARRA in a manner that will enable the widest possible access to available technologies, irrespective of their country of manufacture and the type of entity receiving BTOP [Broadband Technology Opportunities Program] or RUS funds," the pressure group writes in its public comment, filed on April 10.
Both Zhone and the TIA at times invoke section 1605 of the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act, which specifically states that the funds provided by the Act should be used for the "construction, alteration, maintenance, or repair of a public building or public work" only if all the "iron, steel, and manufactured goods used" were produced in the U.S. Many think other federal agencies will apply this language broadly to all aspects of the Recovery Act.
The NTIA itself couldn't be reached for comment for this story.
It's worth noting that the 1605 "Buy American" clause had some exceptions, including if the use of U.S. goods was found to be "inconsistent with the public interest," or if the use of U.S. goods caused the project's total cost to jump by "more than 25 percent."
The TIA asked federal agencies to apply the public interest waiver to the broadband procurement process, but failed to explain how buying solely from Zhone, CommScope Inc. , Corning Inc. (NYSE: GLW), or others, would harm the public interest. Steven Glapa, Zhone's VP of product management and marketing, drove that point home in his letter, dated April 14.
Glapa, noting that the TIA's board was made up of foreigners such as Ericsson AB (Nasdaq: ERIC), Nortel Networks Ltd. , and BlackBerry , writes that "the alignment of the TIA's interests with the interests of the United States and its taxpayers on this source-of-supply matter is certainly open to some question..."
Zhone, of course, doesn't limit its business to the U.S. The vendor gets more than half its revenues from carriers outside the U.S. and procures its components from "a variety of qualified suppliers in the U.S., Far East, Mexico, and other countries," according to its annual report.
— Phil Harvey, Editor-in-Chief, Light Reading
You May Also Like