& cplSiteName &

Oclaro & Opnext Strive for Scale

Craig Matsumoto
3/27/2012
50%
50%

A primary motivation for Oclaro Inc. (Nasdaq: OCLR) and Opnext Inc. (Nasdaq: OPXT) to merge, a move they announced late Monday, is to create a company big enough to stand a long-term chance of supplying major customers.

That should sound familiar, because it's the rationale that was behind the 2009 merger of Avanex and Bookham that created Oclaro.

That was a long-awaited event that many people worried would drown both companies, considering each had had trouble cutting costs and making any profits. Oclaro and Opnext are both expected to report losses for the next few quarters, but the companies apparently believe their combined scale is necessary.

Oclaro and Opnext overlap in relatively few product areas, so it's not a case of saving money by making massive cuts. Rather, the deal is about setting up prospects for the future, says analyst Karen Liu of Ovum Ltd.

"I don't think they were endangered" before announcing the merger, she says. "But I think the ability to grow was limited."

A wider scope would also give equipment vendors a better reason to consider Oclaro/Opnext a critical supplier.

"When we merged Bookham and Avanex, we became a Tier 1 supplier to our customers," Oclaro CEO Alain Couder said on Monday afternoon's conference call with analysts. "Now it's going to be even more [so], because we are going to have all the core technology needed" for future developments, he said.

The deal would also put the combined company on a more level footing with Finisar Corp. (Nasdaq: FNSR) and JDSU (Nasdaq: JDSU; Toronto: JDU), in terms of revenues.

Table 1: Optical Components Revenues

Company Revenues, past four reported quarters (in millions)
Finisar $949.6
JDSU $755.2
Oclaro+Opnext $744.7
Oclaro alone $417.2
Opnext alone $327.5
Source: Yahoo Finance, Seeking Alpha


A point worth noting at this juncture: Oclaro and Opnext, combined, would have overtaken JDSU by now in terms of annual revenues, were it not for the 2011 floods in Thailand, Oclaro Chief Marketing Officer Yves LeMaitre tells Light Reading. Opnext's production at contract manufacturer Fabrinet Co. Ltd. (NYSE:FN) was hurt more than most by that natural disaster. (See Optical Industry Adjusting After Thai Floods.)

Indirectly, the combined company would be going on the offense against smaller suppliers, blocking them from joining the Tier 1 club.

"The customer will only work with the smaller guy if they cannot get what they want from the top three," LeMaitre says. "There are companies -- I don't want to give names -- with one cool product or two cool products, and they're really struggling to get to the next level. With this merger, we make it almost impossible."

One area where Oclaro and Opnext would save some money is in development of 40Gbit/s and 100Gbit/s modules -- something both companies were working on. (See Oclaro Joins Opnext at 100G.)

Both companies also plan to move test and assembly to lower-cost venues. Oclaro has been moving those functions to a contract manufacturer in Malaysia, taking them out of Oclaro-owned facilities in Zurich and in Shenzhen, China. Similarly, the Opnext test and assembly facilities in Japan and California could be moved to a more cost-efficient location in the Asia/Pacific region. (See Oclaro Preps Malaysian Move.)

The combined company would hang onto its five semiconductor fabs, though, he said. That points to the trend of vertical integration that's been happening in optics, with all of the remaining large companies owning fabs. In particular, the opportunities to reduce costs in optical modules are likely to come from inventions at the chip level, Couder said.

— Craig Matsumoto, Managing Editor, Light Reading

(17)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
gtchavan
50%
50%
gtchavan,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:38:05 PM
re: Oclaro & Opnext Strive for Scale
At least from their own perspective optical sector is undervalued.
Chhilar
50%
50%
Chhilar,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:38:03 PM
re: Oclaro & Opnext Strive for Scale


 "There are companies -- I don't want to give names -- with one cool product or two cool products, and they're really struggling to get to the next level. With this merger, we make it almost impossible."


 


The merger makes it impossible for some of their customers to get to the next level?  That doesn't sound like a positive thing at all.

Pete Baldwin
50%
50%
Pete Baldwin,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:38:02 PM
re: Oclaro & Opnext Strive for Scale


RGru -- sorry for leaving that unclear; he's talking about his competitors, not his customers.

4mTx
50%
50%
4mTx,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:38:00 PM
re: Oclaro & Opnext Strive for Scale


Apart from the big question of profitabilty of the merged entity, what do you think they are going to call themselves? Any ideas Craig :)?

