Light Reading
Cogent's Dave Schaeffer says he doesn't like to fight, but he's not backing down from war with Verizon over Netflix traffic.

Cogent Gearing for Another Peering Battle

Carol Wilson
2/20/2014
50%
50%

Dave Schaeffer knows he has a reputation in the telecom industry as a fighter. The Cogent CEO is not one to back down.

He and his company have taken on some global giants: Deutsche Telekom AG (NYSE: DT), Level 3 Communications Inc. (Nasdaq: LVLT), AOL Inc. (NYSE: AOL), and several more, in a battle to maintain its status as an Internet service provider, worthy of swapping Internet traffic as peers without additional charges. (See The Great Peering War Rages Again.)

Schaeffer is now ready for Cogent Communications Group Inc. (Nasdaq: CCOI) to engage in this familiar battle with Verizon Communications Inc. (NYSE: VZ) on behalf of its customer, Netflix Inc. (Nasdaq: NFLX), which this week is talking about what it says is a 14% drop in delivery speed of its video services over Verizon's FiOS network.

The issue is whether Verizon is being reasonable in refusing to upgrade the quality of the peering connection it makes with Cogent -- the primary but not exclusive Internet backbone provider for Netflix -- unless it receives more money for the higher and very asymmetrical traffic load the video service generates.

Schaeffer insists he doesn't like to fight, but, in an interview with Light Reading, he doesn't hesitate to offer what he considers a strong case for Cogent and Netflix to get better delivery from Verizon. Here are the highlights:

On why Cogent gets into all of these Internet battles:
"We have had more peering disputes than anyone," Schaeffer admits. "But that is because we have only one business, the Internet. Everybody else has multiple tiers of influence -- voice, wavelength services, private line, or even their own content. We are very one-dimensional; we are all about the Internet. I don't like to fight, but we fought when others didn't care that much. And we have prevailed every time. "

On how the process works:
A Verizon FiOS customer requests a movie, generating a data message Schaeffer agrees is quite small in terms of bits. That message is directed to Cogent's network to reach Netflix, which responds by directing transmission of the video content from one of its 13 global server farms over Cogent's Internet backbone, an average of 2,400 network miles to a connection point with Verizon, probably at a carrier hotel or similar interconnection site. From there, Schaeffer says, it travels an average 300 network miles over Verizon's facilities to the end customer's device. So from Schaeffer's perspective, Cogent is carrying eight times the amount of "bit miles" of traffic to deliver Netflix videos than Verizon, and Verizon is being paid for its 300 miles of video delivery by the end customer.

On the asymmetric nature of the traffic exchange:
Schaeffer admits his company is handing off a much higher volume of traffic -- all the bits needed to deliver a movie -- than Verizon sends over its facilities. "The nature of the customer bases and the products the two different companies sell creates an inherent traffic imbalance," he admits.

That isn't true with all of Cogent's operations. Cogent connects with more than 5,000 other networks that pay Schaeffer and crew to carry their traffic and with 50 network peers, such as Verizon, in operating 81,000 fiber miles of network.

What Verizon could do to address this issue:
The reported Netflix data proves that the latency is occurring in the peering router, where congestion has reached the point that dropped packets now represent 7% to 8% of the overall traffic, Schaeffer says. That degrades not just Netflix traffic but all traffic traversing those congested areas.

Normally, when a peering point approves 50% to 60% congestion, the peers agree to upgrade their equipment at that point to handle the higher volume, and each company incurs the same expense to do that, he adds, with the companies alternating turns paying the cross-connect vendor, often someone like Equinix, to handle that part of the connection. Verizon is refusing to do that upgrade, Schaeffer says, without higher fees.

The Cogent CEO insists Verizon could make the whole problem disappear at very low cost: one-thousandth of a cent per customer.

On why peering is still the best Internet model:
Schaeffer is willing to wade into the technical weeds, unlike many of his fellow CEOs, and he says continuing to let big networks share traffic as peers, so that the Internet continues to be able to route traffic over the best available path, is what works for everyone, not just Cogent. He also argues that, unlike other networks that treat traffic like "hot potatoes" and pass it off to other networks as soon as possible, Cogent takes a "cold potato" approach and carries that traffic as far as possible for its customers. Thus, Cogent, on average, carries eight times the "bit miles" of Netflix traffic than Verizon does, because that is the business for which it is being paid.

On this battle:
Netflix and Cogent will take their fight anywhere necessary, including the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) , other federal regulators, and state attorneys general, Schaeffer says. He does expect the FCC to consider peering issues as part of the next round of open Internet rules and discussions that the agency this week said it will undertake.

