& cplSiteName &

Alcatel-Lucent: Too Little, Too Late?

Ray Le Maistre
7/27/2012
50%
50%

Thursday July 26 2012 was a significant day for Alcatel-Lucent (NYSE: ALU). The company admitted that its efforts to become a profitable, stable company weren't working and that it needed to shrink its workforce by about 6 percent, get out of non-profitable managed services deals and find a new way to persuade the market, and itself, that the future will be brighter.



But is it going far enough? Clearly some think not.

Investors aren't convinced by the plans, as the vendor's share price is down, if only by a fraction of a cent, to €0.82 on the Paris exchange, where it has lost nearly 36 percent of its value in the past month alone.

The story is the same on the other side of the Atlantic, where the stock is down 3 cents to $1.00, giving Alcatel-Lucent a market value of US$2.34 billion.

Long-time telecom sector financial analyst Mike Genovese, a managing director at MKM Partners , believes the "significant job cuts and slight restructuring are probably not enough with €2.7 billion [$3.33 billion] in debt due from 2014-2017."

IP Equipment Spinoff?
So what else could AlcaLu do? In a research note, Genovese states that a spin-out of the IP (routers) division "could create value." Taking the market value of rival IP equipment vendor Juniper Networks Inc. (NYSE: JNPR) as a guide, Genovese notes that the IP equipment business, which is generating about €2 billion ($2.46 billion) in annual revenues, could be worth more by itself than the whole of its parent currently.

That assessment would place a zero, or even negative, value on the remainder of AlcaLu's operations at current market capitalization values.

In fact, Mark Sue at RBC Capital Markets has, in a research note issued Friday, cut the target price of AlcaLu's stock to $0.00 (honest!), stating that "we believe the company may see revenues contract, experience profits reductions and continue to burn cash from operations … the IP segment remains the only strong card in the Alcatel-Lucent portfolio," adds Sue.

As Light Reading noted Thursday, the IP division is the company's only real shining star currently. In addition, it has a highly respected leader in Basil Alwan and highly respected products. (See IP Remains Alcatel-Lucent's Star Performer.)

But what impact would a spin-out of that line of business have on the parent? It might end up being the company's only option, but what would that mean for the rest of the company? A slow and costly demise, very possibly.

Of course, AlcaLu's CEO Ben Verwaayen doesn't see things the same way. He is bullish about the company's ongoing prospects in China, where the current contract award hiatus is expected (by Verwaayen, at least) to be followed by a new wave of capital spending that will benefit AlcaLu. LTE, 100Gbit/s optical and cloud services management are also regarded as significant growth areas by the company's management.

What will be worrying for many, though, is that AlcaLu's current predicament looks similar, though not identical, to that of Nortel. If Verwaayen and his team can turn the AlcaLu ship around and prove analysts such as Mark Sue wrong, then it'll become a textbook case of a remarkable transformation.

If the management team doesn't achieve its goals, though, it might just become a textbook example of what can go wrong for large joint-venture companies in a fast-moving technology vertical.

— Ray Le Maistre, International Managing Editor, Light Reading

(14)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
digits
50%
50%
digits,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:25:58 PM
re: Alcatel-Lucent: Too Little, Too Late?


Is spinning out the IP division ALU's only hope?


And, if it did that, would it consign the rest of the company to the financial knacker's yard? 


I wonder how many highly-paid financial advisers are in Paris right now... and whether any of them are earning their fees?


I tyhink we might see the vultures starting to circle. 

DCITDave
50%
50%
DCITDave,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:25:57 PM
re: Alcatel-Lucent: Too Little, Too Late?


After spinning out the IP division, who's in favor of seeing ALU sell Bell Labs back to AT&T? Or Google? 

gtchavan
50%
50%
gtchavan,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:25:51 PM
re: Alcatel-Lucent: Too Little, Too Late?


