& cplSiteName &

Cerf Weighs In on AT&T-vs.-UUNet

Light Reading
News Analysis
Light Reading
8/29/2002
50%
50%

The war of words and research building between WorldCom Inc. (OTC: WCOEQ) and AT&T Corp. (NYSE: T) just got hotter.

It started when WorldCom filed for bankruptcy last month, launching AT&T into the catbird's seat while president and CEO-designate David Dorman jawed away about his beleaguered competitor (see AT&T's Dorman Weighs In on WorldCom). Since then, it seems AT&T hasn’t passed up a single opportunity to tell the world that it's ready to take over should WorldCom's UUNet subsidiary go dark (see Whither WorldCom's Network? and AT&T Moves In for the Kill).

Contrary to reports that UUNet carries between 30 and 50 percent of all Internet traffic, AT&T has said that both it and WorldCom carry approximately 13 percent of all traffic each, and that migrating a large chunk of stranded UUNet customers to its network would be no problem at all -- in fact, it would be a pleasure.

Now WorldCom's talking back. In an interview with Light Reading Thursday, Vinton Cerf, WorldCom’s senior vice president of Internet architecture and technology, spoke out about AT&T’s claims.

“They’re suffering from network envy and wishful thinking,” Cerf said. “I think AT&T has a real problem.”

The RHK Inc. data AT&T used to support its network claims is dubious, Cerf says, since no one really knows how much traffic any one network carries (see RHK: Internet Growth OK).

WorldCom, for instance, collects data on how much peak capacity its customers’ networks are utilizing, he says. But that doesn’t translate into actual traffic numbers. “The data are not necessarily commensurate,” he says. “I don’t think it’s accurate.... I don’t see how they could come to the conclusion that we carry [13 percent] each. There’s no data to support that.”

"It's very hard to get traffic data," John Ryan, the chief analyst at RHK, acknowledges. "[But] we've worked long and hard to get it, and we got it." He says his firm used a number of different methods to obtain the numbers it published, including monitoring traffic on several large service provider networks. He wouldn't comment on whether or not RHK had access to monitor UUNet's numbers.

"If WorldCom is claiming that they have no way to measure their traffic... their network is not optimized," says Hossein Eslambolchi, CTO of AT&T and president of AT&T Labs. He says AT&T's traffic measurements are in line with the RHK numbers.

Cerf points to other studies, such as recent reports from TeleGeography Inc., Telcordia Technologies Inc., and Cooperative Association for Internet Data Analysis (CAIDA), that don’t talk about traffic numbers but do show that WorldCom connects to twice as many autonomous systems as AT&T, or that it has many more reachable IP addresses than do its competitors.

Eslambolchi says that WorldCom is missing the point. "Just because you're connected to more networks, doesn't mean anything," he says. "The fact is that we are tied with UUNet [on traffic], and that we have more broadband subscribers." Eslabolchi says that broadband users account for 14 times more traffic than narrowband users.

Regardless of how much traffic each network runs, Cerf says there’s no way AT&T could seamlessly integrate a large portion of UUNet’s customers if the unthinkable were to happen.

“The company suffers from what one could call hubris,” Cerf says. “My conclusion is that the AT&T guys are overreaching if they think they could absorb UUNet’s traffic. Moreover, the likelihood of them having to do that is close to zero.”

That’s because WorldCom has no intention of shutting down its UUNet network, Cerf maintains. “In fact, we’re doing better now than before we filed for Chapter 11,” he says, pointing out that the company is now exempt from paying interest on its debt payments. AT&T might be hoping UUNet folds, he says, “but it isn’t going to happen.”

Furthermore, he says, AT&T’s attempt to lure customers to change providers isn’t going to work. “In my experience, customers don’t move unless they have a reason,” he says. “It’s a big pain to switch service providers. This is the largest broadband network in the world,” he says. “Why would [customers] move?”

What could force a move would be a decline in the quality of service on the network, he says. But he insists that hasn’t happened to the UUNet network.

Up to now, AT&T's downplayed WorldCom’s importance in keeping the Internet up and running. Indeed, several AT&T staff members have been among those alleging that WorldCom executives pumped up Internet traffic growth numbers during the boom years and are at least partially responsible for blowing the Internet bubble that led to the current downturn (see Did WorldCom Puff Up the Internet Too?).

Cerf, predictably, disagrees. “Those numbers were a legitimate characterization of customer demand,” he insists. “If you don’t build the network out to meet anticipated demand, you’re doing everyone a disservice.” He says that the anticipated demand numbers didn’t lie, since during the boom years customers were asking for a lot of capacity.

