Light Reading

Net Neutrality Fight Not Over

Carol Wilson
1/14/2014
50%
50%

The federal appeals court ruling today that struck down the FCC's Net Neutrality rules is the latest chapter in a long saga, and it leaves the next move uncertain as new FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler and crew decide whether to file an appeal.

What's interesting about the ruling is that it actually upheld the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) 's right to impose such rules. The court effectively said the agency can regulate the Internet, but it said the rules as they currently exist in the FCC's Open Internet Order couldn't be applied to broadband Internet service providers. The FCC had already indicated that these companies are not common carriers and thus not subject to regulation. (See Bye Bye Net Neutrality?)

That sets up the possibility of the FCC reclassifying the broadband ISPs as common carriers -- a process that would be lengthy and hard-fought on all sides -- or appealing the ruling and arguing that Net Neutrality regulations aren't common carrier rules.

The Washington Post reported that Judge David Tatel of the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, who wrote the opinion, noted that the Communications Act prohibits the FCC from regulating companies that it says are not common carriers.

Wheeler responded to the ruling almost immediately by saying the FCC is keeping its options open and could appeal. "I am committed to maintaining our networks as engines for economic growth, test beds for innovative services and products, and channels for all forms of speech protected by the First Amendment." (See Wheeler Walks Line on Net Neutrality.)

The reactions of the two Republican commissioners seemed to indicate little interest in more court action. Commissioner Ajit Pai said the latest ruling was a sign that the agency should "take no for an answer." Commissioner Mike O'Reilly said the FCC should stop looking to impose "prophylactic regulations" and focus on removing obstacles to broadband investment and innovation.

Other reactions went along the expected lines. Verizon Communications Inc. (NYSE: VZ), which brought the court challenge, applauded the decision but said it will not impact consumers' ability to access content via the Internet. In its reaction, the National Cable & Telecommunications Association (NCTA) also pledged its commitment to an open Internet.

Consumer groups such as Public Knowledge expressed alarm at the ruling and its potential for allowing large ISPs to control access to the Internet and harm innovation. Harold Feld, senior vice president for Public Knowledge, said in a press release that the ruling could impair the FCC's ability to manage regulations in the transition to an all-IP network. However, he also said the court left the door open for the FCC to "craft open Internet protection [regulations] that are not full fledged common carrier rules. Alternatively, if the FCC needs broader authority it can classify broadband as a title 2 common carrier service."

— Carol Wilson, Editor-at-Large, Light Reading

(23)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Page 1 / 3   >   >>
geekhole
50%
50%
geekhole,
User Rank: Light Beer
1/15/2014 | 1:52:32 PM
Best Effort vs. Differentiated Services...
To build wider highways where all drivers share the same experience or to add toll roads next to the highways for the tractor trailers who don't want to wait in traffic, that is the question. 
brookseven
50%
50%
brookseven,
User Rank: Light Sabre
1/15/2014 | 10:54:47 AM
Re: Might be Over
Carol,

I am a dreamer....don't harsh my buzz! :)

seven

PS - I have lobbied and testified at the FCC so I know better.
Carol Wilson
50%
50%
Carol Wilson,
User Rank: Blogger
1/15/2014 | 10:53:36 AM
Re: Might be Over
Very well said, Seven. 

I agree with what you are saying about structural separation - and the Pronto reference made me nostalgic. 

But can you see today's FCC creating this regime, because I can't. The lobbying power of the big carriers is too strong and they would never let this happen. 
brookseven
50%
50%
brookseven,
User Rank: Light Sabre
1/15/2014 | 10:50:36 AM
Re: Might be Over
Carol,

Yes, I believe SS is impossible.  That is why I advocate for making Broadband Access a Universal Service.  I would not change the rules around IP transit but make sure that people understood that if things get unfair I am going common carrier on them.

So once I got folks Universal Broadband Service,  I would do it with escalating minimum data rate capability.  Essentially I would force people to deploy fiber.

It is one reason I think language is important.  ISP service is NOT Access Service.  Even today you can get (for regular DSL) UNE-L.  I would make the ongoing waiver of UNE-L supported by this Universal Service investment.