Balet
50%
50%
Balet,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:37:59 PM
re: Oclaro & Opnext Strive for Scale


I wonder which smaller competitors would they block?


Finisar, JDSU, Opnclaro - who else is left, who might embark on so broad area of optical components across the board?


There are plenty of 1-2 product's companies for their market; then ever slow NEL...Then, whole China...


Anybody else?

Balet
50%
50%
Balet,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:37:58 PM
re: Oclaro & Opnext Strive for Scale


Craig,


Thanks. Then, you can add Enablence too?


IMHO, Emcore and Neo fell into the same traps of having predominately Chinese engineers and manufacturing. Everything must be "cheap", innovation levels are low. Using high quality materials? "They are not cheap!".


I believe the strength of the top three component makers comes from investing into new technologies and products and keeping enough designers in the western world.

Pete Baldwin
50%
50%
Pete Baldwin,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:37:58 PM
re: Oclaro & Opnext Strive for Scale


Balet -- I think it's the onesey-twosey companies he was referring to. Maybe also the next-tier players, like Emcore and even NeoPhotonics.

Pete Baldwin
50%
50%
Pete Baldwin,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:37:58 PM
re: Oclaro & Opnext Strive for Scale


> Apart from the big question of profitabilty of the merged entity, what do you think they are going to call themselves?


I like Balet's idea of Opnclaro. :)


Realistically, I think they'll just stick with "Oclaro." It's really an acquisition, just one where the acquired party retains a very strong voice in the merged company.


(Actually, Bookham/Avanex was also an acquisition, but I think they wanted to change the branding to shed the bad times of the preceding 7 or 8 years. Just a guess.)


Chhilar
50%
50%
Chhilar,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:37:57 PM
re: Oclaro & Opnext Strive for Scale


Thank you for the clarification.  That makes sense now.

redface
50%
50%
redface,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:37:55 PM
re: Oclaro & Opnext Strive for Scale


"Anybody else?"


 


How about Coadna, Optoplex, Bayspec, Dicon Fiberoptics, Capella, Lightwaves 2020, AC Photonics, etc.  There are still quite a number of smaller players other than the big three.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Featured Video
From The Founder
Light Reading founder Steve Saunders talks with VMware's Shekar Ayyar, who explains why cloud architectures are becoming more distributed, what that means for workloads, and why telcos can still be significant cloud services players.
Flash Poll
Upcoming Live Events
June 26, 2018, Nice, France
September 12, 2018, Los Angeles, CA
September 24-26, 2018, Westin Westminster, Denver
October 9, 2018, The Westin Times Square, New York
October 17, 2018, Chicago, Illinois
October 23, 2018, Georgia World Congress Centre, Atlanta, GA
November 7-8, 2018, London, United Kingdom
November 8, 2018, The Montcalm by Marble Arch, London
November 15, 2018, The Westin Times Square, New York
December 4-6, 2018, Lisbon, Portugal
All Upcoming Live Events
Hot Topics
Telus CTO: NFV Burden May Cripple Telcos
Iain Morris, News Editor, 5/14/2018
TM Forum Sea-Change Overcomes That Sinking Feeling
Iain Morris, News Editor, 5/17/2018
Verizon CEO Says LA Is Second 5G City
Dan Jones, Mobile Editor, 5/16/2018
Animals with Phones
Live Digital Audio

A CSP's digital transformation involves so much more than technology. Crucial – and often most challenging – is the cultural transformation that goes along with it. As Sigma's Chief Technology Officer, Catherine Michel has extensive experience with technology as she leads the company's entire product portfolio and strategy. But she's also no stranger to merging technology and culture, having taken a company — Tribold — from inception to acquisition (by Sigma in 2013), and she continues to advise service providers on how to drive their own transformations. This impressive female leader and vocal advocate for other women in the industry will join Women in Comms for a live radio show to discuss all things digital transformation, including the cultural transformation that goes along with it.

Like Us on Facebook
Twitter Feed
Partner Perspectives - content from our sponsors
Swisscom: Quick off the Blocks With 5G
By Gary Maidment, for Huawei
SAIL the Atlantic With CAMTEL
By Gary Maidment, for Huawei
What's in the Box?
By Huawei
Beginning With the End In Mind
By Kevin Taylor, for Huawei
All Partner Perspectives