Light Reading

Meet Tom Wheeler, Net Neutrality Procrastinator-in-Chief

Mitch Wagner
6/2/2014
50%
50%

When it's time to stand up and be counted, FCC Commissioner Tom Wheeler pulls up a chair and sits down.

In a bold decision May 15, the FCC voted 3-2 along partisan lines to go ahead and think about maybe passing its proposed net neutrality rules. The rules are a masterpiece of befuddlement, saying carriers can and can't give companies preferential Internet access. Wheeler tried to reassure net neutrality proponents that the FCC won't allow a two-tier Internet to develop, prioritizing traffic for big companies that pay for it while putting everything else in the slow lane. And yet that's precisely what the FCC's rules do -- allow carriers to charge companies for higher-speed Internet access. (See FCC Split on Net Neutrality Plans .)

Wheeler approaches decision-making with the enthusiasm of a child facing going to school on a sunny June day. And yet Wheeler is bold and decisive compared with fellow commissioners Jessica Rosenworcel and Ajit Pai, who wanted to delay the vote. Rosenworcel warned about "rushing headlong" into a decision, as if 12 years isn't enough talk. That's how long ago Columbia University law processor Tim Wu articulated the principles of net neutrality. Maybe Rosenworcel thinks we should talk about the issue for another 12 years?

Or maybe 12 years isn't long enough? Net Neutrality is based on regulations governing telegraphs dating back to 1860. Is 154 years long enough to talk about an issue?

Prior to the May 15 vote, Wheeler set out to reassure net neutrality advocates that the FCC would abide by a US Court of Appeals decision that Internet fast lanes could not be "commercially unreasonable." And yet this is no protection at all -- neither companies nor consumers have any way of knowing what's reasonable or unreasonable. Developing guidelines for what's commercially reasonable will require still more time. Yay! More meetings!

Wheeler's motivation is clear. He wants to avoid a decision. He wants to not handle net neutrality at all, run out his term as chairman of the FCC, and let the whole thing be somebody else's problem. He's following a political strategy made popular by the governor in the movie The Best Little Whorehouse in Texas: "Dance a Little Sidestep:"

Wheeler can, of course, point out that three previous FCC chairs also tried to kick this can down the road -- two succeeded and the third, immediate predecessor Julius Genachowski, passed rules that were immediately overturned on appeal. But Wheeler, in his role as advocate for first, the largest wireless industry lobby, and then, the largest cable lobby group, already lived through those debates -- shouldn't he know where he stands by now?

In his prevaricating, Wheeler has managed to tick off both sides. Democrats and net neutrality defenders are angry that Wheeler's FCC doesn't go far enough, while Republican free-marketers denounce any attempt to regulate the Internet. It takes a rare talent to tick off both sides of a polarizing issue. I'm reminded of the clueless journalist in the Carl Hiaasen novel Tourist Season who proposed opinion columns with headlines like, "Vietnam: Time to Try Again?" and "Abortion: What's the Big Deal?"

Carriers need a decision on net neutrality. The decision needs to be one that permits investment in infrastructure and innovation, while preserving people's rights to free expression and startup innovation. But even a bad decision is better than the current climate of uncertainty, which has existed as well under three previous FCC chairs.

One-hundred fifty-four years is long enough to spend making up your mind.

— Mitch Wagner, Circle me on Google+ Follow me on TwitterVisit my LinkedIn profileFollow me on Facebook, West Coast Bureau Chief, Light Reading. Got a tip about SDN or NFV? Send it to wagner@lightreading.com.

(25)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
Page 1 / 3   >   >>
mhhf1ve
50%
50%
mhhf1ve,
User Rank: Light Sabre
6/6/2014 | 2:22:25 PM
Re: The public commenting period is still going...
Seven, do you see any value in an internet search engine? I don't pay google for my searches, but there are ads. And YouTube has ads, too. Have you given up entirely on YouTube since they added ads? If not, then you are paying for the service with your attention and marketing potential.
brookseven
50%
50%
brookseven,
User Rank: Light Sabre
6/6/2014 | 1:49:41 PM
Re: The public commenting period is still going...
mhhf1ve,

How much a month are you willing to pay for YouTube?  That is the question you have to answer to put a value on it.

