Light Reading

Cogent Gearing for Another Peering Battle

Carol Wilson
2/20/2014
50%
50%

Dave Schaeffer knows he has a reputation in the telecom industry as a fighter. The Cogent CEO is not one to back down.

He and his company have taken on some global giants: Deutsche Telekom AG (NYSE: DT), Level 3 Communications Inc. (Nasdaq: LVLT), AOL Inc. (NYSE: AOL), and several more, in a battle to maintain its status as an Internet service provider, worthy of swapping Internet traffic as peers without additional charges. (See The Great Peering War Rages Again.)

Schaeffer is now ready for Cogent Communications Group Inc. (Nasdaq: CCOI) to engage in this familiar battle with Verizon Communications Inc. (NYSE: VZ) on behalf of its customer, Netflix Inc. (Nasdaq: NFLX), which this week is talking about what it says is a 14% drop in delivery speed of its video services over Verizon's FiOS network.

The issue is whether Verizon is being reasonable in refusing to upgrade the quality of the peering connection it makes with Cogent -- the primary but not exclusive Internet backbone provider for Netflix -- unless it receives more money for the higher and very asymmetrical traffic load the video service generates.

Schaeffer insists he doesn't like to fight, but, in an interview with Light Reading, he doesn't hesitate to offer what he considers a strong case for Cogent and Netflix to get better delivery from Verizon. Here are the highlights:

On why Cogent gets into all of these Internet battles:
"We have had more peering disputes than anyone," Schaeffer admits. "But that is because we have only one business, the Internet. Everybody else has multiple tiers of influence -- voice, wavelength services, private line, or even their own content. We are very one-dimensional; we are all about the Internet. I don't like to fight, but we fought when others didn't care that much. And we have prevailed every time. "

On how the process works:
A Verizon FiOS customer requests a movie, generating a data message Schaeffer agrees is quite small in terms of bits. That message is directed to Cogent's network to reach Netflix, which responds by directing transmission of the video content from one of its 13 global server farms over Cogent's Internet backbone, an average of 2,400 network miles to a connection point with Verizon, probably at a carrier hotel or similar interconnection site. From there, Schaeffer says, it travels an average 300 network miles over Verizon's facilities to the end customer's device. So from Schaeffer's perspective, Cogent is carrying eight times the amount of "bit miles" of traffic to deliver Netflix videos than Verizon, and Verizon is being paid for its 300 miles of video delivery by the end customer.

On the asymmetric nature of the traffic exchange:
Schaeffer admits his company is handing off a much higher volume of traffic -- all the bits needed to deliver a movie -- than Verizon sends over its facilities. "The nature of the customer bases and the products the two different companies sell creates an inherent traffic imbalance," he admits.

That isn't true with all of Cogent's operations. Cogent connects with more than 5,000 other networks that pay Schaeffer and crew to carry their traffic and with 50 network peers, such as Verizon, in operating 81,000 fiber miles of network.

What Verizon could do to address this issue:
The reported Netflix data proves that the latency is occurring in the peering router, where congestion has reached the point that dropped packets now represent 7% to 8% of the overall traffic, Schaeffer says. That degrades not just Netflix traffic but all traffic traversing those congested areas.

Normally, when a peering point approves 50% to 60% congestion, the peers agree to upgrade their equipment at that point to handle the higher volume, and each company incurs the same expense to do that, he adds, with the companies alternating turns paying the cross-connect vendor, often someone like Equinix, to handle that part of the connection. Verizon is refusing to do that upgrade, Schaeffer says, without higher fees.

The Cogent CEO insists Verizon could make the whole problem disappear at very low cost: one-thousandth of a cent per customer.

On why peering is still the best Internet model:
Schaeffer is willing to wade into the technical weeds, unlike many of his fellow CEOs, and he says continuing to let big networks share traffic as peers, so that the Internet continues to be able to route traffic over the best available path, is what works for everyone, not just Cogent. He also argues that, unlike other networks that treat traffic like "hot potatoes" and pass it off to other networks as soon as possible, Cogent takes a "cold potato" approach and carries that traffic as far as possible for its customers. Thus, Cogent, on average, carries eight times the "bit miles" of Netflix traffic than Verizon does, because that is the business for which it is being paid.

On this battle:
Netflix and Cogent will take their fight anywhere necessary, including the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) , other federal regulators, and state attorneys general, Schaeffer says. He does expect the FCC to consider peering issues as part of the next round of open Internet rules and discussions that the agency this week said it will undertake.

