Light Reading

Net Neutrality Fight Not Over

Carol Wilson
1/14/2014
50%
50%

The federal appeals court ruling today that struck down the FCC's Net Neutrality rules is the latest chapter in a long saga, and it leaves the next move uncertain as new FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler and crew decide whether to file an appeal.

What's interesting about the ruling is that it actually upheld the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) 's right to impose such rules. The court effectively said the agency can regulate the Internet, but it said the rules as they currently exist in the FCC's Open Internet Order couldn't be applied to broadband Internet service providers. The FCC had already indicated that these companies are not common carriers and thus not subject to regulation. (See Bye Bye Net Neutrality?)

That sets up the possibility of the FCC reclassifying the broadband ISPs as common carriers -- a process that would be lengthy and hard-fought on all sides -- or appealing the ruling and arguing that Net Neutrality regulations aren't common carrier rules.

The Washington Post reported that Judge David Tatel of the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, who wrote the opinion, noted that the Communications Act prohibits the FCC from regulating companies that it says are not common carriers.

Wheeler responded to the ruling almost immediately by saying the FCC is keeping its options open and could appeal. "I am committed to maintaining our networks as engines for economic growth, test beds for innovative services and products, and channels for all forms of speech protected by the First Amendment." (See Wheeler Walks Line on Net Neutrality.)

The reactions of the two Republican commissioners seemed to indicate little interest in more court action. Commissioner Ajit Pai said the latest ruling was a sign that the agency should "take no for an answer." Commissioner Mike O'Reilly said the FCC should stop looking to impose "prophylactic regulations" and focus on removing obstacles to broadband investment and innovation.

Other reactions went along the expected lines. Verizon Communications Inc. (NYSE: VZ), which brought the court challenge, applauded the decision but said it will not impact consumers' ability to access content via the Internet. In its reaction, the National Cable & Telecommunications Association (NCTA) also pledged its commitment to an open Internet.

Consumer groups such as Public Knowledge expressed alarm at the ruling and its potential for allowing large ISPs to control access to the Internet and harm innovation. Harold Feld, senior vice president for Public Knowledge, said in a press release that the ruling could impair the FCC's ability to manage regulations in the transition to an all-IP network. However, he also said the court left the door open for the FCC to "craft open Internet protection [regulations] that are not full fledged common carrier rules. Alternatively, if the FCC needs broader authority it can classify broadband as a title 2 common carrier service."

— Carol Wilson, Editor-at-Large, Light Reading

(23)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Page 1 / 3   >   >>
geekhole
50%
50%
geekhole,
User Rank: Light Beer
1/15/2014 | 1:52:32 PM
Best Effort vs. Differentiated Services...
To build wider highways where all drivers share the same experience or to add toll roads next to the highways for the tractor trailers who don't want to wait in traffic, that is the question. 
brookseven
50%
50%
brookseven,
User Rank: Light Sabre
1/15/2014 | 10:54:47 AM
Re: Might be Over
Carol,

I am a dreamer....don't harsh my buzz! :)

seven

PS - I have lobbied and testified at the FCC so I know better.
Carol Wilson
50%
50%
Carol Wilson,
User Rank: Blogger
1/15/2014 | 10:53:36 AM
Re: Might be Over
Very well said, Seven. 

I agree with what you are saying about structural separation - and the Pronto reference made me nostalgic. 

But can you see today's FCC creating this regime, because I can't. The lobbying power of the big carriers is too strong and they would never let this happen. 
brookseven
50%
50%
brookseven,
User Rank: Light Sabre
1/15/2014 | 10:50:36 AM
Re: Might be Over
Carol,

Yes, I believe SS is impossible.  That is why I advocate for making Broadband Access a Universal Service.  I would not change the rules around IP transit but make sure that people understood that if things get unfair I am going common carrier on them.

So once I got folks Universal Broadband Service,  I would do it with escalating minimum data rate capability.  Essentially I would force people to deploy fiber.

It is one reason I think language is important.  ISP service is NOT Access Service.  Even today you can get (for regular DSL) UNE-L.  I would make the ongoing waiver of UNE-L supported by this Universal Service investment.

