& cplSiteName &

Meet Tom Wheeler, Net Neutrality Procrastinator-in-Chief

Mitch Wagner
6/2/2014
50%
50%

When it's time to stand up and be counted, FCC Commissioner Tom Wheeler pulls up a chair and sits down.

In a bold decision May 15, the FCC voted 3-2 along partisan lines to go ahead and think about maybe passing its proposed net neutrality rules. The rules are a masterpiece of befuddlement, saying carriers can and can't give companies preferential Internet access. Wheeler tried to reassure net neutrality proponents that the FCC won't allow a two-tier Internet to develop, prioritizing traffic for big companies that pay for it while putting everything else in the slow lane. And yet that's precisely what the FCC's rules do -- allow carriers to charge companies for higher-speed Internet access. (See FCC Split on Net Neutrality Plans .)

Wheeler approaches decision-making with the enthusiasm of a child facing going to school on a sunny June day. And yet Wheeler is bold and decisive compared with fellow commissioners Jessica Rosenworcel and Ajit Pai, who wanted to delay the vote. Rosenworcel warned about "rushing headlong" into a decision, as if 12 years isn't enough talk. That's how long ago Columbia University law processor Tim Wu articulated the principles of net neutrality. Maybe Rosenworcel thinks we should talk about the issue for another 12 years?

Or maybe 12 years isn't long enough? Net Neutrality is based on regulations governing telegraphs dating back to 1860. Is 154 years long enough to talk about an issue?

Prior to the May 15 vote, Wheeler set out to reassure net neutrality advocates that the FCC would abide by a US Court of Appeals decision that Internet fast lanes could not be "commercially unreasonable." And yet this is no protection at all -- neither companies nor consumers have any way of knowing what's reasonable or unreasonable. Developing guidelines for what's commercially reasonable will require still more time. Yay! More meetings!

Wheeler's motivation is clear. He wants to avoid a decision. He wants to not handle net neutrality at all, run out his term as chairman of the FCC, and let the whole thing be somebody else's problem. He's following a political strategy made popular by the governor in the movie The Best Little Whorehouse in Texas: "Dance a Little Sidestep:"

Wheeler can, of course, point out that three previous FCC chairs also tried to kick this can down the road -- two succeeded and the third, immediate predecessor Julius Genachowski, passed rules that were immediately overturned on appeal. But Wheeler, in his role as advocate for first, the largest wireless industry lobby, and then, the largest cable lobby group, already lived through those debates -- shouldn't he know where he stands by now?

In his prevaricating, Wheeler has managed to tick off both sides. Democrats and net neutrality defenders are angry that Wheeler's FCC doesn't go far enough, while Republican free-marketers denounce any attempt to regulate the Internet. It takes a rare talent to tick off both sides of a polarizing issue. I'm reminded of the clueless journalist in the Carl Hiaasen novel Tourist Season who proposed opinion columns with headlines like, "Vietnam: Time to Try Again?" and "Abortion: What's the Big Deal?"

Carriers need a decision on net neutrality. The decision needs to be one that permits investment in infrastructure and innovation, while preserving people's rights to free expression and startup innovation. But even a bad decision is better than the current climate of uncertainty, which has existed as well under three previous FCC chairs.

One-hundred fifty-four years is long enough to spend making up your mind.

— Mitch Wagner, Circle me on Google+ Follow me on TwitterVisit my LinkedIn profileFollow me on Facebook, West Coast Bureau Chief, Light Reading. Got a tip about SDN or NFV? Send it to wagner@lightreading.com.

(25)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
Page 1 / 3   >   >>
mhhf1ve
50%
50%
mhhf1ve,
User Rank: Light Sabre
6/6/2014 | 2:22:25 PM
Re: The public commenting period is still going...
Seven, do you see any value in an internet search engine? I don't pay google for my searches, but there are ads. And YouTube has ads, too. Have you given up entirely on YouTube since they added ads? If not, then you are paying for the service with your attention and marketing potential.
brookseven
50%
50%
brookseven,
User Rank: Light Sabre
6/6/2014 | 1:49:41 PM
Re: The public commenting period is still going...
mhhf1ve,

How much a month are you willing to pay for YouTube?  That is the question you have to answer to put a value on it.