— Carol Wilson, Editor-at-Large, Light Reading

(34)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Page 1 / 4   >   >>
joecook
50%
50%
joecook,
User Rank: Light Beer
2/24/2014 | 12:45:25 PM
Netflix Deal with Comcast
Looks like Netflix finally decided to pay for the bandwidth they are using so much for the position Cogent had.
MarkC73
50%
50%
MarkC73,
User Rank: Light Sabre
2/24/2014 | 11:31:25 AM
Re: NFLX postscript
I just saw the recap on CNBC which makes sense they get the scoops from their parent company.  Vz Deal is probably just around the corner, story also announced on CNBC.  This is a loss for Cogent.
mendyk
50%
50%
mendyk,
User Rank: Light Sabre
2/23/2014 | 4:32:29 AM
NFLX postscript
There's a report that NFLX and Comcast have reached some sort of peering agreement. This is the better way for NFLX to go -- through the front door.
mendyk
50%
50%
mendyk,
User Rank: Light Sabre
2/23/2014 | 3:23:06 AM
Re: Netflix should choose other suppliers
Cogent/Netflix and Aereo aren't about the same technology issues, but they are linked because in both cases, the real business issue boils down to unfair use of resources. In the Netflix case, operators know they have to be able to support the massive influx of OTT video traffic, no matter the source. But why should NFLX and its ISP get what amounts to a free ride on someone else's investment? With Aereo, retransmission of content without paying a fee (but in turn charging users for that retrans service) seems like outright piracy -- although there's more than an even chance that the Aereo case will pass legal scrutiny. We've seen more than a fair share of disruptive technologies and services in the past two decades, and much of that has been for the better. Business models that hinge on unfair use of resources are not disruptive in a positive sense.
joecook
50%
50%
joecook,
User Rank: Light Beer
2/22/2014 | 10:19:33 PM
Re: Netflix should choose other suppliers
You cannot look at this issue as just the interconnect point, the network is engineered and planned end to end, when the size of the itnerconnect is increased the planning engineer needs to understand where that traffic is going and make sure the whole IP network can handle the extra capacity.  This means everything, the metro ring, the Optical Long Haul Network, the large core IP routers etc.  Historically if you look at the Public IP bandwidth growth it has far outpaced the amount of revenue the carrriers can get in return for their investment.  The original internet was based on best effort and we have come a long way since then but the peering arrangements still require that the major carriers carry large amounts of traffic without any direct compensation.
brookseven
50%
50%
brookseven,
User Rank: Light Sabre
2/22/2014 | 5:07:13 PM
Re: Netflix should choose other suppliers
 

joe,

 

I have looked at the high water mark of the queue counters on the internal queues of FiOS Access systems.  The biggest number of items stored in any system at any time on any blade was 2.  That's right 2.

Have you ever actually looked at the queue measurement depth of an in use DSLAM or OLT?

The router network might - might have some congestion.  Of course, that is NOT the Access Network.

seven

 
joecook
50%
50%
joecook,
User Rank: Light Beer
2/22/2014 | 11:16:01 AM
Re: Netflix should choose other suppliers
There are some access network that run fully utilized it really depends on the metro area busy time of the day etc.  The issue here is really one of fair trade, peering is based on trading traffic, basically if I carry 1Gbs of your traffic then you should carry 1Gbs on my traffic not 1Kbs.  The IP backbone capacity and the ability to carry peak traffic load is what cost the big buck that the OTT players do not want to invest in.
mendyk
50%
50%
mendyk,
User Rank: Light Sabre
2/22/2014 | 5:24:33 AM
Re: Disengenuous
FakeM -- You seem to know this business better than I do. I'll stand by my semi-informed take that NFLX is taking advantage of outdated arrangements to make its business model work. It's not a situation that any network operator is happy about. Nobody likes freeloaders, especially ones that grab most of the vittles under a warped sense of entitlement.
brookseven
50%
50%
brookseven,
User Rank: Light Sabre
2/21/2014 | 5:49:43 PM
Re: Disengenuous
I don't see this as black and white for either side. I think saying Verizon is disingenuous about it is partially true. I also think we have traffic conditions and business models that were not envisioned even 5 years ago. I have a political principle that might apply here. This principle deals with the times when we have actual conflicting rights and it's called "The Principle of Maximum Unhappiness". In this idea if any party is happy then we are probably wrong and end to make sure all sides are somewhat unhappy with how the baby gets split. Making sure everyone is happy seems impossible. Making sure everyone is unhappy seems feasible. Seven
FakeMitchWagner
50%
50%
FakeMitchWagner,
User Rank: Lightning
2/21/2014 | 2:49:50 PM
Re: Disengenuous
mendyk -  Netflix support is not a goodwill issue for Verizon. It's a competitive advantage for them.