The one thing that I would go for if I was the FCC is that the Access Network is a MOST a Layer 2 network.  The reason for this is that you could then do Pronto style unbundling to replace UNE-L as we get there.

So, what do I get as carrier?  You get to own your pipe...you get to deliver service.  If you invest in your network, you will get more business.  I think this notion that OTT players are taking money out of the carrier hands is a nice lobbying position.  So let's go back to static web pages and email.  People drop the size of their BB Access pipes and the carriers/MSOs lose a huge chunk of revenue.  Essentially, all the Access Providers should bend at the knee of Netflix and Youtube and thank them for all the revenue they bring.

seven

 
KBode
50%
50%
KBode,
User Rank: Light Sabre
1/15/2014 | 10:16:22 AM
Re: Might be Over
Yes, I think the discussion has gotten so incredibly convoluted over the last few years that perhaps what is needed most is a pure example of just what happens if these rules don't exist or there's no regulators with the authority to police anti-competitive behavior against content and services.

Though I worry that you could elininate ALL regulators and regulations from the market, see prices skyrocket 300%, see non-ISP services blocked and hindered, and you'd still see rhetoric claiming that we were living in a telecom Utopia from many corners.
Carol Wilson
50%
50%
Carol Wilson,
User Rank: Blogger
1/15/2014 | 10:13:20 AM
Re: Might be Over
Two responses:

Seven, structural separation has been the most intruiguing option for some time now. Real implementations have been rare and not successful and I doubt it will ever happen on a large scale, as do you, I suspect. 

KBode, it will be interesting to see how long the companies who battled NN for so long can go without confirming the worst fears of those who sought NN. I share your honest curiousity for how this plays out. 
KBode
50%
50%
KBode,
User Rank: Light Sabre
1/15/2014 | 10:02:18 AM
Might be Over
Lost is the fact that these rules never really did all that much to begin with. They were based largely on proposed rules created by Verizon and Google, didn't really cover the anti-competitive implementation of usage caps, and certainly didn't protect consumers from abuses on wireless networks.

As I see it Wheeler can either buck his lobbyist history and reclassify carriers under Title II, or we can look forward to seeing ISPs unleash their version of "innovation" on the market under layers of new concepts solely focused on jacking up quarterly revenues with new and expensive pricing layers.

Neutrality opponents have long argued nothing would go wrong with no rules or a strong regulatory presence in place, and I'm honestly now quite curious to see them get to test their theory.
spc_isdnip
50%
50%
spc_isdnip,
User Rank: Lightning
1/15/2014 | 7:32:01 AM
Re: Impact on IP network rules and regs
Well, Seven, I certainly think structural separation would be a good idea, and have advocated for it consistently.  But I do think that ISPs generally still ban spamming, even if it technically complies.  Remember Spamford Wallace?  He never got to set up his spam-friendly ISP because it would have been denied transit.  There are acceptable bulk emails, the type sent to existin cusotmer relationships by companies like Constant Contact.  But then there is pure spam, which is legal if it has a PO Box footer which techically removes the recipient from *that* specific mailing six weeks after the fact (making it useless) if the recipient sends postal mail to that box.  Its a joke.

But more importantly, bulk video uploading can cause real harm too, since there is highly constrained upsteram capacity on cable networks, and that's what Comcast was trying to solve in 2005 (a bit ham-handedly, perhaps) when Vuze, a pR0n distributor building a rogue CDN out of its clients running on home PCs, got Kevin Martin on their side to attack Comcast and start the NN fight at the FCC.
brookseven
50%
50%
brookseven,
User Rank: Light Sabre
1/15/2014 | 12:04:41 AM
Re: Impact on IP network rules and regs
I ran the Message Security (read Spam Filtering) service for Edgewave.  We had about 200 Internet Service Providers as customers.  So, I think you are all using words so loosely we are bound to argue.

If you are on an running Gmail over an Sonic.net service you actually have 3 service providers:

1 - AT&T (via UNE-L) is you local access line owner

2 - Sonic is both your Broadband Access Provider (or Access Service Provider) as well as your Internet Service Provider.

3 - Google is your Mail Service Provider.