Why raising prices is never a consideration in reorganization plans?  The only hope they have is to stop wrapping $100 bills to every box they sell.  They must raise prices to be profitable and it is a matter of survival.  All prices in all contracts have to be breached.   They might PO a few customers in the short run but what can they do, sue them and shut they down completely and get no hardware?  Besides, the Telco's need a minimum of 18 months to qualify a new source and at least 9 months on top of that to RFQ and short list all of the gazillion suppliers who bid.  Frankly if others find out ALU has raised prices, they won't be giving such low ball prices and the industry will come back to a health.  


 

^Eagle^
50%
50%
^Eagle^,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:25:49 PM
re: Alcatel-Lucent: Too Little, Too Late?


I wonder what the price for Bell Labs would be if they decided to sell it off separately.


of course a lot would depend on what patent portfolio would come with the labs.  considering the long deep patent pool with IP around nearly every part of modern communications, those patents from Bell Labs might be worth more than the entire company.  


Alternatively, they could sell access to patents and IP in chunks.  I'll bet I know some folks who would gladly buy several chunks of IP from the labs.


sailboat


 

Soupafly
50%
50%
Soupafly,
User Rank: Light Sabre
12/5/2012 | 5:25:45 PM
re: Alcatel-Lucent: Too Little, Too Late?


I recall suggesting just such a direction a few weeks ago, in a discussion with brookeseven.


Realistically, the IP division is the only product set that has strategic significance and tangible market credibility. When a carrier purchases IP platforms, its more than a box sale and that plays to some of ALU's strength.


Global competitors have copied & eaten ALU alive in optical, wireless & fixed networking. Those sectors are now viewed as "box sales" and commoditised. And thats perception is the single biggest reason why ALU are dead in the water.


You can add Nokia-Siemens alongside them, in the water.


The only other play, would be if a HP or Cisco were to make a move. If you could combine their core products into a suite of solutions that have real commercial value that could be their ace in the hole.


What those solutions would be, how they would sell them, etc, Is not something I would want to publish publicly, at this juncture. I wouldnt want to enable competitor counter-tactical using my posts and IPR.


Tbh, I doubt that HP. IBM or Cisco would make a move right now. It would be better to wait for Chapter 11, cherry pick the corpse without pension fund commitments, huge layoff payouts and other financial penalties that come from purchasing a "going concern"

OldVet
50%
50%
OldVet,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:25:38 PM
re: Alcatel-Lucent: Too Little, Too Late?


The CEO and CFO have been asleep at the wheel from the beginning.  As late as mid-May of this year, the CFO was on a road show to the former-Lucent HQ of Murray Hill, NJ and told everyone there that ALU was on target for a good 2Q.  This tells me that there are no live-look controlling/monitoring systems of the financials.  They have no idea on the financial performance of any project until the actual costs hit the system at the end of a project and they bounce those numbers against the revenue.  Their Supply Chain organization is bloated and inefficient.  The Sales force compensation is based solely on expected revenue instead of a mix between revenue and projected financial performance.  With that in mind, the entire sales force is no better than a herd of used car salesmen.


The so-called "merger" was nothing more than an old man's attempt at a legacy after his retirement.  Lucent brought zero value to the table.  It would have been better to cherry pick the good parts (few of them) and leave the rest.  One of the money pits that Alcatel took on was the significant represented workforce (i.e. union) that Lucent brought along with them.  Add to that the adoption, in toto, of ALL of the business processes and systems used by a failing company (Lucent) and the demise of a world-leading company is an ultimate certainty.


Each region in the company and each group within that region has adopted a defensive silo mentality since the beginning and it will only get worse until ALU folds up.  Most uf us give it til about 3 months before the debt payment comes due in 2014.

Boffin
50%
50%
Boffin,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:25:38 PM
re: Alcatel-Lucent: Too Little, Too Late?


One of the many issues that took Nortel down were the global pension liabilities. Does anyone know how much of an issue this is for ALU?

shygye75
50%
50%
shygye75,
User Rank: Light Sabre
12/5/2012 | 5:25:37 PM
re: Alcatel-Lucent: Too Little, Too Late?