— Carol Wilson, Editor-at-Large, Light Reading

(34)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
Page 1 / 4   >   >>
joecook
50%
50%
joecook,
User Rank: Light Beer
2/24/2014 | 12:45:25 PM
Netflix Deal with Comcast
Looks like Netflix finally decided to pay for the bandwidth they are using so much for the position Cogent had.
MarkC73
50%
50%
MarkC73,
User Rank: Light Sabre
2/24/2014 | 11:31:25 AM
Re: NFLX postscript
I just saw the recap on CNBC which makes sense they get the scoops from their parent company.  Vz Deal is probably just around the corner, story also announced on CNBC.  This is a loss for Cogent.
mendyk
50%
50%
mendyk,
User Rank: Light Sabre
2/23/2014 | 4:32:29 AM
NFLX postscript
There's a report that NFLX and Comcast have reached some sort of peering agreement. This is the better way for NFLX to go -- through the front door.
mendyk
50%
50%
mendyk,
User Rank: Light Sabre
2/23/2014 | 3:23:06 AM
Re: Netflix should choose other suppliers
Cogent/Netflix and Aereo aren't about the same technology issues, but they are linked because in both cases, the real business issue boils down to unfair use of resources. In the Netflix case, operators know they have to be able to support the massive influx of OTT video traffic, no matter the source. But why should NFLX and its ISP get what amounts to a free ride on someone else's investment? With Aereo, retransmission of content without paying a fee (but in turn charging users for that retrans service) seems like outright piracy -- although there's more than an even chance that the Aereo case will pass legal scrutiny. We've seen more than a fair share of disruptive technologies and services in the past two decades, and much of that has been for the better. Business models that hinge on unfair use of resources are not disruptive in a positive sense.
joecook
50%
50%
joecook,
User Rank: Light Beer
2/22/2014 | 10:19:33 PM
Re: Netflix should choose other suppliers
You cannot look at this issue as just the interconnect point, the network is engineered and planned end to end, when the size of the itnerconnect is increased the planning engineer needs to understand where that traffic is going and make sure the whole IP network can handle the extra capacity.  This means everything, the metro ring, the Optical Long Haul Network, the large core IP routers etc.  Historically if you look at the Public IP bandwidth growth it has far outpaced the amount of revenue the carrriers can get in return for their investment.  The original internet was based on best effort and we have come a long way since then but the peering arrangements still require that the major carriers carry large amounts of traffic without any direct compensation.
brookseven
50%
50%
brookseven,
User Rank: Light Sabre
2/22/2014 | 5:07:13 PM
Re: Netflix should choose other suppliers
 

joe,

 

I have looked at the high water mark of the queue counters on the internal queues of FiOS Access systems.  The biggest number of items stored in any system at any time on any blade was 2.  That's right 2.

Have you ever actually looked at the queue measurement depth of an in use DSLAM or OLT?

The router network might - might have some congestion.  Of course, that is NOT the Access Network.

seven

 
joecook
50%
50%
joecook,
User Rank: Light Beer
2/22/2014 | 11:16:01 AM
Re: Netflix should choose other suppliers
There are some access network that run fully utilized it really depends on the metro area busy time of the day etc.  The issue here is really one of fair trade, peering is based on trading traffic, basically if I carry 1Gbs of your traffic then you should carry 1Gbs on my traffic not 1Kbs.  The IP backbone capacity and the ability to carry peak traffic load is what cost the big buck that the OTT players do not want to invest in.
mendyk
50%
50%
mendyk,
User Rank: Light Sabre
2/22/2014 | 5:24:33 AM
Re: Disengenuous
FakeM -- You seem to know this business better than I do. I'll stand by my semi-informed take that NFLX is taking advantage of outdated arrangements to make its business model work. It's not a situation that any network operator is happy about. Nobody likes freeloaders, especially ones that grab most of the vittles under a warped sense of entitlement.
brookseven
50%
50%
brookseven,
User Rank: Light Sabre
2/21/2014 | 5:49:43 PM
Re: Disengenuous
I don't see this as black and white for either side. I think saying Verizon is disingenuous about it is partially true. I also think we have traffic conditions and business models that were not envisioned even 5 years ago. I have a political principle that might apply here. This principle deals with the times when we have actual conflicting rights and it's called "The Principle of Maximum Unhappiness". In this idea if any party is happy then we are probably wrong and end to make sure all sides are somewhat unhappy with how the baby gets split. Making sure everyone is happy seems impossible. Making sure everyone is unhappy seems feasible. Seven
Mitch Wagner
50%
50%
Mitch Wagner,
User Rank: Lightning
2/21/2014 | 2:49:50 PM
Re: Disengenuous
mendyk -  Netflix support is not a goodwill issue for Verizon. It's a competitive advantage for them.