The one thing that I would go for if I was the FCC is that the Access Network is a MOST a Layer 2 network.  The reason for this is that you could then do Pronto style unbundling to replace UNE-L as we get there.

So, what do I get as carrier?  You get to own your pipe...you get to deliver service.  If you invest in your network, you will get more business.  I think this notion that OTT players are taking money out of the carrier hands is a nice lobbying position.  So let's go back to static web pages and email.  People drop the size of their BB Access pipes and the carriers/MSOs lose a huge chunk of revenue.  Essentially, all the Access Providers should bend at the knee of Netflix and Youtube and thank them for all the revenue they bring.

seven

 
KBode
50%
50%
KBode,
User Rank: Light Sabre
1/15/2014 | 10:16:22 AM
Re: Might be Over
Yes, I think the discussion has gotten so incredibly convoluted over the last few years that perhaps what is needed most is a pure example of just what happens if these rules don't exist or there's no regulators with the authority to police anti-competitive behavior against content and services.

Though I worry that you could elininate ALL regulators and regulations from the market, see prices skyrocket 300%, see non-ISP services blocked and hindered, and you'd still see rhetoric claiming that we were living in a telecom Utopia from many corners.
Carol Wilson
50%
50%
Carol Wilson,
User Rank: Blogger
1/15/2014 | 10:13:20 AM
Re: Might be Over
Two responses:

Seven, structural separation has been the most intruiguing option for some time now. Real implementations have been rare and not successful and I doubt it will ever happen on a large scale, as do you, I suspect. 

KBode, it will be interesting to see how long the companies who battled NN for so long can go without confirming the worst fears of those who sought NN. I share your honest curiousity for how this plays out. 
KBode
50%
50%
KBode,
User Rank: Light Sabre
1/15/2014 | 10:02:18 AM
Might be Over
Lost is the fact that these rules never really did all that much to begin with. They were based largely on proposed rules created by Verizon and Google, didn't really cover the anti-competitive implementation of usage caps, and certainly didn't protect consumers from abuses on wireless networks.

As I see it Wheeler can either buck his lobbyist history and reclassify carriers under Title II, or we can look forward to seeing ISPs unleash their version of "innovation" on the market under layers of new concepts solely focused on jacking up quarterly revenues with new and expensive pricing layers.

Neutrality opponents have long argued nothing would go wrong with no rules or a strong regulatory presence in place, and I'm honestly now quite curious to see them get to test their theory.
spc_isdnip
50%
50%
spc_isdnip,
User Rank: Lightning
1/15/2014 | 7:32:01 AM
Re: Impact on IP network rules and regs
Well, Seven, I certainly think structural separation would be a good idea, and have advocated for it consistently.  But I do think that ISPs generally still ban spamming, even if it technically complies.  Remember Spamford Wallace?  He never got to set up his spam-friendly ISP because it would have been denied transit.  There are acceptable bulk emails, the type sent to existin cusotmer relationships by companies like Constant Contact.  But then there is pure spam, which is legal if it has a PO Box footer which techically removes the recipient from *that* specific mailing six weeks after the fact (making it useless) if the recipient sends postal mail to that box.  Its a joke.

But more importantly, bulk video uploading can cause real harm too, since there is highly constrained upsteram capacity on cable networks, and that's what Comcast was trying to solve in 2005 (a bit ham-handedly, perhaps) when Vuze, a pR0n distributor building a rogue CDN out of its clients running on home PCs, got Kevin Martin on their side to attack Comcast and start the NN fight at the FCC.
brookseven
50%
50%
brookseven,
User Rank: Light Sabre
1/15/2014 | 12:04:41 AM
Re: Impact on IP network rules and regs
I ran the Message Security (read Spam Filtering) service for Edgewave.  We had about 200 Internet Service Providers as customers.  So, I think you are all using words so loosely we are bound to argue.

If you are on an running Gmail over an Sonic.net service you actually have 3 service providers:

1 - AT&T (via UNE-L) is you local access line owner

2 - Sonic is both your Broadband Access Provider (or Access Service Provider) as well as your Internet Service Provider.