Ray -- Doesn't the abandonment of managed services represent a huge long-term decision for ALU? I understand the short-term issues re profitability, but the managed services initiative was intended as part of the transition from hardware vendor to a more full-service supplier.

melao2
50%
50%
melao2,
User Rank: Light Sabre
12/5/2012 | 5:25:34 PM
re: Alcatel-Lucent: Too Little, Too Late?


mendyk, your post raises a question to me. Who is making a profit on Managed Services? 


Always I read, and read that service is the future, but managed services? Is that the future? As I understand managed services should be a low margin service. 


At least in here (Brazil), most of the companies are keeping its managed services operations to have foothold in the telecom operators. The profitability is just terrible. Additionally, for the consumer, the perception is that the service quality has degraded a lot on the last years, and I peronally think that the operators are not handling their operations completelly, and that caused the problem. Outsourcing is a bitch.


 


Maybe this is a limited point of view from the local market here in Brazil. Please correct me if I am wrong.


 

Soupafly
50%
50%
Soupafly,
User Rank: Light Sabre
12/5/2012 | 5:25:29 PM
re: Alcatel-Lucent: Too Little, Too Late?
Yep. In many ways Ericsson is rapidly scaling & expanding its Managed Services business.

It comes down to the same challenge, which persists across the industry.

Namely; What is your USP? If you deliver only "me-too" products & services then you deserve to go out of business.

Its a differentiate or die, world and you have to consistently keep adding value through people & processes.
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Featured Video
From The Founder
Light Reading is spending much of this year digging into the details of how automation technology will impact the comms market, but let's take a moment to also look at how automation is set to overturn the current world order by the middle of the century.
Flash Poll
Upcoming Live Events
November 1, 2017, The Royal Garden Hotel
November 1, 2017, The Montcalm Marble Arch
November 2, 2017, 8 Northumberland Avenue, London, UK
November 2, 2017, 8 Northumberland Avenue London
November 10, 2017, The Westin Times Square, New York, NY
November 16, 2017, ExCel Centre, London
November 30, 2017, The Westin Times Square
May 14-17, 2018, Austin Convention Center
All Upcoming Live Events
Infographics
With the mobile ecosystem becoming increasingly vulnerable to security threats, AdaptiveMobile has laid out some of the key considerations for the wireless community.
Hot Topics
Is US Lurching Back to Monopoly Status?
Carol Wilson, Editor-at-large, 10/16/2017
Pai's FCC Raises Alarms at Competitive Carriers
Carol Wilson, Editor-at-large, 10/16/2017
Muni Policies Stymie Edge Computing
Carol Wilson, Editor-at-large, 10/17/2017
'Brutal' Automation & the Looming Workforce Cull
Iain Morris, News Editor, 10/18/2017
The Big Cable DAA Update
Mari Silbey, Senior Editor, Cable/Video, 10/11/2017
Animals with Phones
Live Digital Audio

Understanding the full experience of women in technology requires starting at the collegiate level (or sooner) and studying the technologies women are involved with, company cultures they're part of and personal experiences of individuals.

During this WiC radio show, we will talk with Nicole Engelbert, the director of Research & Analysis for Ovum Technology and a 23-year telecom industry veteran, about her experiences and perspectives on women in tech. Engelbert covers infrastructure, applications and industries for Ovum, but she is also involved in the research firm's higher education team and has helped colleges and universities globally leverage technology as a strategy for improving recruitment, retention and graduation performance.

She will share her unique insight into the collegiate level, where women pursuing engineering and STEM-related degrees is dwindling. Engelbert will also reveal new, original Ovum research on the topics of artificial intelligence, the Internet of Things, security and augmented reality, as well as discuss what each of those technologies might mean for women in our field. As always, we'll also leave plenty of time to answer all your questions live on the air and chat board.

Like Us on Facebook
Twitter Feed