Let me use an analogy.  Do you go to parks that charge entrance fees?  For example, I have been to Yosemite and paid to enter.  I more often go to local parks that are "free".  Of course, they aren't free because I am paying the city to own and maintain them.  So, there is some value but it is small or as I would put it negligible.  

That is the way I see YouTube.  Do I really need to have every Chive, Funny or Die, or Tosh.0 clip up there?  No.  Is it fun to find the oddball clip.  Sure.  But if YouTube was deleted, it would not cause me to go find an equivalent service that I pay for.

Again, I think you need to think of the phone analogy.  You paid your local company.  When you made a long distance call, they would pay the tolls to your long distance provider and the terminating phone company.  If all call centers came out of 1 place, then that phone company would owe the others a lot of money.  Right now a big number (30% is a standard notion) of traffic is coming from one source.  Cogent can't expect that to be viewed as a standard symmetrical peering arrangement.  I would expect them to get a bill and pass it on to Netflix.  Netflix chose to bypass Cogent in one case.  Probably cheaper for them.

The bigger issue to me is only with Comcast as AT&T, Verizon, etc....own no content.  Only Comcast does.  I am surprised that the FCC has not forced them to drop NBC-Universal, like the way Studios has to get out of the theater business.

seven
mhhf1ve
50%
50%
mhhf1ve,
User Rank: Light Sabre
6/6/2014 | 1:02:33 PM
Re: The public commenting period is still going...
I might add that I can also understand why the FCC would do nothing. In fact, I'm also concerned about the unintended consequences of the FCC making new regulations for the internet.
mhhf1ve
50%
50%
mhhf1ve,
User Rank: Light Sabre
6/6/2014 | 12:58:49 PM
Re: The public commenting period is still going...
Seven, I'm actually fine with companies paying for faster speeds, but I also see a danger that --without any regulation-- ISPs will sneakily force every distributor to pay a non-competitive toll. I fully disagree with you that YouTube content has no value. And I don't want an internet that would kill off a service like YouTube because the ISPs would be able to charge an incredible toll for YouTube's content to be delivered reliably.
brookseven
50%
50%
brookseven,
User Rank: Light Sabre
6/5/2014 | 7:39:32 PM
Re: The public commenting period is still going...
mhhf1ve,

The Cable Industry pays BILLIONS to the content owners like Disney for the privilege of putting in the fastest of fast lanes - an HD channel + an SD channel for their content.  So, why do you think that suddenly that Disney is going to pay anybody?  They have content that people want.  We know that because we pay for it.

Youtube has no value because it essentially has worthless content.  Free content is worth exactly what you pay for it.  Nothing.  If there was value, we would pay to watch it.

Netflix is already trying to get into the content ownership business because of this.  They know that as a middle man, they have very minimal value.  The Internet is working real hard to eliminate most middle men.  The only people that needs middle men are small players who can't keep up.  

I agree you have the right to put content up and distribute it.  If you are Ernest Hemingway or Steven Spielberg or Metallica then you get to get paid for doing so.  If you are not, then expect to have to pay a middleman.  

Next thing to think about.  So, are you going to force cable tv systems to eliminate all their channels and deploy all their bandwidth for net neutral internet?  If not, you have already lost the thought that all content is created equal.  Disney, Fox, Sony, Viacom, etc. are all getting paid to have the best possible fast lane created for them.  

Now let's go to the Title II idea.  So, in the phone world assymetric traffic requires compensation between carriers.  So, we would need to put a system like that in place for the ISPs.  You okay with that?  Oh, wait....that is what you are complaining about already.  Now, I like the Title II idea but I am just saying that I can understand the notion of not doing anything.

seven
mhhf1ve
50%
50%
mhhf1ve,
User Rank: Light Sabre
6/5/2014 | 4:31:05 PM
Re: The public commenting period is still going...
So Disney has leverage, and netflix does not. So netflix has no value? There's a bit of a leap of logic there that doesn't quite make sense. Plenty of consumers pay for netflix and find value in the service. But there are other entities that might be harmed by a non-neutral internet. YouTube doesn't have the same leverage as Disney does-- is it also a worthless middle man? Are content owners the only entities that have the right to equal expression on the internet?
Mitch Wagner
50%
50%
Mitch Wagner,
User Rank: Lightning
6/5/2014 | 3:50:19 PM
Re: The public commenting period is still going...
mhhf1ve - He can justify it by saying that even a small minority can generate a massive flood of feedback. And that they're all just fickle and following what Stephen Colbert says and don't care deeply about the issues. Or that the industry voices understand the technology and business needs better. 