3 - Google is your Mail Service Provider.

In this case, Google will do Spam filtering via its former Postini Mail filter.  By the way, they do inbound mail filtering only and do NOT filter outbound mail.  Neither Sonic in either of its roles nor AT&T is doing any filtering.

On top of that, we are always talking past each other about the word SPAM.  I do not know of any ISPs that block the transmission of CAN-SPAM compliant emails that do not have any malicious components.  I will add that we allowed users (if the ISP wanted to allow them to do this) to block what we classified as "BULK" emails. We did block emails that had malicious components within them either by putting them in the Spam Folder or by actually blocking them

Let me also say that Outbound Filtering is not the norm for SPAM filters.  Only some filters actually work on the Outbound Stream.  ISPs do need to monitor their reputation and deploy Outbound filters (and Edgewave had them).

I agree with some few exceptions that pure blacklisting is a poor way to block SPAM and will become OBE with IPv6.

To recap - Mail Service Providers (MSP) provide Spam Filtering.  It is essentially a feature that is expected by users.  Some MSPs allow end users to configure their Spam Filtering actions based on mail classification.  The Internet Part of this does no filtering.  

I also think this language confusion exists in the lower conversation about network investment.  Nobody cares about ISP investment.  Everybody cares about ASP investment.  Maybe we should talk about structural separation again.

seven

 
spc_isdnip
50%
50%
spc_isdnip,
User Rank: Lightning
1/14/2014 | 10:24:10 PM
Re: Impact on IP network rules and regs
I'm talking about blacklisting and "mutually assured destrution", not mail-conntet filtering, which should generally be an end user task.  An ISP will block another one that permits spam or sells "pink contracts" to spammers, and an ISP will block an ISP who provides transit to such an ISP.  They don't just block the spam but the whole ISP, which is why spammers rely on pwned machines and don't just put servers in carrier hotels.  Since this policy has been around for a long time, people don't even know it exists, since no ISP wants the equivalent of capital punishment for permiting spam.  But strict neutrality rules would overturn that, since the yes-you-CAN SPAM act makes spam legal.
Page 1 / 3   >   >>
Flash Poll
From The Founder
Networks of the future will rely on "white box" switches and servers rather than proprietary hardware and that's going to alter the shape of the communications industry. Who says so? John Chambers.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Huawei Intros Smart Device for eLTE

3|30|15   |   05:25   |   (0) comments


Huawei has developed a secure, location-aware multimedia smartphone for its eLTE trunked radio solution, says Huawei's Norman Frisch.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Win Video, Win All

3|30|15   |   06:44   |   (0) comments


Video is going to be the next main source of revenue for operators. Operators have big opportunities and advantages to monetize video services. Globally, Huawei has helped more than 70 operators achieve over 30 million video subscribers. Watch this video for more.
LRTV Custom TV
The Benefits of HyperScale Clouds for NFV

3|27|15   |   01:50   |   (0) comments


Hyperscale cloud has been developed by the Internet giants to support the creation and delivery of software-based services at blistering speeds, and at the lowest possible cost. The original ETSI NFV vision was to adopt hyperscale cloud architecture and practices. This vision has become somewhat obscured along the way, due to misunderstandings about the hyperscale ...
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
eLTE Rapid Meets the Need for Speed

3|26|15   |   4:45   |   (0) comments


Designed especially for emergency and dedicated ad hoc local mobile communications coverage, Huawei's eLTE Rapid solution can deliver trunked voice, video and data coverage for multiple users over a 6km range and be set up in just 15 minutes, explains Huawei's Norman Frisch.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
On Videos: Challenges & Opportunities

3|26|15   |   5:56   |   (0) comments


Most everything is now connected. And along with 4K and 4G technologies, everyone could be creating and broadcasting video contents. Users are expecting better video experience with any screen, anywhere and anytime. Operators will meet new challenges, but also see some big opportunities.
LRTV Custom TV
JDSU: Delivering Dynamic Networks for a Personalized Experience