In this case, Google will do Spam filtering via its former Postini Mail filter.  By the way, they do inbound mail filtering only and do NOT filter outbound mail.  Neither Sonic in either of its roles nor AT&T is doing any filtering.

On top of that, we are always talking past each other about the word SPAM.  I do not know of any ISPs that block the transmission of CAN-SPAM compliant emails that do not have any malicious components.  I will add that we allowed users (if the ISP wanted to allow them to do this) to block what we classified as "BULK" emails. We did block emails that had malicious components within them either by putting them in the Spam Folder or by actually blocking them

Let me also say that Outbound Filtering is not the norm for SPAM filters.  Only some filters actually work on the Outbound Stream.  ISPs do need to monitor their reputation and deploy Outbound filters (and Edgewave had them).

I agree with some few exceptions that pure blacklisting is a poor way to block SPAM and will become OBE with IPv6.

To recap - Mail Service Providers (MSP) provide Spam Filtering.  It is essentially a feature that is expected by users.  Some MSPs allow end users to configure their Spam Filtering actions based on mail classification.  The Internet Part of this does no filtering.  

I also think this language confusion exists in the lower conversation about network investment.  Nobody cares about ISP investment.  Everybody cares about ASP investment.  Maybe we should talk about structural separation again.

seven

 
spc_isdnip
50%
50%
spc_isdnip,
User Rank: Lightning
1/14/2014 | 10:24:10 PM
Re: Impact on IP network rules and regs
I'm talking about blacklisting and "mutually assured destrution", not mail-conntet filtering, which should generally be an end user task.  An ISP will block another one that permits spam or sells "pink contracts" to spammers, and an ISP will block an ISP who provides transit to such an ISP.  They don't just block the spam but the whole ISP, which is why spammers rely on pwned machines and don't just put servers in carrier hotels.  Since this policy has been around for a long time, people don't even know it exists, since no ISP wants the equivalent of capital punishment for permiting spam.  But strict neutrality rules would overturn that, since the yes-you-CAN SPAM act makes spam legal.
Page 1 / 3   >   >>
Flash Poll
From The Founder
The New IP is actually bigger even than business. Like another hugely important tech that Light Reading is digging into right now, the New IP has the potential to change the world by fundamentally advancing what it is possible for people to achieve with communications.
Que Sera Sarah
Growth of the 5G Ecosystem

3|6|15   |   1:15   |   (1) comment


Use cases and industry collaborations dominated 5G discussions during Mobile World Congress 2015. For what the road to 5G means for operators and their partners, head to the Building America's 5G Ecosystem event in New York on April 14.
LRTV Custom TV
Sonus NaaS IQ Real-Time Demo

3|6|15   |   4:03   |   (0) comments


Compass Networks Chairman and CEO Matt Bross and Ray Dolin, CEO of Sonus Networks, demonstrate their Sonus IQ SDN solution using a live video conference connection.
LRTV Custom TV
LRTV Talks Carrier WiFi & WiFi Calling With Aptilo Networks

3|6|15   |   4:53   |   (0) comments


We stopped by Aptilo Networks, a market leader in WiFi service management and offloading, to discuss the new possibilities with next-generation WiFi calling and why WiFi should be a natural part of any operator strategy.
LRTV Interviews
NGMN Chairman Outlines His 5G Vision

3|6|15   |   5:10   |   (1) comment


Bruno Jacobfeuerborn, chairman of the NGMN Alliance and Deutsche Telekom CTO, shares his thoughts on the challenges, opportunities and costs of 5G.
LRTV Interviews
In the Cloud With Telecom Italia

3|5|15   |   7:10   |   (0) comments


Light Reading CEO Steve Saunders sits down with Telecom Italia's Simone Battiferri at Mobile World Congress to discuss virtualization, agility and the economic advantages of the cloud.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
New Ways of Working

3|5|15   |   4:24   |   (0) comments


At the ICT Leaders Roundtable, hosted jointly by Light Reading and Huawei at the Hotel Renaissance in Barcelona just prior to Mobile World Congress, Hong Kong Telecom's Michael Yue explains how the transformation in its business has changed its customer relationships.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Bridging the Digital Gap

