& cplSiteName &

SDN Is Hype & NFV a Faux Pas – Telecom Panel

Iain Morris
4/12/2018
50%
50%

PARIS -- MPLS, SDN and NFV World Congress 2018 -- There must have been something in the coffee in Paris this week.

Panel sessions at trade shows are often a reality check for the industry, but to hear one deliver such a negative assessment of a technology in the limelight is unusual.

Executives from Orange and Telefónica on the telco side, Nokia Corp. (NYSE: NOK) and RAD Data Communications Ltd. in the vendor community and Google (Nasdaq: GOOG) from the Internet world were asked here in Paris to consider whether SDN and NFV were mainly hype or reality. And their discussion came down firmly on the side of hype.

That is a bit of a wake-up call for the wider industry. SDN and NFV have now been around for several years. Orange (NYSE: FTE) and Telefónica, moreover, are typically seen as pioneers when it comes to investment in these technologies. Telefónica was one of the first European giants to make a big commitment to virtualization when it announced its Unica program in 2014. Orange said it had moved into the "industrial phase" of NFV deployment in October. (See Orange Moves to 'Industrial' NFV Phase, Will Start in Spain and Telefónica Unveils Aggressive NFV Plans.)

But that did not prevent Stephane Litkowski, a network architect with Orange, from questioning the rationale for spending money on SDN and NFV technologies.

"In my view SDN is still hype and not really a new concept," he told an audience at this week's MPLS, SDN and NFV World Congress in Paris. "The centralization of network management is something we've been able to do for years. It seems we are never really investing in new things but reusing concepts because we can never find a good trade-off. Centralization has its advantages but there is also a need for distribution. I would never set up a network when I have only a single controller because what happens if it fails?"

Israeli vendor RAD also joined in the SDN and NFV bashing, with Yaakov Stein, the company's chief technology officer, suggesting SDN is a "bubble" and questioning NFV's cost benefits.

"When you are doing network functions out in the network, the question is whether you are really saving money by using generic instead of optimized hardware," he said.


To compete with the OTT players, telcos need to be nimbler by accelerating network automation. Join us in Austin, Texas from May 14-16 for our fifth annual Big Communications Event as we tackle challenges like automation. The event is free for communications service providers -- secure your seat today!


RAD, of course, has legacy as well as SDN and NFV products in its portfolio, but Litkowski agreed with Stein's remarks. "The cost of the power needed with generic hardware is not really economical," he pointed out. "NFV is a reality but is it the reality we wanted?"

On a more positive note, the Orange executive suggested the use of field programmable gate arrays (or FGPAs), which are customizable integrated circuits, might help to make NFV a more welcome reality. "With network functions we have very special requirements and the main pain point is still performance and the determinism of packet processing," he said.

For Nokia's Wim Henderickx, the main challenge is on the applications side. "The applications people still look at the network as though it is from the past," he said. "They are still relying on Layer 2-based resiliency mechanisms and applying the physical world in a virtual environment. We are missing specifications on how apps should run in the cloud and as a result there is complexity in the onboarding element."

Coming several hours after Google's Vijoy Pandey had talked about the Internet giant's investments in intent-based networking tools, to support further automation of its data centers and backbone networks, this was all rather worrying, despite the jocular tone of the panel discussion. If they are not about cost, SDN and NFV are supposed to aid telco agility and speed to market. Yet technology executives are still voicing doubts more than four years after Telefónica first mentioned Unica. For the industry's sake, one must hope the discussion has moved on this time next year. (See Google Has Intent to Cut Humans Out of Network.)

— Iain Morris, News Editor, Light Reading

(14)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
kq4ym
50%
50%
kq4ym,
User Rank: Light Sabre
4/23/2018 | 12:22:55 PM
Re: SDN
It must have been a bit of a surprise  for some in the audience to hear the panel speak candidly on the issues and it does maybe seem that as noted " the question is whether you are really saving money by using generic instead of optimized hardware," and it some cases probably no and others yes.
Gabriel Brown
50%
50%
Gabriel Brown,
User Rank: Light Sabre
4/19/2018 | 8:40:46 AM
Re: Clarification
Good comment Stephane.
sli
50%
50%
sli,
User Rank: Light Beer
4/19/2018 | 5:06:38 AM
Clarification
Just to be clear, my point was that NFV is an obvious reality today as we already have production deployments. However as any new technology, it is not perfect as of today and some technical challenges have to be addressed (performance, power consumption) to get the full benefit. The good thing is that we already have identified solutions like the hardware acceleration or VNF rearchitecture to address those challenges in the future. Orange has demonstrated multiple times its strong engagement in SDN and NFV technologies with existing production deployments and our willingness to drive the industry to get the promise of SDN/NFV real.

