Huawei, ZTE Face US Federal Ban

In a sign of growing hostility towards Huawei and ZTE from some quarters of the US establishment, Texas Congressman Mike Conaway has proposed new legislation that would prohibit US authorities from buying any product or service from the Chinese companies.

The legislation could prevent Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. and ZTE Corp. (Shenzhen: 000063; Hong Kong: 0763) from selling gear, including networks and consumer devices, to operators that fulfill US government contracts, which effectively means any of the major national players.

In a statement about the bill, entitled "The Defending U.S. Government Communications Act," Conaway notes that the bill "prohibits the U.S. government from purchasing or leasing telecommunications equipment and/or services from Huawei, ZTE, or any subsidiaries/affiliates thereof."

Operators including AT&T Inc. (NYSE: T), Verizon Communications Inc. (NYSE: VZ), T-Mobile US Inc. and Sprint Corp. (NYSE: S) have been warned off from using Huawei and ZTE network equipment since 2012, when a US government report described the Chinese vendors as a potential security threat because of their perceived links with the Chinese state. (See US vs Huawei/ZTE: The Verdict and China Lashes Out at 'Cold War Mentality'.)

That report, and the recommendation that network operators should not deploy Chinese technology, was enough to shut Huawei and ZTE out of the running for network systems deals with the major operators, but there was no bill and no legislation.

Since then, there have been hopes in China that US policymakers might eventually soften their position and allow Huawei and ZTE to compete for business against Western equipment makers including Ericsson AB (Nasdaq: ERIC) and Nokia.

Those hopes appeared to recede with the election to the US presidency of Donald Trump, whose protectionist rhetoric seems at odds with any effort to open the door for the Chinese companies.

An admirer of Trump's hardline stance, Texan representative Mike Conaway is now attempting to slam it firmly shut, locking the Chinese out for good with legislation (rather than just recommendations) that covers network technology and end user devices.

In a statement published on his website late Friday, Conaway delivered a blunt assessment of the "threat" posed by Huawei and ZTE.

"Chinese commercial technology is a vehicle for the Chinese government to spy on United States federal agencies, posing a severe national security threat," he said.

"Allowing Huawei, ZTE and other related entities access to US government communications would be inviting Chinese surveillance into all aspects of our lives," Conaway added. "This legislation falls directly in line with President Trump's policy of putting American national security interests first, a policy I'm proud to support."

The threat from Huawei and ZTE is on the rise, Conaway argued, amid signs of spying and surveillance activities by the Chinese government.

"This is an issue we've followed for years at the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI)," he said. "The threat receded after the release of an incriminating HPSCI report, but is now re-emerging as the Chinese government is re-attempting to embed themselves into US technology."

"This is extremely dangerous because the Chinese government is trying to compromise the integrity of US businesses and spy on our closely held national security secrets," Conaway concluded.

For all the latest news from the wireless networking and services sector, check out our dedicated mobile content channel here on Light Reading.

The legislative move came after a week of negative publicity for Huawei, which failed to secure a major smartphone distribution deal with US telecom giant AT&T. (See Huawei Still Knocking on US Door – but AT&T Deal Thwarted.)

"The US market presents unique challenges for Huawei, and while the Huawei Mate 10 Pro will not be sold by US carriers, we remain committed to this market now and in the future," Huawei said in a statement last week.

According to a report from Reuters, security concerns were raised during the negotiations between AT&T and Huawei.

Conaway's legislation, if passed, could permanently end discussions between major US operators and Chinese manufacturers about such distribution deals.

While Huawei and ZTE are locked out of opportunities to serve and work through the likes of AT&T and Verizon, they have catered to a number of regional and local operators.

Huawei already sells its smartphones to US consumers, but not through the mobile service provider channels that account for the lion's share of smartphone sales.

— Iain Morris, News Editor, Light Reading

kq4ym 1/30/2018 | 9:03:09 AM
Re: Huawei should be permanently banned from any US sales The ups and downs of protectionism will continue as they have for centuries as nations develop competitie advantages and others try to cut them out of the market, and as fears of the other "tribe" grow stronger and regulations attempt to keep them at bay.
amsa44 1/16/2018 | 10:18:42 PM
Huawei-US I think this is not the right way to go. Huawei becomes larger and a powerfull company because of hard work! The US can keep doing the same like let Huawei build the core network and use US company device like CISCO to protect the edges of the Network. 

This is competition US be fair!

lightreceding 1/16/2018 | 4:09:27 PM
Huawei and Cisco Huawei was found to be in possession of Cisco source code in a lawsuit from 2004. They were also rumored to have backdoors that the Chinese government could access. I heard that Cisco was behind the ban on Huawei in 2012 and that Chambers lobbied congress to get it. Cisco is probably pushing to get Huawei permanently banned from the US.
mendyk 1/16/2018 | 9:40:23 AM
Re: Huawei should be permanently banned from any US sales I guess resurrecting a form of the Chinese Exclusion Act (enacted in 1882) could be seen by some as part of a grand plan to Make America Great Again. As for relying on only home-grown telecom products, let's try it. What could go wrong, for instance?
brooks7 1/15/2018 | 1:39:44 PM
Re: Huawei should be permanently banned from any US sales  

I have always thought that we needed to have an open dialogue about telecom as a strategic technology and our ability to supply ourselves with equipment.

Permanent Ban?  Not so sure on that one.  Should we stop the US from using Exxon, Chevron, Texaco, Marathon, and BP because they were all formerly part of or have substantial roots in Standard Oil?  We might not want to do business with one or more of those firms for other reasons, but it seems to me that what John D. Rockefeller didshould not have any consequence on our views today.



Sign In