3|5|15   |   4:03   |   (0) comments


At the ICT Leaders Roundtable, hosted jointly by Light Reading and Huawei at the Hotel Renaissance in Barcelona just prior to Mobile World Congress, Boingo's Dr. Derek Peterson explains how ICT can help telcos bring the physical and virtual worlds closer together.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Making the Internet of Things Affordable

3|5|15   |   2:42   |   (0) comments


At the ICT Leaders Roundtable, hosted jointly by Light Reading and Huawei at the Hotel Renaissance in Barcelona just prior to Mobile World Congress, Telefonica's Dr. Mike Short explains how the Internet of Things demands a new low-cost approach to connectivity from telcos.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Evolution, Not Revolution

3|5|15   |   2:00   |   (0) comments


At the ICT Leaders Roundtable, hosted jointly by Light Reading and Huawei at the Hotel Renaissance in Barcelona just prior to Mobile World Congress, Heavy Reading's Patrick Donegan explains why telcos can't be too hasty in their efforts to transform themselves.
LRTV Custom TV
Management & Orchestration Enablement Strategies Required for NFV Commercial Success

3|5|15   |   6:22   |   (0) comments


NFV commercial success rests on successful service orchestration strategies which can span heterogeneous physical, virtual, legacy and next-gen networks. Network data and security integrity are additional key aspects. Nakina provides a suite of orchestratable network integrity applications built on an open, scalable MANO enablement platform.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
The Power of Five Convergences in OceanStor OS

3|4|15   |   6:24   |   (0) comments


OceanStor OS is Huawei's brand-new storage operating system. While inheriting the consistent high stability, reliability and performance from the company's previous storage products, OceanStor OS abounds in new converged storage features. Specifically, the new storage operating system achieves "five convergences" to lift storage convergence to a higher level.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
4K Brings Extreme Video Experience

3|4|15   |   8:10   |   (0) comments


4K video is a hot topic in the video industry. It will certainly bring an extreme video experience to end users. At the same time, however, it will also pose a big challenge to operators. Check out this Huawei 4K experts' discussion about how operators can achieve success in 4K video service.
Upcoming Live Events
March 17, 2015, The Cable Center, Denver, CO
April 14, 2015, The Westin Times Square, New York City, NY
May 12, 2015, Grand Hyatt, Denver, CO
May 13-14, 2015, The Westin Peachtree, Atlanta, GA
June 8, 2015, Chicago, IL
June 9-10, 2015, Chicago, IL
June 9, 2015, Chicago, IL
June 10, 2015, Chicago, IL
All Upcoming Live Events
Infographics
Net neutrality, broadband services and the current outlook on data consumption, as presented by the New Jersey Institute of Technology.
Hot Topics
Internet Pioneers Decry Title II Rules
Carol Wilson, Editor-at-large, 3/2/2015
Wheeler: We'll Enforce Title II 'Case-By-Case'
Sarah Thomas, Editorial Operations Director, 3/3/2015
New CenturyLink CTO in Major Overhaul
Carol Wilson, Editor-at-large, 3/4/2015
Alibaba 'Planting a Flag' in US Cloud Market
Mitch Wagner, West Coast Bureau Chief, Light Reading, 3/4/2015
Like Us on Facebook
Twitter Feed
Webinar Archive
BETWEEN THE CEOs - Executive Interviews
Chattanooga’s EPB publicly owned utility comms company has become a poster child for how to enable a local economy using next-gen networking technology. Steve Saunders, Founder of Light Reading, sits down with Harold DePriest, president and CEO of EPB, to learn how EPB is bringing big time tech to small town America.
Light Reading CEO Steve Saunders talks transformation and virtualization – including Light Reading's independent testing of the vendor's virtualization solutions – with Cisco CEO John Chambers at Mobile World Congress in Barcelona.
Check out Light Reading's interview with Jay Samit, the newly appointed CEO of publicly traded SeaChange International Inc. With a resume that includes Sony, EMI, and Universal, Samit brings a reputation as an entrepreneur and a disruptor to his new role at the video solutions company. Hear what he had to say about the opportunities in video, as well as the outlook for cable, telco, OTT and mobile service providers.
G'day! And welcome to an entirely new feature on Light Reading -- our weekly "CEO-to-CEO" interview.