x
Optical/IP

Cisco Pseudowires Verizon Business

In plunging into pseudowires with its "Private IP – Layer 2" service launched this week, Verizon Enterprise Solutions didn't offer much surprise in its choice of vendors.

Officials of the company formerly known as MCI say they're running pseudowires entirely on gear from Cisco Systems Inc. (Nasdaq: CSCO), the company that provided the carrier's IP setup. That could be a disappointment to fans of Hammerhead Systems Inc. , as reports in the spring said the startup had gotten its gear qualified at the carrier. (See Has Hammerhead Nailed Verizon?)

Hammerhead hasn't been shut out entirely, though. "We have definitely spoken to them in conjunction with their Ethernet capabilities and are aware of their Layer 2 capabilities, says Michael Marcellin, executive director of IP and Ethernet networking at Verizon Business.

Hammerhead officials wouldn't comment (and, to be fair, never confirmed they're working with Verizon Business). It's true that Hammerhead is planning to add support for virtual private LAN services (VPLS), VP of marketing Rob Keil says, so maybe the startup has a chance with Verizon Business on that front. Verizon Business says it plans to launch VPLS in the first quarter of 2007. (See AT&T, Verizon Expand on Ethernet.)

For Verizon Business, pseudowires present a Layer 2 complement to the private IP services already offered. While VPLS would target Ethernet customers, pseudowires let customers continue using ATM and Frame Relay services, while moving all that traffic onto the carrier's MPLS network, Marcellin says. (See Verizon Taps Layer 2.)

What's important is that pseudowires -- which Verizon Business is calling virtual private wire services -- and VPLS are both Layer 2 services, meaning they don't include IP routing. Some customers don't want to hand over their routing tables to a carrier. (See Pseudowires.)

Analyst David Hold of Current Analysis says Private IP – Layer 2 might have been rushed a bit, covering the gap when Verizon Business's VPLS service, originally slated for year's end, got delayed into 2007. "It's kind of like they wanted to get something out even though the pieces aren't all there," he says. "Customers running with a Frame Relay or ATM core are going to wait for all these pieces."

Among those are support for Ethernet and quality of service for ATM, both of which are coming, Marcellin says.

Verizon Business has been aggressive in moving customers to IP and MPLS, but it hasn't announced any plans to cap or close down its Frame Relay and ATM networks, because it doesn't want to upset certain longtime customers. "Government customers will typically sign five- to 10-year deals, and with budgets and maybe reluctance to move to new technologies, that vertical may be slower to move than others," Marcellin says.

Pseudowires have remained a hot enough topic to bring in more cash for some of the startups involved -- Hammerhead raised $30 million early this year, and Mangrove Systems Inc. picked up $13 million this summer. (See Hammerhead Raises $30M and Mangrove Secures New Funding.)

Other pseudowire competitors include Axerra Networks Inc. , Corrigent Systems Inc. , Overture Networks Inc. , RAD Data Communications Ltd. , and Telco Systems (BATM) .

Some of the interest comes not from services like Verizon Business's, but from the prospect of using pseudowires in wireless backhaul networks. (See Wireless May Boost Pseudowire.)

— Craig Matsumoto, Senior Editor, Light Reading

Pete Baldwin 12/5/2012 | 3:35:20 AM
re: Cisco Pseudowires Verizon Business Forgot to mention Tellabs -- the old Vivace box -- in all of this.

Come to think of it, wouldn't that have been a good candidate for this job too? What happened to them here?
crazyoptics 12/5/2012 | 3:35:18 AM
re: Cisco Pseudowires Verizon Business Craig,
I am very disappointed with this article. And more importantly, if you do not know the answer to your question, you probably should not have written the article.

1) You only told one piece of the story about pseudowires and only where Cisco is involved
2) You mentioned nothing about how the ATM/FR traffic enters the pseudowire cloud. Whose equipment and which network?
3) You mentioned nothing about where Tellabs is and where Hammerhead will be involved. Huge upside here.

Tellabs and Hammerhead are just entering the pseudowire/VPLS saga where there will be huge opportunity for both companies to interoperate, battle out for more markets and the ultimately define who has the better box. You wrote this article like the pseudowires were done only on Cisco-end of story. You have only defined the very tip of the iceberg my friend.

Please tell the whole story next time and don't slam vendors in areas where you have no knowledgeGǪGǪGǪGǪand get Cisco out of your pocket!


CRZY
HOME
Sign In
SEARCH
CLOSE
MORE
CLOSE