“If a customer comes and asks for a DS3, your first reaction isn’t going to be, let’s take a look at your business plan to see if this is a good idea,” he says. But he acknowledges that "some people could confuse that for traffic statistics… That’s how some people interpreted it.”

Meanwhile, Cerf says WorldCom is determined not to let its competitors get too far ahead while it struggles through its bankruptcy proceedings.

He insists, for instance, that the company remains focused on developing its next-generation product line. “It’s fair to say that we’re not pouring a ton of money into [new service developments],” he says. “But we’re still continuing with R&D. When we emerge from Chapter 11… we don’t want to be offering two-year-old products.” Last week, WorldCom announced a new global managed firewall solution.

Cerf says he doesn’t know which specific services will drive the industry recovery everyone is waiting for. “Instead of asking what the next killer app will be, you should ask what’s the next killer app that will generate revenue,” he says.

Applications like email and instant messaging aren't going to cut it, he says. One area he thinks might be hot is the entertainment industry, where people seem willing to pay for emergent bandwidth-intensive services.

Cerf isn't expecting to see any signs of industry recovery, though, until the latter part of next year at the earliest.

— Eugénie Larson, Reporter, Light Reading
http://www.lightreading.com

(16)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
opticalfodder
50%
50%
opticalfodder,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/4/2012 | 9:51:01 PM
re: Cerf Weighs In on AT&T-vs.-UUNet
1. Disputed Numbers, but no counter-estimate offered. Nice Spin Move but, ....

2. What is the point in highlighting that UUNET is doing much better since it doesn't have to service debt anymore? Wouldn't a host of companies do a lot better if they didn't have to service debt?

Let UUNET go. Don't argue over traffic - argue over CUSTOMERS. (You two do remember what CUSTOMERS are, don't you? Annoying folks who pay the bills and demand service...)

Let AT&T and Sprint absorb the CUSTOMERS.

If they've got capacity - GREAT.

If they don't have extra capacity - EVEN BETTER. A little DEMAND in the system isn't a bad thing.

I'll bet AT&T and Sprint could craft a plan to minimize TOTAL switching costs for UUNET customers (If auto makers can go 0%, ...) .

Inefficient companies should be squeezed out by the market. Inefficient companies attempting to deceive the market? Throw them in Coliseum and send in the Lions.
puddnhead_wilson
50%
50%
puddnhead_wilson,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/4/2012 | 9:50:58 PM
re: Cerf Weighs In on AT&T-vs.-UUNet
I think anyone who has reasonably extensive knowledge of how IP, etc., works would immediately undertsnd why it would be impossible to come up with concrete numbers on how much of the total traffic load any one company's part of the network carries.
iptwister
50%
50%
iptwister,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/4/2012 | 9:50:54 PM
re: Cerf Weighs In on AT&T-vs.-UUNet
A previous comment was made that it anyone knowing about IP would know that it is impossible to determine certain traffic numbers.

I disagree.

A reasonable network will carry temporal measurements (usually 5 minute byte deltas) of each interface in the network.

These interfaces can be categorized into 3 (or more) categories:

* 1 * peering (off net / non customer)

* 2 * customer (off net / customer)

* 3 * backbone (inter-router)

It is true that it is difficult to quantify traffic on a flow-basis, but certainly not impossible. Probably impossible given today's actual configured deployment.

However, comparing the numbers for 1 and 2 do give a reasonable measure of traffic.

And therefore it is not impossible.

-ipt
TT
50%
50%
TT,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/4/2012 | 9:50:53 PM
re: Cerf Weighs In on AT&T-vs.-UUNet
GǣIn fact, weGre doing better now than before we filed for Chapter 11,Gǥ he says, pointing out that the company is now exempt from paying interest on its debt payments.

Thanks for highlighting the anti-competitive nature of bankruptcy. I'm glad you realize how it works - please now consider whether it's fair.

You're better than Worldcom, Mr. Cerf. Don't let Sidgemore and company drag you down with them.
skeptic
50%
50%
skeptic,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/4/2012 | 9:50:53 PM
re: Cerf Weighs In on AT&T-vs.-UUNet

Q. Who is the director of Network Traffic and
Revenue Analysis at RHK. And where did he
spend the previous couple of decades before
joining RHK.



puddnhead_wilson
50%
50%
puddnhead_wilson,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/4/2012 | 9:50:52 PM
re: Cerf Weighs In on AT&T-vs.-UUNet
Thanks for the comments on IP traffic, iptwister. Regarding measuring traffic: OK, I agree it might be possible to track raw byte throughput at each node, and use the aggregation of data to create an approximation of what share of traffic a network carries. But a raw byte count is inexact (packets might be better, but even then some message travel through more nodes than others, does that really signify "more traffic?"), and furthermore I don't know if anyone -- or, rather, everyone -- is actively collecting this information, let alone publishing it to allow carriers to compare their raw byte/packet load.

