& cplSiteName &

21st Century Networking? Welcome to the Lock-In

Steve Saunders
2/20/2018
100%
0%

Industry pundits are fond of saying that the communications market is in the middle of "unprecedented" innovation. Not true. We've actually seen this level of creativity before -- way back in the 1970s.

That was the era when developments in microprocessors set off a huge explosion in computing.

And yet it was also when success was constrained by the proprietary nature of the technology. As the customer, you bought your computer from IBM, DEC, Wang (heh), Honeywell or whoever, and you used the code (today we call them "applications") that the manufacturer sold with their massive computer box thingy.

It was the first and biggest technology "user lock-in" that the computer tech industry had seen. And customers paid the price -- figuratively and literally.

Today, it looks like we're heading back to that proprietary environment. And the effect on end users -- enterprises and service providers -- will be the same: Paying more money for less choice.


Want to learn more about 21st Century networking? Join me at Light Reading’s Automation Everywhere on April 4 in Dallas. We will be tackling the business and technology challenges behind driving network automation. The event is free for communications service providers -- register today!


Why is this happening?

Back in the 1970s the proprietary nature of computing triggered a visceral reaction in the adjacent world of communications, as standards bodies such as the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) and Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. (IEEE) took a stand to make sure that technologies that were vital to the growth of the global economy couldn't be co-opted by a single vendor.

Vendors took these standards seriously, for very good reason, knowing that if they didn't comply they'd be left on the outside of a free market technology economy/ecosystem comprising a bunch of standards-compliant competitors.

But then, somewhere in the first decade of the 21st century, our industry forgot about the importance of standards.

Oops.

Partly this was because of the undeniable appeal of "open source." It's not hard to see why, with so many instances of open source code being successfully deployed in telcos around the world, our industry thought the same approach could work when virtualization became the "next big thing."

In the case of SDN virtualization, to a certain extent it has. But with the exponentially more complicated world of network functions virtualization (NFV), it has been a disaster.

In fact, in my view, far from being "open," the work on NFV has turned out to be both proprietary -- nothing more than a giant production line of poorly thought-out and utterly incompatible code -- and massively political (think Brussels bureaucracy, but for computers).

The result is that, as an industry, we've spent the past five years making an utter balls-up of determining the new software-based infrastructure that will form the underlying foundation for all applications and services in the future.

Instead of a clearly defined network layer, we now have a jumble of incompatible approaches to NFV, none of which work together without a huge lift involving lots of expensive lab work. Indeed, more than five years after NFV first became a "thing" in telecoms, Heavy Reading surveys of the world's major operators show that interoperability and the integration of virtualization technology with legacy technology is still the biggest barrier to successful NFV implementation.

Network operators will struggle to find a 'Get out of lock-in free!' card once they're trapped behind vendor bars.
Network operators will struggle to find a 'Get out of lock-in free!' card once they're trapped behind vendor bars.

Ironically, recent industry efforts to demonstrate NFV interoperability have actually shown how hard it still is to get virtualization products from different vendors to work together. Participants at ETSI's most recent NFV Plugfest event in January this year say the only way to get products from 24 of the 25 participants to "talk" to each other was by manually hard-coding the buggers -- a process that does little more than allow vendors to feel a bit better about themselves and be able to claim some sort of interop success.

(Note: The one exception to this manually-intensive exercise at the Plugfest was EnterpriseWeb, a company that has developed middleware that provides interconnectivity between different products without the need for hard coding and which, according to testimony seen by Light Reading, delivered on its promises. Disclosure: I am an advisor to EnterpriseWeb.)

This is not how technology in the 21st century is supposed to work!

No simple, plug-and-play interoperability = No falling prices = No free-market-technology-economy-soup for you!

This doesn't mean we don't have innovation galore in the industry right now. The cost of entry for companies that want to code new and exciting applications and services is, as the US President is want to say, a small loan of a million dollars. That's literally all it costs to put together the software engineering team and servers that are required. What it does mean is that the software they produce won't work over the networks for which it's designed without a ridiculous amount of trial and error. And expense.

My suspicion is that a lot of the incumbent vendors aren't so unhappy about how things have played out. If you're a company caught in the crosshairs of a rapidly shifting and increasingly unpredictable market, such as Ericsson or Nokia, for example, and the comms market isn't delivering the revenues you thought it would, the idea of jumping into a time warp -- Weeeee!!! -- back to a world where you can charge more and the customer has fewer options probably sounds, well, brilliant!

But I'll tell you who isn't thinking like that, though -- the Chinese. When the New IP Agency (NIA), a not-for-profit organization that I help run, recently announced the industry's first and only independent, open, NFV interoperability certification, designed to clear up the current miasma, Huawei and ZTE were the ones that signed up to be certified first. (See NIA to Tackle NFV's Ball & Chain: Interoperability.)

These companies understand that having virtualization technology that is proven to work with code from third parties -- yes, even from their competitors -- and then have the results and methodologies made public so they can be accessed and referenced, is the only way to assuage the concerns of service providers and light a fire under the virtualization market.

And if vendors in the rest of the world don't follow the example of the Chinese -- and soon -- we are going to end up with a situation where the Chinese beat them at a game that the West invented (successful, interoperable, standards-based technology).