Stephane Litkowski
newstar
50%
50%
newstar,
User Rank: Light Beer
4/18/2018 | 1:47:03 PM
SDN
technical events.
newstar
50%
50%
newstar,
User Rank: Light Beer
4/18/2018 | 1:38:37 PM
Re: hype or real
Maybe it is time to enter a new era.
newstar
50%
50%
newstar,
User Rank: Light Beer
4/18/2018 | 1:37:34 PM
SDN
Why do no new technology appear? SDN has been last for a long time.
angelsong
50%
50%
angelsong,
User Rank: Light Beer
4/18/2018 | 1:28:31 PM
as it is new
It should be right, it's an old concept, people just talk as it is new.
angelsong
50%
50%
angelsong,
User Rank: Light Beer
4/18/2018 | 1:26:10 PM
hype or real
SDN has been release for so many years, just hype?
amirz
50%
50%
amirz,
User Rank: Light Beer
4/18/2018 | 11:03:33 AM
Not my takeaway from the panel and conference
Well, as other people commented, I was there as well, moderated sessions and a panel, listened to lectures and spoke with other delegates.

Not my takeaway from the panel. This article might be a misunderstanding of Yaakov's and other panelists' sense of humor.

Are there challenges? YES

Is deployment pace satisfactory? NO

Was there consensus or claim made by a vendor or service provider that SDN or NFV are fads? NO

I would first differentiate between SDN and NFV, moreover, between SDN deployment in the data center vs. the service providers' networks.

NFV is bringing a promise of agility and CAPEX reduction (management/ truck rolls...) for the service provider giving them the opportunity to reduce services' adoption cost and cycle. NFV is also accelerated through SD-WAN deployments.

Those uCPEs running SD-WAN are afoot in the enterprise door for additional VNF based services. This is a real threat for the service provider, if introduced by the SD-WAN vendors and not by them so vendors & service providers "dropping their keyboards" on SDN & NFV work, will be left behind.

 

Amir Zmora

TheNewDialtone & SDnetIndex
komatineni
50%
50%
komatineni,
User Rank: Lightning
4/16/2018 | 8:09:59 PM
Perspective and expectation
IMHO

It all depends on what was the original expectation from SDN/NFV? If it was about changing the world, removing the hunger, solve all human problems, innovate new solutions and reduce capex/opex then it's busted.

If the expectation was to automate certain routine tasks, move over to COTS from a branded heavy ATCA/Custom based architecture & have some capitol efficiencies with flexible models - met half way.

Bottomline is it all depending on the business case and underlying needs/wants/challenges. In APAC, a majority of the TELCO's are not run by engineers but by accountants & Telco's need to adapt to strict regulatory requirements. When WhatsApp fails for an hour, there is no grilling by a gov or regulatory penalties. When a mobile fails for 10 min, the operator is liable for heavy penalties. Now, from risk mgmt perspective what makes more sense? Go with some tested solution or try to have a big 'programmer' team and explore DIY platforms for virtualizations? I dont think the market prefer the latter.
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Featured Video
From The Founder
Light Reading founder Steve Saunders talks with VMware's Shekar Ayyar, who explains why cloud architectures are becoming more distributed, what that means for workloads, and why telcos can still be significant cloud services players.
Flash Poll
Upcoming Live Events
May 14-16, 2018, Austin Convention Center
May 14, 2018, Brazos Hall, Austin, Texas
September 24-26, 2018, Westin Westminster, Denver
October 9, 2018, The Westin Times Square, New York
October 23, 2018, Georgia World Congress Centre, Atlanta, GA
November 7-8, 2018, London, United Kingdom
November 8, 2018, The Montcalm by Marble Arch, London
November 15, 2018, The Westin Times Square, New York
December 4-6, 2018, Lisbon, Portugal
All Upcoming Live Events
Hot Topics
I'm Back for the Future of Communications
Phil Harvey, US News Editor, 4/20/2018
Verizon: Lack of Interoperability, Consistency Slows Automation
Carol Wilson, Editor-at-large, 4/18/2018
AT&T Exec Dishes That He's Not So Hot on Rival-Partner Comcast
Mari Silbey, Senior Editor, Cable/Video, 4/19/2018
Facebook Hearings Were the TIP of the Data Iceberg
Dan Jones, Mobile Editor, 4/20/2018
Pay-for-Play Is a Sticking Point in Congress
Mari Silbey, Senior Editor, Cable/Video, 4/18/2018
Live Digital Audio

A CSP's digital transformation involves so much more than technology. Crucial – and often most challenging – is the cultural transformation that goes along with it. As Sigma's Chief Technology Officer, Catherine Michel has extensive experience with technology as she leads the company's entire product portfolio and strategy. But she's also no stranger to merging technology and culture, having taken a company — Tribold — from inception to acquisition (by Sigma in 2013), and she continues to advise service providers on how to drive their own transformations. This impressive female leader and vocal advocate for other women in the industry will join Women in Comms for a live radio show to discuss all things digital transformation, including the cultural transformation that goes along with it.

Like Us on Facebook
Twitter Feed