Light Reading
It's up to network operators to make sure "open" retains some meaning and doesn't go the way of "natural" foods.

Will Telecom's 'Open' Be Natural or Organic?

Carol Wilson
7/15/2014
50%
50%

I've been sharing thoughts on telecom's most recent fixation on "open" technology for several months, but I admit it isn't entirely clear to me how committed service providers and vendors are to changing their ways when it comes to moving off telecom-specific gear.

At our Big Telecom Event in June, I had a chance to talk with Neela Jacques, executive director of OpenDaylight , and get his opinion on this topic. Jacques was in Chicago for only a day or so. He had spent most of the previous month continent hopping in his role as head of the group creating an open approach to software-defined networking controllers.

He shared with me an analogy he has been generally sharing, so it may sound familiar, but it also struck me as quite apt. The two approaches to adopting "open" technology in telecom can be compared to two different approaches that developed over the last decade or more for selling healthier food. One approach involves products with the word "natural" on the label. The other involves products with "organic" on the label.

"Almost anyone can label their products 'natural,'" Jacques said. "But if you want to label your product 'organic,' you have to be willing to meet a specific set of guidelines that has been adopted by the USDA."

The difference is simple -- "natural" grew up in the commercial world and was used willy-nilly until it became meaningless. "Organic" was a term that food producers who were working without chemicals were willing to sit down and define, even though doing so meant compromising on what might have been the ideal standard, Jacques said.

It is then up to consumers to vote with their dollars on which products they are willing to buy -- pay less, and you likely get "natural" stuff that is not necessarily any healthier than the regular fare. Much of it comes loaded with chemicals. Pay more, and you get something that has earned the right to be called "organic" -- and you know exactly what you are getting for that price.

In the same way, "open" can become diluted if vendors use it as a label but don't adhere to truly open standards. There are many ways to avoid being truly open, even when it comes to application programming interfaces (APIs), one of the most common tools of the open realm, Jacques told me.

In some cases, vendors can open an API to the world but then change it, even subtly, without working with others on the change, calling it an improvement. A so-called open API can be published but remain entirely controlled by a single vendor. Or an API can be only partially open; it is essentially private, even if it is shared among developers that meet some approval criterion.

OpenDaylight is taking a truly open approach. Many companies contributed code to create its open-source controller, and that controller can now be embedded in any participating vendor's product. But any changes made to the code -- i.e., improvements -- must be shared and offered back to the entire OD community. (See OpenDaylight Unveils Open-Source SDN Controller.)

That's what gives vendors pause. A company that has what it perceives as a market advantage is loath to lose that by engaging in a collaborative process that requires sharing of its advantage, especially if they can look "open" by incorporating some elements of openness.

"We have right now a situation where companies are acting slightly open but screaming that they are very open," he said.

If service providers vote with their dollars -- as consumers can at the grocery store -- what they wind up with may look very natural but not very organic.

— Carol Wilson, Editor-at-Large, Light Reading

(10)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Carol Wilson
50%
50%
Carol Wilson,
User Rank: Blogger
7/16/2014 | 7:36:14 PM
Re: Verizon
Karl,

Certainly there has been more lip service paid to being "open" than real openess among the carriers - for many of the same reasons their vendors don't want to be truly open, because they see it messing up their business plans. 
Carol Wilson
50%
50%
Carol Wilson,
User Rank: Blogger
7/16/2014 | 7:33:22 PM
Re: Making the Business Case is More Important
brookseven,

Sorry for the delay in response, but you make an excellent point that is actually closer to what I should have said when I said operators vote with their money. They do, in fact, have to embrace a new way of working with suppliers that works to the advantage of both partners. I don't know that we've seen that yet. 

Food for thought, and another article. 
KBode
50%
50%
KBode,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/16/2014 | 6:51:08 PM
Verizon
Good food for thought, Carol. Verizon is the first to come to mind when it comes to empty rhetoric on this front -- the company breathlessly insisting they love open devices and networks since 2007 if not before, yet they're one of the worst carriers anywhere when it comes to actually letting consumers use the services and software of their choice. Whether it was their war on third party GPS apps or their more-recent attack on Google Wallet....