Last week I was visiting an enterprise organization in North America that is deploying one of the most advanced networks in the world -- a software-based, virtualized architecture with analytics and automation capabilities. The. Whole. Nine. Yards.

I asked them if they weren't worried about the fact that today's next-gen applications aren't readily interoperable with the virtualization infrastructure from third-party suppliers. "Oh no," came the answer. "We're a Cisco shop."

From that statement, it's just a short hop to "no one ever got fired for buying IBM."

And then getting fired for buying IBM.

— Steve Saunders, Founder, Light Reading

(4)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Light Sabre
2/25/2018 | 10:22:50 PM
lock-in
"our industry forgot about the importance of standards."

I suspect that this is less the case compared to the notion that too much emphasis was placed on standards such that the over-hyped importance began to get ignored -- because of so many competing standards. Nowadays, standards bodies are treated more like their own businesses. They more resemble partner vendors more than they are like traditional industry standards.

Or, put another way, every business is for profit.
aleforcina
50%
50%
aleforcina,
User Rank: Light Beer
2/21/2018 | 12:42:43 PM
The value of Standards
Dear Steve,

you are 100% right. I "played" a lot in the old standard world (ITU/ETSI) with different responsiblities and roles. 

That world was not at all perfect and derserved a deep renovation, but today there is NOTHING.

We are moving from the old hw-based vendor lock-in to the new sw-based vendor lock-in

Regards, Alex

 
brooks7
50%
50%
brooks7,
User Rank: Light Sabre
2/21/2018 | 11:29:15 AM
Re: Safety lock
Dennis,

Open Source projects die as well.  There are many completely dead ones out there including many where technology stabilized for 5+ years and people abandoned the project.  Then you have new projects that you have to adapt to.  So just being in Open Source does not guarantee continuity of supply.

What I think is actually desired is to specify a number of components that have the exact same interface and behavior.  Then have these provided by multiple sources for free.  I just don't see how that works for vendors.

seven

 
mendyk
100%
0%
mendyk,
User Rank: Light Sabre
2/20/2018 | 3:00:02 PM
Safety lock
I wonder how important the idea of open systems is to network operators. Given the choice. maybe operators would prefer to do business with a vendor that isn't going to disappear at some point rather than take on the responsibility for implementing open systems. At this point, though, there are very few reasonably sure bets regarding vendor survival. Which means operators may have no choice but to embrace the open.
More Blogs from From the Founder
John Chambers is still as passionate about business and innovation as he ever was at Cisco, finds Steve Saunders.
Light Reading founder Steve Saunders talks with VMware's Shekar Ayyar, who explains why cloud architectures are becoming more distributed, what that means for workloads, and why telcos can still be significant cloud services players.
Light Reading's recent Automation Everywhere conference provided invaluable guidance and insights for network operators figuring out their automation strategies.
Ngena's global 'network of networks' solves a problem that the telecom vendors promised us would never exist. That doesn't mean its new service isn't a really good idea.
Light Reading founder Steve Saunders recently visited the University of North Carolina Charlotte (UNCC) where Cisco's Tetration application is providing data center analytics, simplifying SDN, helping with cloud migration and overseeing white-list security policy.
Featured Video
From The Founder
John Chambers is still as passionate about business and innovation as he ever was at Cisco, finds Steve Saunders.
Flash Poll
Upcoming Live Events
September 12, 2018, Los Angeles, CA
September 24-26, 2018, Westin Westminster, Denver
October 9, 2018, The Westin Times Square, New York
October 23, 2018, Georgia World Congress Centre, Atlanta, GA
November 6, 2018, London, United Kingdom
November 7-8, 2018, London, United Kingdom
November 8, 2018, The Montcalm by Marble Arch, London
November 15, 2018, The Westin Times Square, New York
December 4-6, 2018, Lisbon, Portugal
All Upcoming Live Events
Hot Topics
Telecom Jargonosaurus Part 1: Repeat Offenders
Iain Morris, News Editor, 7/13/2018
AT&T's Stankey Serves Up a Stinker at HBO
Iain Morris, News Editor, 7/10/2018
Broadcom Buys CA – Huh?
Mitch Wagner, Executive Editor, Light Reading, 7/11/2018
Verizon Taps Malady as Acting CTO
Dan Jones, Mobile Editor, 7/12/2018
FCC's Rosenworcel: US 'Falling Behind' on 5G
Iain Morris, News Editor, 7/13/2018
Live Digital Audio

A CSP's digital transformation involves so much more than technology. Crucial – and often most challenging – is the cultural transformation that goes along with it. As Sigma's Chief Technology Officer, Catherine Michel has extensive experience with technology as she leads the company's entire product portfolio and strategy. But she's also no stranger to merging technology and culture, having taken a company — Tribold — from inception to acquisition (by Sigma in 2013), and she continues to advise service providers on how to drive their own transformations. This impressive female leader and vocal advocate for other women in the industry will join Women in Comms for a live radio show to discuss all things digital transformation, including the cultural transformation that goes along with it.

Like Us on Facebook
Twitter Feed