Let me use an analogy.  Do you go to parks that charge entrance fees?  For example, I have been to Yosemite and paid to enter.  I more often go to local parks that are "free".  Of course, they aren't free because I am paying the city to own and maintain them.  So, there is some value but it is small or as I would put it negligible.  

That is the way I see YouTube.  Do I really need to have every Chive, Funny or Die, or Tosh.0 clip up there?  No.  Is it fun to find the oddball clip.  Sure.  But if YouTube was deleted, it would not cause me to go find an equivalent service that I pay for.

Again, I think you need to think of the phone analogy.  You paid your local company.  When you made a long distance call, they would pay the tolls to your long distance provider and the terminating phone company.  If all call centers came out of 1 place, then that phone company would owe the others a lot of money.  Right now a big number (30% is a standard notion) of traffic is coming from one source.  Cogent can't expect that to be viewed as a standard symmetrical peering arrangement.  I would expect them to get a bill and pass it on to Netflix.  Netflix chose to bypass Cogent in one case.  Probably cheaper for them.

The bigger issue to me is only with Comcast as AT&T, Verizon, etc....own no content.  Only Comcast does.  I am surprised that the FCC has not forced them to drop NBC-Universal, like the way Studios has to get out of the theater business.

seven
mhhf1ve
50%
50%
mhhf1ve,
User Rank: Light Sabre
6/6/2014 | 1:02:33 PM
Re: The public commenting period is still going...
I might add that I can also understand why the FCC would do nothing. In fact, I'm also concerned about the unintended consequences of the FCC making new regulations for the internet.
mhhf1ve
50%
50%
mhhf1ve,
User Rank: Light Sabre
6/6/2014 | 12:58:49 PM
Re: The public commenting period is still going...
Seven, I'm actually fine with companies paying for faster speeds, but I also see a danger that --without any regulation-- ISPs will sneakily force every distributor to pay a non-competitive toll. I fully disagree with you that YouTube content has no value. And I don't want an internet that would kill off a service like YouTube because the ISPs would be able to charge an incredible toll for YouTube's content to be delivered reliably.
brookseven
50%
50%
brookseven,
User Rank: Light Sabre
6/5/2014 | 7:39:32 PM
Re: The public commenting period is still going...
mhhf1ve,

The Cable Industry pays BILLIONS to the content owners like Disney for the privilege of putting in the fastest of fast lanes - an HD channel + an SD channel for their content.  So, why do you think that suddenly that Disney is going to pay anybody?  They have content that people want.  We know that because we pay for it.

Youtube has no value because it essentially has worthless content.  Free content is worth exactly what you pay for it.  Nothing.  If there was value, we would pay to watch it.

Netflix is already trying to get into the content ownership business because of this.  They know that as a middle man, they have very minimal value.  The Internet is working real hard to eliminate most middle men.  The only people that needs middle men are small players who can't keep up.  

I agree you have the right to put content up and distribute it.  If you are Ernest Hemingway or Steven Spielberg or Metallica then you get to get paid for doing so.  If you are not, then expect to have to pay a middleman.  

Next thing to think about.  So, are you going to force cable tv systems to eliminate all their channels and deploy all their bandwidth for net neutral internet?  If not, you have already lost the thought that all content is created equal.  Disney, Fox, Sony, Viacom, etc. are all getting paid to have the best possible fast lane created for them.  

Now let's go to the Title II idea.  So, in the phone world assymetric traffic requires compensation between carriers.  So, we would need to put a system like that in place for the ISPs.  You okay with that?  Oh, wait....that is what you are complaining about already.  Now, I like the Title II idea but I am just saying that I can understand the notion of not doing anything.

seven
mhhf1ve
50%
50%
mhhf1ve,
User Rank: Light Sabre
6/5/2014 | 4:31:05 PM
Re: The public commenting period is still going...
So Disney has leverage, and netflix does not. So netflix has no value? There's a bit of a leap of logic there that doesn't quite make sense. Plenty of consumers pay for netflix and find value in the service. But there are other entities that might be harmed by a non-neutral internet. YouTube doesn't have the same leverage as Disney does-- is it also a worthless middle man? Are content owners the only entities that have the right to equal expression on the internet?
Mitch Wagner
50%
50%
Mitch Wagner,
User Rank: Lightning
6/5/2014 | 3:50:19 PM
Re: The public commenting period is still going...
mhhf1ve - He can justify it by saying that even a small minority can generate a massive flood of feedback. And that they're all just fickle and following what Stephen Colbert says and don't care deeply about the issues. Or that the industry voices understand the technology and business needs better. 

