"The 3G MicroCell complements Wi-Fi by providing enhanced in-home voice coverage and reliable data when Wi-Fi may not be available -- but it is primarily intended for voice calls," said the AT&T spokeswoman in an email to Light Reading Mobile.
For consumers, the femto price model means that they will pay AT&T for the Microcell to get better indoor 3G coverage, pay for the backhaul connection to AT&T's core network, and pay AT&T to use that indoor 3G base station.
AT&T's femto pricing hasn't changed -- usage always came out of subscribers' plans -- and its attraction to WiFi access is clear.
Dean Bubley at Disruptive Analysis has an interesting take on this and suggests that it looks as though AT&T's tiered price policy is disconnected from its femto project. Check out his blog here:
Is this actually a billing systems issue? Can AT&T's billing systems distinguish femto traffic from macro traffic so that it can give preferential billing to the femtos if it wanted to?
Isn't AT&T missing a trick with their femto pricing -- wouldn't it be beneficial to AT&T to encourage users to use their Microcell at home?
klaus, User Rank: Light Beer 12/5/2012 | 4:31:57 PM
re: AT&T Enforces Data Cap on Femtos
It's a lot like back in the day when online banking was just starting off: It actually cost more to pay online than it did to mail a check. Or driving on a tollway: It cost more to own a tolltag than pay in cash.
Until the banks and tollway people figured out that, wait, since we are saving our resources and it costs us less, maybe we should ENCOURAGE our customers to use the new stuff.
AT&T will figure this out too. It is in their interest to move traffic off of their cell towers and on to femtocells. It doesn't make a lick of sense that there is no cost benefit to the customers.
mel99, User Rank: Light Beer 12/5/2012 | 4:31:53 PM
re: AT&T Enforces Data Cap on Femtos
... and why aren't they sharing ? :)
I am a company forced AT&T wireless service user for the past 2 years and where my residence is (and not so coincidentally where I need my cell phone the most) I am in a total signal black hole as far as AT&T's signal goes. Sometimes, my Blackberry graces me with 1 bar out 6, most of the time I am in SOS mode.
Last month, when my corporation's wireless cell account manager mentioned this microcell to me, I was hoping that, it would be something to put it up in the attic or some place where there still is some signal reception and it will act as a repeater of that signal, just more strongly. After seeing this article, I thought something was off, regarding that idea of mine and I dug into it a little and saw that it is a broadband internet bandwidth stealing snivel, nothing more. Even though it is offloading the wireless traffic from their precious network and hop it onto the VoIP traffic, I am still subjected to limitations imposed by the cell phone signal. Are they crazy or what ? I am going to pay for my broadband thru the nose, and then deliver it to AT&T's disposal to pay them more money. Does not make any sense at all. I think I am jumping ship to Verizon soon. Screw the greedy basturds at AT&T...
PeteC, User Rank: Light Beer 12/5/2012 | 4:31:47 PM
re: AT&T Enforces Data Cap on Femtos
Currently the difference between AT&T and Vodafone plans is that if you have a smart phone on contract you typically only pay an extra £5 (approx $7.50) per month for unlimited data on top of your voice plan (I pay £30 instead of £25), so although there is no special dispensation for the Vodafone Sure Signal femtocell, no one really cares. I agree with the view that in the case of AT&T this is far more likely to be incompetence / being uncoordinated that a deliberate policy, and this may also reflect the fact that AT&T is sending all data from their femtocells back to the core network rather than offloading data traffic at the femtocell.
Light Reading founder Steve Saunders talks with VMware's Shekar Ayyar, who explains why cloud architectures are becoming more distributed, what that means for workloads, and why telcos can still be significant cloud services players.
A CSP's digital transformation involves so much more than technology. Crucial – and often most challenging – is the cultural transformation that goes along with it. As Sigma's Chief Technology Officer, Catherine Michel has extensive experience with technology as she leads the company's entire product portfolio and strategy. But she's also no stranger to merging technology and culture, having taken a company — Tribold — from inception to acquisition (by Sigma in 2013), and she continues to advise service providers on how to drive their own transformations. This impressive female leader and vocal advocate for other women in the industry will join Women in Comms for a live radio show to discuss all things digital transformation, including the cultural transformation that goes along with it.
To save this item to your list of favorite Light Reading content so you can find it later in your Profile page, click the "Save It" button next to the item.
If you found this interesting or useful, please use the links to the services below to share it with other readers. You will need a free account with each service to share an item via that service.
(8) | 
Digg
Del.icio.us
Reddit
Tweet This