A cynic would say that the floods of people who hit the FCC website aren't campaign contributors, and that money is what talks in Washington.
brookseven
50%
50%
brookseven,
User Rank: Light Sabre
6/5/2014 | 3:37:36 PM
Re: The public commenting period is still going...
 

Let Comcast ask Disney for streaming money and see what happens.  My guess is the cost of EPSN goes to $1B per home served.  Then Comcast gets on their knees and begs for mercy.

In other words, be a content owner - don't be a middle man.  The value of being a middle man like Netflix is essentlally 0.

seven

 
mhhf1ve
50%
50%
mhhf1ve,
User Rank: Light Sabre
6/5/2014 | 2:50:55 PM
Re: The public commenting period is still going...
Nothing is broken? So it's just fine for comcast to require video streaming companies (besides netflix) to pay for faster delivery? What if search engines needed to pay more for reliable connections? Where do the tolls end?
brookseven
50%
50%
brookseven,
User Rank: Light Sabre
6/5/2014 | 12:40:41 AM
Re: The public commenting period is still going...
Mhhf1ve, What happened recently was that the courts left that as the only option for regulating Internet Service. The thing is that the change to use Title II is a one way street. Right now, as far as I can tell, nothing is broken. So, why make the switch now? To protect Netflix? Other than that, Hulu will never have that problem. It will end up the other way around. ISPs will pay Hulu for the privilege of delivering their content. This is why Netflix is trying to change to a content maker. Remember content ALWAYS gets paid. Content has always gotten paid by al distribution channels and always will. Aggregators (Netflix) are just middle men. Seven
Page 1 / 3   >   >>
More Blogs from Column
In the second of a three-part series, OpenCloud's Jeff Gordon delves deeper into the driving forces for adopting a converged service layer.
Edge computing is a compelling option for telcos looking to balance tightening finances with increasing demands for bandwidth and processing speed. 
The conclusions of a new survey, commissioned by OpenCloud and conducted by Heavy Reading, suggests that the move towards converged service layers is now well underway.
WiFi is offering a challenge to the network-centric cellular status quo and that's something that mobile network operator CEOs recognize, believes Devicescape CEO Dave Fraser.
NFV can bring operational headaches as well as operational gains, argues Andy Huckridge.
From The Founder
The independent evaluation of Nokia's key virtual network functions (VNFs) was a defining moment for the Finnish giant.
Flash Poll
Live Streaming Video
Charting the CSP’s Future
Six different communications service providers join to debate their visions of the future CSP, following a landmark presentation from AT&T on its massive virtualization efforts and a look back on where the telecom industry has been and where it’s going from two industry veterans.
LRTV Custom TV
Cisco's Innovations in Cable

5|26|16   |   03:18   |   (0) comments


Marc Aldrich from Cisco discusses the latest in security, the evolution and momentum for CCAP and what the industry will be seeing next from Cisco.
LRTV Documentaries
Leading Lights 2016 Highlights

5|25|16   |   02:26   |   (1) comment


Some of the high points from this year's Leading Lights awards dinner at the Hotel Ella in Austin, Texas.
LRTV Documentaries
Light Reading Hall of Fame 2016

5|23|16   |   05:43   |   (0) comments


Find out who has been welcomed into Light Reading's Hall of Fame this year.
LRTV Custom TV
ZTE TM Forum Highlights

5|23|16   |     |   (0) comments


ZTE showcased its new ICT solutions at TM Forum in Nice.
LRTV Interviews
Gamma's MD on the Emergence of UC2

5|20|16   |     |   (0) comments


Gamma Communications Managing Director David Macfarlane believes the unified communications (UC) market has reached a tipping point.
LRTV Custom TV
The Ultimate 5-Minute Guide to Digital Customer Engagement