A cynic would say that the floods of people who hit the FCC website aren't campaign contributors, and that money is what talks in Washington.
brookseven
50%
50%
brookseven,
User Rank: Light Sabre
6/5/2014 | 3:37:36 PM
Re: The public commenting period is still going...
 

Let Comcast ask Disney for streaming money and see what happens.  My guess is the cost of EPSN goes to $1B per home served.  Then Comcast gets on their knees and begs for mercy.

In other words, be a content owner - don't be a middle man.  The value of being a middle man like Netflix is essentlally 0.

seven

 
mhhf1ve
50%
50%
mhhf1ve,
User Rank: Light Sabre
6/5/2014 | 2:50:55 PM
Re: The public commenting period is still going...
Nothing is broken? So it's just fine for comcast to require video streaming companies (besides netflix) to pay for faster delivery? What if search engines needed to pay more for reliable connections? Where do the tolls end?
brookseven
50%
50%
brookseven,
User Rank: Light Sabre
6/5/2014 | 12:40:41 AM
Re: The public commenting period is still going...
Mhhf1ve, What happened recently was that the courts left that as the only option for regulating Internet Service. The thing is that the change to use Title II is a one way street. Right now, as far as I can tell, nothing is broken. So, why make the switch now? To protect Netflix? Other than that, Hulu will never have that problem. It will end up the other way around. ISPs will pay Hulu for the privilege of delivering their content. This is why Netflix is trying to change to a content maker. Remember content ALWAYS gets paid. Content has always gotten paid by al distribution channels and always will. Aggregators (Netflix) are just middle men. Seven
Page 1 / 3   >   >>
More Blogs from Column
There is an impressive array of technology that is planned for the transition to 5G that will enable many new possible services.
5G could shape up to be a stunningly expensive fiasco.
The Swedish vendor has undergone a significant transformation during the past few years, adjusting to the demands of next-generation communications companies.
Wi-Fi Alliance members have created Wi-Fi Aware technology to bring local experiences to life -- without requiring access to the Internet or GPS.
Bamboozled by the flood of abbreviations and acronyms that SDN and NFV have inspired? Here's a guide to some of the key standards bodies whose initials you will need to know.
Flash Poll
From The Founder
Ericsson's Hyperscale Datacenter System (HDS) 8000, featuring Intel's Rack Scale Architecture, caused a stir when it was announced at MWC 2015. For more on this revolutionary product, join me on Thursday, April 30 at 12:00 p.m. EST for a Super Webinar event, A New Hardware Paradigm for the Telco Data Center.
LRTV Documentaries
CableLabs' Clarke Updates Cable Virtualization

4|23|15   |   05:41   |   (1) comment


Former BT exec now leading CableLabs' NFV and SDN efforts explains key role of open source and updates efforts to virtualize the home network.
LRTV Interviews
Ericsson's CTO Talks Transformation: Pt. II

4|23|15   |   08:19   |   (1) comment


In the second installment of an in-depth two-part interview, Ericsson's CTO Ulf Ewaldsson talks to Light Reading CEO and founder Steve Saunders about cultural change, network slicing and technology advances.
LRTV Interviews
Ericsson's CTO Talks Transformation: Pt. I

4|23|15   |   09:27   |   (3) comments


In the first installment of an in-depth two-part interview, Ericsson's CTO Ulf Ewaldsson talks to Light Reading CEO and founder Steve Saunders about the incredible transformation underway in the communications networking industry.
LRTV Documentaries
LTE Paves the Way for the 5G Revolution

4|20|15   |   4:20   |   (0) comments


Håkan Andersson, head of 5G product strategy of the Radio Business Unit at Ericsson, discusses the role of LTE, the US and other industry verticals in building a true 5G ecosystem.
LRTV Documentaries
The 3GPP's Road to 5G Standardization