 

https://www.verizonwireless.com/news/2007/11/pr2007-11-27.html
TomNolle
50%
50%
TomNolle,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/15/2014 | 2:02:29 PM
Re: Making the Business Case is More Important
Certainly the potential is there, Mitch, but NFV's loftier goals also demand loftier thinking at the implementation level.  In the end, I think NFV could create "service models" that would frame SDN services beyond simple Etherhet and IP, though, and it's hard to see how that could happen without NFV.
brookseven
50%
50%
brookseven,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/15/2014 | 1:21:57 PM
Re: Making the Business Case is More Important
Hi Carol,

Open as opposed to proprietary.  Cisco CLI is proprietary and yet it is highly duplicated and reused.  There is plenty of Open Standards that go nowhere.

Standards become important when they are deployed broadly.  APIs the same.  Open Source the same.

I think the fundamental problem in Telecom is the time to adopt and change.  The IT domain absorbe new technology at a much higher rate.  On top of that, there is a massive number of customers.  This means that even if you don't land one, there are 100s or 1000s more that might.  In the telecom world, there are what 3 carriers in the telco side that matter.  If you add in wireless and cable, that number climbs to 12 maybe?  Globally maybe 50?

This means that the fundamental structure the telecom market has taken is really challenged to fund and execute change.  Let's just use the margin model.  In general, a supplier will NOT have a higher margin than their customers.  If they do, over time competition will come in and drive supplier margin down to at or below the customer margin.

Okay, how does this relate to the topic?  You have to make an assumption as a supplier that you have to relentlessly cut R&D expenses.  This is because you are going after a limited market against many competitors.  The only way you win is to spend less, since ALL markets will commoditize at the start (This is a really bad market structure to enter by the way)  You have to get the Operators to understand that this is the position they have created.  Open Source and Open Standards can help lower the cost of R&D.  So, I think efforts like OpenNFV or anything else need to be positioned to lower the oost of development, integration and deployment.  If they don't then essentially they become yet another burden.

seven

 
Mitch Wagner
50%
50%
Mitch Wagner,
User Rank: Lightning
7/15/2014 | 1:20:09 PM
Furthering the metaphor

You can take the metaphor further: In many cases, organic food is no healthier than factory-farmed. A fresh apple is a fresh apple. And organic growing doesn't scale to feed 7 billion hungry people. 

My point is that open is not automatically better just because it's open. 

On the danger of tricks vendors play with open standards: Microsoft in its prime was famous for "embrace and extend" -- take an open standard and add extensions to make it effectively proprietary. 

Mitch Wagner
50%
50%
Mitch Wagner,
User Rank: Lightning
7/15/2014 | 1:19:11 PM
Re: Making the Business Case is More Important
I think that's one reason NFV might be an easier sell than SDN. With NFV, the business value is more straightforward: Get products out to customers faster and with less hassle. 

With SDN, it's all about managing the network, something the CFO doesn't really care about. He's paying network managers to do that. 
TomNolle
50%
50%
TomNolle,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/15/2014 | 10:09:37 AM
Re: Making the Business Case is More Important
IMHO, software projects have to start with business goals, move to technology models, to architectures, and then to a component/object model set for implementation.  To me, it's clear that operators and enterprises both believe that next-gen networks will have to be justified based on agility and operations efficiency, so I'd start with those goals and then drill down to how to achieve them.  I think that use cases test this approach against real situations.  For the OPN specifically the challenge will be to avoid "implicit vendor lockin" that arises because the main supporters of these open-source communities are the vendors who want to lock you in!
Carol Wilson
50%
50%
Carol Wilson,
User Rank: Blogger
7/15/2014 | 9:52:52 AM
Re: Making the Business Case is More Important
Good point, Tom. What do you think the 'open' communities, like the new Open NFV effort, can do differently or better? Should they be developing the business case or new business models?
TomNolle
50%
50%
TomNolle,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/15/2014 | 9:07:43 AM
Making the Business Case is More Important
Operators tell me that the big problem with "open" approaches is that they're still bogged down in lower layers of technology and so they haven't yet addressed (and maybe never will address) the business case.  Vendors like Cisco have driven their SDN strategy from the top down, so they start with the business/application connection.  If you have to pick between an SDN story that you can get past the CFO but is less open, or a fully open one you'll never get approved, you make the only choice you can.
More Blogs from Rewired
But what took them so long?
There's a lot happening at the network's edge, and it's worth watching.
As promised earlier this month, Verizon is letting businesses turn up network and security services on a per-workload basis.
Cloud provider backs off M&A plans, but is that the last word?
The ONF is developing standards that will let you go to school on SDN and then test for certification to prove what you know.
Flash Poll
From The Founder
It's clear to me that the communications industry is divided into two types of people, and only one is living in the real world.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Saudi Airlines & Its ICT Transformation