So let me revise my comment to say, IMO an APPROXIMATION of traffic share MAY be possible to compute, but there is no evidence all (or any) of the carriers are collecting this data, let along PUBLISHING it, which would have to be happening to allow AT&T to make this claim.
iptwister
50%
50%
iptwister,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/4/2012 | 9:50:48 PM
re: Cerf Weighs In on AT&T-vs.-UUNet
I am afraid that Mr Pudnhead and myself may actually have a civil conversation of intelligence. I fear that is not allowed on LR?

A few comments in reply, spoken with the most genial of voice:

"might be possible to track raw byte throughput"

- it absolutely is, and is done by every Internet ISP of which I know

"use the aggregation of data to create an approximation of what share of traffic "

- here is the intelligent dissonance, which is that a subset aggregation of traffic data absolutely will be (as) accurate (as the collection/storage methods) (!! should be).

However, the missing variable in the equation is indeed the denominator. These ISPs are loathe to publish their figures, so knowing what is the denominator is difficult. The EU has a fair amount of data from back in 1998, but that#s not so useful now is it?

Therefore, I agree that only an approximation of traffic share is possible without entire disclosure.

Now that said, one can get a fairly reasonable amount of discloser by looking at relative traffic levels with a bit of algebra.

Having done this a plethora of times in the past, any way you slice it, UUNET (AS701) is about 1.5 to 3X the nearest competitor in terms of traffic.

ATT is clumped together in a race for third place with Sprint, CWUSA, and a couple others.

As a final bit of information sharing, using packets as a metric for traffic is not very useful, the byte throughput is most important for various reasons which should be obvious to anyone familiar with the basics of IP.

So yes, I agree, noone knows the exact numbers, but everyone knows the approximate numbers.

And everyone knows ATT Marketing is lying just like they did when they said that if you plugged a non-standard phone into the PSTN the whole thing would collapse.

IPT
aa
50%
50%
aa,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/4/2012 | 9:50:44 PM
re: Cerf Weighs In on AT&T-vs.-UUNet
He may be a visionary and an accomplished person, but seems to have some problems.

1. Where was he when Worldcom was hyping data
traffic. Now when someone says that the
data traffic numbers were lower than reported
by Worldcom, he jumps and says its difficult
to measure traffic exactly!! Hello, where were
you when Worldcom was hyping those very
numbers?

2. He says its better now after bankruptcy!!
Who would not be better off by having
thier debt loads taken off thier backs?
I can start a business by borrowing a lot
of money and would have a nice time if
the debt could be removed!!

I think he can be above board and not be
dragged into the mud by his friends at Worldcon!
layer3
50%
50%
layer3,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/4/2012 | 9:50:41 PM
re: Cerf Weighs In on AT&T-vs.-UUNet
Who really cares ? The question Worldcom and AT&T are both avoiding is why neither can create and maintain a profitable business out of carrying data on their networks. Show me a profitable IP network, THEN I'll be impressed...

L3
broadbandboy
50%
50%
broadbandboy,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/4/2012 | 9:50:40 PM
re: Cerf Weighs In on AT&T-vs.-UUNet
I think AT&T should be a little more circumspect when they toot their own horn. Their IP backbone network experienced a 2-hour outage the other day in the Chicago area. Router misconfiguration was apparently the culprit.

Their claim to 5x9s reliability just went down the drain!

Anyone have any more details on what happened and why?

BBboy

Page 1 / 2   >   >>
From The Founder
The time has come for a telecom app store to save the industry.
Flash Poll
Live Streaming Video
Charting the CSP's Future
Six different communications service providers join to debate their visions of the future CSP, following a landmark presentation from AT&T on its massive virtualization efforts and a look back on where the telecom industry has been and where it's going from two industry veterans.
LRTV Documentaries
Service Provider Panel: Partnering in the Digital Era

5|22|17   |     |   (0) comments


Coopetition has always been part of telecom, but the ecosphere now includes data centers, vendors, apps developers, cloud service providers and Internet content providers. This BCE 2017 panel explores the new attitudes among network operators as to the value and variety of ...
LRTV Interviews
Site Demo: AT&T's IoT Flow Platform

5|19|17   |   04:25   |   (0) comments


At AT&T's R&D center in Tel Aviv, Israel, project leader Eyal Segev talks about the operator's Flow platform and how it helps to prototype IoT applications.
LRTV Documentaries
Agent of Change: A Q&A With AT&T's John Donovan