4|17|15   |   4:43   |   (0) comments


Satoshi Nagata, chairman of the 3GPP's TSG-RAN group and a manager at NTT Docomo, explains the standardization process for 5G, as well as the biggest challenges and opportunities.
LRTV Documentaries
AlcaLu CTO Makes the Case for a New 5G Air Interface

4|16|15   |   3:54   |   (0) comments


Michael Peeters, CTO of wireless at Alcatel-Lucent, explains why 5G will require a new air interface to meet its diverse performance targets.
LRTV Documentaries
AlcaLu + Nokia: The New Uber-Vendor

4|15|15   |   2:42   |   (4) comments


Heavy Reading Senior Analyst Gabriel Brown discusses the technological and competitive opportunities and challenges if a merger between Alcatel-Lucent and Nokia comes to pass.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Huawei's Data Center Power Play

4|15|15   |   6:22   |   (0) comments


Huawei has developed industry-leading energy efficiency capabilities for its indoor and outdoor data center solutions, explains Dr. Fang Liangzhou, vice president of Huawei's Network Energy product Line.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Huawei’s Routers, Switches Get the Green Mark

4|15|15   |   2:02   |   (0) comments


TUV Rheinland's Frank Dudley explains how Huawei's routers and switches have been successfully tested by energy efficiency experts and have gained Green Mark Certification.
LRTV Documentaries
A Finn, a Frenchman & a Guy From New Jersey Walk Into a Merger...

4|15|15   |   3:17   |   (0) comments


Stop us if you've heard this one before... Light Reading CEO Founder & CEO Steve Saunders weighs in on the technical and cultural implications of a Nokia and Alcatel-Lucent merger.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Accounting for Better Solutions

4|10|15   |   02:31   |   (1) comment


Murad Yousuf, CTO at Saudi Arabia's Ministry of Finance (Dept. of Zakat & Income Tax), talks about the benefits of deploying router technology from Huawei.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
What's in Store for Huawei & DataCore?

4|10|15   |   05:44   |   (0) comments


At the CeBIT trade show in Hannover, Germany, George Teixeira, CEO of software-defined storage (SDS) specialist DataCore Software, explains why he has just signed a partnership agreement with Huawei Technologies.
Upcoming Live Events
May 6, 2015, Georgia World Congress, Atlanta, GA
May 12, 2015, Grand Hyatt, Denver, CO
May 13-14, 2015, The Westin Peachtree, Atlanta, GA
June 8, 2015, Chicago, IL
June 9-10, 2015, Chicago, IL
June 9, 2015, Chicago, IL
June 10, 2015, Chicago, IL
September 29-30, 2015, The Westin Grand Müchen, Munich, Germany
October 6, 2015, Westin Peachtree Plaza, Atlanta, GA
November 11-12, 2015, The Westin Peachtree Plaza, Atlanta, GA
All Upcoming Live Events
Infographics
In its latest survey covering network operators' plans and strategies for ICT transformation, Heavy Reading asked telecom operators worldwide to identify the most important goals and objectives for their ICT transformation initiatives. Heavy Reading also asked operators about the importance of a "digital first" strategy, which enables customers to complete an interaction across different digital channels, such as web and mobile self-service and social media.
Hot Topics
Comcast Formally Ends Its Bid for TWC
Mari Silbey, Independent Technology Editor, 4/24/2015
What if the Comcast Merger Fails?
Mari Silbey, Independent Technology Editor, 4/20/2015
Google's WiFi-First Mobile Service 'Fi' Is Here
Dan Jones, Mobile Editor, 4/22/2015
Adtran Is Developing White Box GPON Tech
Ray Le Maistre, Editor-in-chief, 4/24/2015
Comcast Merger May Hinge on Hulu
Mari Silbey, Independent Technology Editor, 4/22/2015
Like Us on Facebook
Twitter Feed
Webinar Archive
BETWEEN THE CEOs - Executive Interviews
Many leading communications companies can claim to have undergone significant periods of reinvention during their histories, but none have been through more major ...
Data Center Interconnect, or DCI, is one of the hottest sectors in telecom currently. Since coming back to Light Reading last year, prodigal-son style, I've ...
Cats with Phones
Learning Curve Click Here
Pierre could never remember how to use Excel.
Latest Comment