3|26|15   |   5:59   |   (0) comments


Light Reading speaks to JDSU at Mobile World Congress 2015 about new solutions in the areas of HetNets, VoLTE, backhaul, virtualization, big data analytics, and real-time intelligence.
LRTV Custom TV
Smarter Service Chaining & New Ways to Benefit From Qosmos Technology

3|25|15   |   03:11   |   (0) comments


David Le Goff, director of strategic and product marketing at Qosmos, explains how the company has added application awareness to subscriber information to make service chaining more efficient and reduce costs for networking and infrastructure. In addition, Qosmos technology, which has been delivered as C libraries, is now also available as a virtual machine, ...
Between the CEOs
Qosmos CEO: The Changing Face of DPI

3|24|15   |   13:53   |   (0) comments


LR CEO and Founder Steve Saunders sits down with the head of Qosmos to talk about the changing state of the art in deep packet inspection technology, including its role in SDN and NFV architectures. Also, how the comms market is becoming more like the automotive industry.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
FC Schalke Scores With Its Agile Stadium

3|24|15   |   6:23   |   (0) comments


Top German soccer club FC Schalke 04 has deployed a new, agile WiFi network from Huawei in its Veltins-Arena stadium and is reaping the benefits in terms of customer satisfaction and business opportunities, explains marketing chief Alexander Jobst.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Huawei’s Insights on Mobile Video

3|24|15   |   7:51   |   (0) comments


More people than ever are now watching videos on smartphones. Seventy percent of mobile traffic will be video traffic until 2018. In this video, Huawei's exports give their insights on mobile video in terms of business model, network planning and 4G network construction.
LRTV Documentaries
The Rise of Industry 4.0

3|24|15   |   02:26   |   (9) comments


Are you ready for the fourth industrial revolution? It's a big deal for influential operators such as Deutsche Telekom.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Getting Connected With eLTE

3|23|15   |   06:04   |   (0) comments


Trunked radio communications have entered the 4G LTE world, and with Huawei's eLTE solution, can now deliver a full range of data and video services as well as push-to-talk voice, explains Huawei's Norman Frisch.
Upcoming Live Events
April 14, 2015, The Westin Times Square, New York City, NY
May 5, 2015, Hyatt McCormick Place, Chicago, IL
May 6, 2015, Georgia World Congress, Atlanta, GA
May 12, 2015, Grand Hyatt, Denver, CO
May 13-14, 2015, The Westin Peachtree, Atlanta, GA
June 8, 2015, Chicago, IL
June 9-10, 2015, Chicago, IL
June 9, 2015, Chicago, IL
June 10, 2015, Chicago, IL
September 29-30, 2015, The Westin Grand Müchen, Munich, Germany
All Upcoming Live Events
Hot Topics
AT&T Woos SMBs With Small-Scale WiFi
Sarah Thomas, Editorial Operations Director, 3/26/2015
Just Don't Say IBM Is 'Relaunching' Networking Business
Mitch Wagner, West Coast Bureau Chief, Light Reading, 3/26/2015
Carriers Are Bright Spot in BlackBerry Q4
Sarah Thomas, Editorial Operations Director, 3/27/2015
TV Everywhere Nears Mainstream Adoption
Mari Silbey, Independent Technology Editor, 3/27/2015
Comcast Says TWC Deal Will Close Later
Mari Silbey, Independent Technology Editor, 3/26/2015
Like Us on Facebook
Twitter Feed
Webinar Archive
BETWEEN THE CEOs - Executive Interviews
LR CEO and Founder Steve Saunders sits down with the head of Qosmos to talk about the changing state of the art in deep packet inspection technology, including its role in SDN and NFV architectures.
Chattanooga’s EPB publicly owned utility comms company has become a poster child for how to enable a local economy using next-gen networking technology. Steve Saunders, Founder of Light Reading, sits down with Harold DePriest, president and CEO of EPB, to learn how EPB is bringing big time tech to small town America.
Cats with Phones
Interspecies Phone Love Click Here
"No, you hang up."
"No, YOU hang up."
Latest Comment