Or rather it's table stakes. If the carrier does not offer Netflix, customers will take their business elsewhere.
Page 1 / 4   >   >>
Flash Poll
LRTV Custom TV
Why SPs Should Consider Cisco's EPN

8|27|14   |   5:40   |   (0) comments


Sultan Dawood from Cisco discusses Cisco's EPN, which enables SPs to build agile and programmable networks delivering new network virtualized services using Cisco's Evolved Services Platform (ESP).
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Huawei’s Showcase @ Big Telecom Event 2014

8|26|14   |   2.56   |   (0) comments


SoftCOM is Huawei's framework for telecom business and network transformation. Haofei Liu, Solution Marketing Manager, Carrier Business Group, Huawei, showcases Huawei's SoftCOM architecture in this video.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Huawei @ BTE 2014: Director of Integrated Solutions on SoftCOM & NFV Monetization

8|26|14   |   4.43   |   (0) comments


Libin Dai, Director of Integrated Solutions, Carrier Business Group, discusses Huawei's SoftCOM and NFV monetization. Huawei believes that NFV monetization should be service-driven rather than network-driven, and that operators should have network transformation, service transformation and a compatible and collaborative ecosystem in place in order to deploy NFV.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Huawei @ BTE 2014: Director of US NFV Lab on CloudEdge & the Future of NFV

8|26|14   |   4.06   |   (0) comments


Sean Chen, Director of US NFV Lab at Huawei, discusses Huawei's new approach to NFV in open collaboration. Huawei believes that through Proof of Concept tests, it could help operators learn and communicate with the industry more effectively. Sean believes that successful implementation of NFV should have its values reaching to end users and discusses how Huawei's ...
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Huawei's Highlights @ Big Telecom Event 2014

8|26|14   |   3.34   |   (0) comments


At the Big Telecom Event in Chicago Huawei showcases its high-level strategy, the SoftCOM architecture, which helps operators reduce the cost of ownership of their network infrastructure and generate additional revenue in the ICT service environment. Huawei showcases over 30 pilot programs from across the globe, focusing on the industry-leading commercial ...
LRTV Custom TV
VeEX – Live from the Show

8|21|14   |   5:58   |   (0) comments


An overview of VeEX Test and Measurement solutions including TX300S multi-service test set with VeExpress cloud-based management system, UX400 universal modular platform supporting 100G testing, and the redesigned RXT modular platform.
LRTV Custom TV
Transitioning CE 2.0 Networks Into the SDN & NFV Era With Telco Systems

8|19|14   |   5:19   |   (0) comments


Telco Systems' Ariel Efrati (CEO) and Moshe Shimon (VP of Product Management) discuss virtualization and how the company's new Open Metro Edge solution utilizes the SDN and NFV concepts to accelerate and orchestrate service delivery through its innovative product portfolio and software applications.
LRTV Custom TV
NFV Myths: Is NFV Still Several Years Away?

8|11|14   |   1:13   |   (0) comments


Some say that NFV (network functions virtualization) is still several years away from being implemented on mobile operator networks. This isn't the case. Operators can get started on their paths to NFV now, as this short video from Skyfire shows.
LRTV Custom TV
A New Security Paradigm in SDN/NFV

7|28|14   |   02:54   |   (0) comments


Paul Shaneck, Global Director Network Solutions for Symantec, discusses the evolving virtualized network, explaining how Symantec is leading the security discussion as it relates to SDN and NFV, and helping to ensure the network is protected and compliant.
LRTV Documentaries
Sprint's Network Evolution

7|24|14   |   14:59   |   (0) comments


Sprint's Jay Bluhm gives a keynote speech at the Big Telecom Event (BTE) about Sprint's network and services evolution strategy, including Spark.
LRTV Documentaries
BTE Keynote: The Software-Defined Operator

7|24|14   |   18:43   |   (1) comment


Deutsche Telekom's Axel Clauberg explains the concept of the software-defined operator to the Big Telecom Event (BTE) crowd.
Light Reedy
Numbers Are In: LR's 2014 Salary Survey

7|24|14   |   1:25   |   (7) comments


Our fourth annual Salary Survey paints a picture of who's hiring, firing, earning, and yearning for a change in the telecom industry.
Upcoming Live Events!!
September 16, 2014, Santa Clara, CA
September 16, 2014, Santa Clara, CA
September 23, 2014, Denver, CO
October 29, 2014, New York City
November 6, 2014, Santa Clara
November 11, 2014, Atlanta, GA
December 9-10, 2014, Reykjavik, Iceland
June 9-10, 2015, Chicago, IL
Infographics
Hot Topics
Comcast Streams Back to School
Mari Silbey, Independent Technology Editor, 8/21/2014
Rogers, Shaw Take Aim at Netflix
Mari Silbey, Independent Technology Editor, 8/26/2014
Utilities to Pump $11.2B Into Smart Grid – Study
Jason Meyers, Senior Editor, Utility Communications/IoT, 8/26/2014
T-Mobile: Small Cells? We're Dense Already
Dan Jones, Mobile Editor, 8/22/2014
Verizon Launches QR Code Security Solution
Carol Wilson, Editor-at-large, 8/26/2014
Like Us on Facebook
Twitter Feed