5|20|16   |     |   (0) comments


In this short video, you will hear all about how Digital Customer Engagement is the key to meeting customer expectations, keeping them happy, and maximizing revenue. VP Product & Marketing at Pontis, Ofer Razon, breaks down for us the five essential capabilities for successful Digital Customer Engagement. Don’t miss!
LRTV Custom TV
NFV in 2016: Part 1 – NFV Use Cases Get Real

5|19|16   |   05:57   |   (0) comments


Consensus is building around the key use cases for NFV, including managed IP services at the network edge and on customer premises, which can generate new revenues from enterprises/SMBs and consumers; Evolved Packet Core to support LTE migration; and adjacent technologies, such as TAS and IMS, to support VoLTE and next-generation charging and policy control ...
LRTV Custom TV
Nokia's Steve Vogelsang on NFV – Part 3

5|19|16   |     |   (0) comments


Steve Vogelsang discusses the challenges of operational transformation and how Nokia helps its customers. Join Steve at the Big Communications Event in Austin the morning of May 24, on his keynote and optical networking panel.
LRTV Interviews
Level 3: Why UC Is In Demand

5|17|16   |   04:12   |   (1) comment


Andrew Edison, Level 3's senior VP of sales, EMEA region, talks about the drivers of growth in the unified communications services market.
LRTV Custom TV
ARM's OPNFV Action

5|17|16   |     |   (0) comments


At the ARM booth at MWC 2016, Joe Kidder and Bob Monkman speak to Light Reading about OPNFV and their upcoming action.
LRTV Custom TV
Nokia's Steve Vogelsang on NFV – Part 2

5|16|16   |     |   (0) comments


Steve Vogelsang gives advice to service providers on how to move to NFV. Join Steve at the Big Communications Event in Austin the morning of May 24, on his keynote and optical networking panel.
LRTV Interviews
Interoute CTO on NFV's Maturity

5|13|16   |   06:46   |   (1) comment


Matt Finnie, CTO at international operator Interoute, explains how NFV has made life easier in terms of logistics and how Interoute can now enable a 'software-defined moment' for its customers.
Upcoming Live Events
September 13-14, 2016, The Curtis Hotel, Denver, CO
December 6-8, 2016,
June 16-18, 2017, Austin Convention Center, Austin, TX
All Upcoming Live Events
Infographics
A new survey conducted by Heavy Reading and TM Forum shows that CSPs around the world see the move to digital operations as a necessary part of their overall virtualization strategies.
Hot Topics
DT: Telcos Must Escape Vendor Prison
Iain Morris, News Editor, 5/24/2016
AT&T to Start 5G 'Friendly' Trial by 2016 End
Dan Jones, Mobile Editor, 5/24/2016
Cisco's Patel Hails 'Microculture' Successes
Iain Morris, News Editor, 5/26/2016
Cable Is Eyeing Its Retail Options
Mari Silbey, Senior Editor, Cable/Video, 5/25/2016
AT&T's Margaret Chiosi Retires
Ray Le Maistre, Editor-in-chief, 5/25/2016
Like Us on Facebook
Twitter Feed
BETWEEN THE CEOs - Executive Interviews
In this latest installment of the CEO Chat series, Craig Labovitz, co-founder and CEO of Deepfield, sits down with Light Reading's Steve Saunders in Light Reading's New York City office to discuss how Deepfield fits in with the big data trend and more.
Grant van Rooyen, president and CEO of Cologix, sits down with Steve Saunders, founder and CEO of Light Reading, in the vendor's New Jersey facility to offer an inside look at the company's success story and discuss the importance of security in the telecom industry.
Animals with Phones
Live Digital Audio

Our world has evolved through innovation from the Industrial Revolution of the 1740s to the information age, and it is now entering the Fourth Industrial Revolution, driven by technology. Technology is driving a paradigm shift in the way digital solutions deliver a connected world, changing the way we live, communicate and provide solutions. It can have a powerful impact on how we tackle some of the world’s most pressing problems. In this radio show, Caroline Dowling, President of Communications Infrastructure & Enterprise Computing at Flex, will join Women in Comms Director Sarah Thomas to discuss the impact technology has on society and how it can be a game-changer across the globe; improving lives and creating a smarter world. Dowling, a Cork, Ireland, native and graduate of Harvard Business School's Advanced Management Program, will also discuss her experience managing an international team focused on innovation in an age of high-speed change.