5|18|17   |     |   (0) comments


Carol Wilson talks with the man leading AT&T's transformation efforts about the challenge of change.
LRTV Documentaries
BCE Service Provider Panel: The New Business Realities

5|18|17   |     |   (0) comments


For virtualization to happen, the telecom industry first has to grapple with key functional aspects of SDN and NFV that need to be universal, such as onboarding of virtualized network functions and federation of software-defined networks.
LRTV Interviews
BCE Service Provider Keynote: CenturyLink

5|16|17   |   22:32   |   (0) comments


Aamir Hussain leads the Product Development and Technology organization at CenturyLink, which includes the company's information technology function. He is an experienced senior technology executive with more than 25 years of proven success in the implementation of global technology operations, operationalization of complex technology, infrastructures and business ...
LRTV Interviews
CenturyLink CTO on Transformation

5|16|17   |   7:43   |   (0) comments


The 50-year-old telco has already gone through several transformations, including every time it made an acquisition, but its purchase of Level 3 coupled with changes in technology and customer expectations necessitates its biggest transformation yet.
LRTV Documentaries
Light Reading Hall of Fame 2017

5|15|17   |   5:05   |   (1) comment


Find out who made it into Light Reading's Hall of Fame this year.
LRTV Interviews
Site Visit: AT&T's Tel Aviv R&D Center

5|15|17   |   09:58   |   (1) comment


Nir Shalom, general manager and VP of application development at AT&T Israel, talks about the key service developments undertaken at the AT&T R&D facility in Tel Aviv and how the team there has adopted new ways of working.
Telecom Innovators Video Showcase
Act on Your Intelligence With Amdocs aia!

5|15|17   |     |   (0) comments


Amdocs CMO Gary Miles explains how communications service providers can seize the AI opportunity with Amdocs real-time digital intelligence platform.
LRTV Interviews
Logtel CEO: Making Sense of IoT

5|15|17   |   09:48   |   (0) comments


Jacques Bensimon, founder and CEO of Tel Aviv-based training and consultancy Logtel, talks about the need to make IoT more than just a buzzword.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
The Challenges of Mobile Banking Implementation

5|12|17   |     |   (0) comments


Kamal Quadir of bKash Limited explains the challenges and needs of implementing mobile banking in the Bangladesh market.
LRTV Interviews
Tel Aviv: A Hub of Innovation

5|10|17   |   07:58   |   (0) comments


Light Reading's Ray Le Maistre and Dan Allen discuss the technology innovation, food and amazing sights they witnessed during a recent trip to Israel.
Upcoming Live Events
June 6, 2017, The Joule Hotel, Dallas, TX
October 18, 2017, Colorado Convention Center - Denver, CO
November 1, 2017, The Montcalm Marble Arch
All Upcoming Live Events
Infographics
With the mobile ecosystem becoming increasingly vulnerable to security threats, AdaptiveMobile has laid out some of the key considerations for the wireless community.
Hot Topics
BSS Is BS, Says KPN Tech Boss
Iain Morris, News Editor, 5/16/2017
AT&T's Donovan: Women Adapt Faster Than Men
Sarah Thomas, Director, Women in Comms, 5/18/2017
Verizon on M&A: Who Needs a Cableco?
Mari Silbey, Senior Editor, Cable/Video, 5/17/2017
Standardization Needs Room for Innovation
Mitch Wagner, Editor, Enterprise Cloud, 5/17/2017
Fright Wigs & Cocktails: BCE 2017 in Pics
Mitch Wagner, Editor, Enterprise Cloud, 5/19/2017
Like Us on Facebook
Twitter Feed
BETWEEN THE CEOs - Executive Interviews
One of the nice bits of my job (other than the teeny tiny salary, obviously) is that I get to pick and choose who I interview for this slot on the Light Reading home ...
TEOCO Founder and CEO Atul Jain talks to Light Reading Founder and CEO Steve Saunders about the challenges around cost control and service monetization in the mobile and IoT sectors.
Animals with Phones
What Brogrammers Look Like to the Rest of Us Click Here
Live Digital Audio

Playing it safe can only get you so far. Sometimes the biggest bets have the biggest payouts, and that is true in your career as well. For this radio show, Caroline Chan, general manager of the 5G Infrastructure Division of the Network Platform Group at Intel, will share her own personal story of how she successfully took big bets to build a successful career, as well as offer advice on how you can do the same. Well cover everything from how to overcome fear and manage risk, how to be prepared for where technology is going in the future and how to structure your career in a way to ensure you keep progressing. Chan, a seasoned telecom veteran and effective risk taker herself, will also leave plenty of time to answer all your questions live on the air.