11|24|14   |   2:07   |   (0) comments


In this video, Saudi Airlines discusses its network problems and how Huawei's Agile Network is its all-in-one solution.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Huawei's Agile Switch Benefiting Saudi Arabia's Yamamah Hospital

11|24|14   |   2:40   |   (0) comments


Saudi Arabia's Yamamah Hospital speaks about how Huawei's Agile Switch has improved the medical service's network infrastructure.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
FanPlay & Huawei Build a Wireless Agile Smart Stadium

11|24|14   |   2:13   |   (0) comments


FanPlay is a cloud-based white label service, which is effectively a football fan engagement platform underpinned by mobile payment technology.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Building an Agile Stadium

11|24|14   |   3:54   |   (0) comments


Stadiums may be thousands of tons of concrete and steel, but they now need to be agile. Being at the stadium may not be as alluring as it once was. Sports franchises and stadium operators discuss how to get fans back.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Huawei Helps ChinaCache Tackle Challenges in the Internet Industry

11|24|14   |   3:09   |   (0) comments


ChinaCache is China's largest content distribution network supplier. Huawei's CE12800 has provided ChinaCache with very strong support in its establishment of an infrastructure network.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Cefinity on Managed Security Services & Next-Generation Firewall

11|24|14   |   7:05   |   (0) comments


Cefinity is a cloud management service provider in Southeast Asia. Ivan Zhang, CEO of the company, discusses the implementation of security service management in the cloud era.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Huawei's Agile Gateway in the Eyes of Cefinity

11|24|14   |   2:11   |   (0) comments


Cefinity is a managed service provider for enterprise networks. The company currently uses Huawei's AR series routers for the most complete range of functions. CEO Ivan Zhang speaks about the advantages of the AR series routers.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
CTO of Bus-Online Talks About Huawei's Agile Gateway

11|24|14   |   2:53   |   (0) comments


Bus-Online covers around 100 million users everyday. In addition to providing mobile TV, and advertising services to the public, Bus-Online has also entered the field of mobile Internet.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Amsterdam ArenA as an Agile Campus

11|24|14   |   3:31   |   (0) comments


The Amsterdam ArenA, home of the Ajax soccer team, can be a crowded space. ArenA has partnered with Huawei to work on bringing ample bandwidth to 53,000 people at the same time.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Building a Gigabit Wireless Network

11|24|14   |   3:15   |   (0) comments


3W is dedicated to customer-centric services such as catering, incubator and PR. To do this requires a solid IT structure. In this video, 3W discusses how Huawei has helped to achieve its goals.
LRTV Interviews
The New Wave of IP + Optical Integration

11|21|14   |   04:29   |   (8) comments


At the Alcatel-Lucent Technology Symposium, Heavy Reading senior analyst Sterling Perrin talks about how SDN has reshaped the discussion around packet and optical integration.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Huawei Highlights at BBWF 2014

11|20|14   |   3:40   |   (1) comment


Broadband World Forum is one of the world's largest telecoms, media and technology events with over 7,800 senior executives from across the globe converging on Amsterdam every year to identify the Next Big Thing. BBWF is an exciting place to meet the entire industry under one roof and identify the latest in network innovation, service optimization and customer ...
Upcoming Live Events
December 2, 2014, New York City
December 3, 2014, New York City
December 8-10, 2014, Reykjavik, Iceland
February 12, 2015, Atlanta, GA
April 14, 2015, New York City, NY
May 6, 2015, McCormick Convention Center, Chicago, IL
May 13-14, 2015, The Westin Peachtree, Atlanta, GA
June 9-10, 2015, Chicago, IL
Infographics
Irish Telecom outlines the rise of VoIP technology, including its adoption within businesses and their perception of its quality.
Hot Topics
Bell Labs Chief Slams 'Toy' Networks
Robert Clark, 11/19/2014
$38.3M: Ain't That a Kik in the SMS
Sarah Reedy, Senior Editor, 11/20/2014
Do You Have a 2020 Vision?
Dennis Mendyk, Vice President of Research, Heavy Reading, 11/21/2014
The New Wave of IP + Optical Integration
Ray Le Maistre, Editor-in-chief, 11/21/2014
Google, AT&T, BT Unite on Network Data Models
Carol Wilson, Editor-at-large, 11/20/2014
Like Us on Facebook
Twitter Feed