Or rather it's table stakes. If the carrier does not offer Netflix, customers will take their business elsewhere.
Page 1 / 4   >   >>
Flash Poll
From The Founder
Last week I dropped in on "Hotlanta," Georgia to moderate Light Reading's inaugural DroneComm conference – a unique colloquium investigating the potential for drone communications to disrupt the world's telecom ecosystem. As you will see, it was a day of exploration and epiphany...
Between the CEOs
Affirmed Networks CEO: Digging Into NFV

5|28|15   |   40:26   |   (2) comments


Hassan Ahmed, CEO of Affirmed Networks, is making some big claims for his NFV startup. I sat down with him at the Light Reading HQ in New York City to get the skinny on what this Acton, Mass.-based startup is up to.
LRTV Documentaries
Cable Eyeing SDN for Headend, Home Uses

5|26|15   |   05:57   |   (1) comment


CableLabs is looking at virtualizing CMTS and CCAP devices in the headend, as well as in-home devices, says CableLabs' Karthik Sundaresan.
LRTV Documentaries
Verizon's Emmons: SDN Key to Cost-Effective Scaling

5|22|15   |   03:53   |   (0) comments


For Verizon and other network operators to ramp up available bandwidth cost effectively, they need to move to SDN and agree on how to do that.
LRTV Documentaries
Lack of Universal SDN a Challenge

5|21|15   |   04:51   |   (3) comments


Heavy Reading Analyst Sterling Perrin talks about how uncertainty about SDN standards and approaches may be slowing deployment.
LRTV Custom TV
Steve Vogelsang Interview: Carrier SDN

5|20|15   |   05:02   |   (0) comments


Sterling Perrin speaks to Steve Vogelsang, Alcatel-Lucent CTO for IP Routing & Transport business, about the new Carrier SDN-enabling Network Services Platform and the operator challenges it solves.
LRTV Custom TV
Carrier SDN: On-Demand Networks for an On-Demand World

5|20|15   |   20:52   |   (0) comments


Steve Vogelsang, Alcatel-Lucent CTO for IP Routing & Transport business, talks about requirements and benefits of Carrier SDN during the keynote address at the Light Reading Carrier SDN event May 2015.
LRTV Documentaries
The Security Challenge of SDN

5|19|15   |   02:52   |   (0) comments


CenturyLink VP James Feger discusses concerns that virtualization could create new vulnerabilities unless network operators build in safeguards.
LRTV Custom TV
NFV Elasticity – Highly Available VNF Scale-Out Architectures for the Mobile Edge

5|18|15   |   5:50   |   (0) comments


Peter Marek and Paul Stevens from Advantech Networks and Communications Group talk about their NFV Elasticity initiative and the company's latest platforms for deploying virtual network functions at the edge of the network. Packetarium XL and the new Versatile Server Module: 'designed to reach parts of the network that other servers cannot reach.'
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Bay Area Spark Meetup 2015

5|14|15   |   3:54   |   (0) comments


Developed in 2009, Apache Spark is a powerful open source processing engine built around speed, ease of use and sophisticated analytics. This spring, Huawei hosted a meetup for Spark developers and data scientists in Santa Clara, California. Light Reading spoke with organizers and attendees about Huawei's code contributions and long-term commitment to Spark.
LRTV Custom TV
The Transport SDN Buzz

5|12|15   |   06:01   |   (1) comment


Sterling Perrin, senior analyst at Heavy Reading, speaks with Peter Ashwood-Smith of Huawei and Guru Parulkar of ON.Lab about the evolution of transport SDN and the integration of technologies.
LRTV Custom TV
Next-Generation CCAP: Cisco cBR-8 Evolved CCAP

5|5|15   |   04:49   |   (0) comments


John Chapman, Cisco's CTO of Cable Access Business Unit and Cisco Fellow, explained the innovation design of Cisco's cBR-8, the industry's first Evolved CCAP, including DOCSIS 3.1 design from ground-up, distributed CCAP with Remote PHY and path to virtualization. Cisco's cBR-8 Evolved CCAP is the platform that will last through the transitions.
LRTV Custom TV
Meeting the Demands of Bandwidth & Service Group Growth

5|1|15   |   5:35   |   (0) comments


Jorge Salinger, Comcast's Vice President of Access Architecture, explains how DOCSIS 3.1 and multi-service CCAP can meet the demands of the bandwidth and service group growth.
Upcoming Live Events
June 8, 2015, Chicago, IL
June 9, 2015, Chicago, IL
June 9-10, 2015, Chicago, IL
June 10, 2015, Chicago, IL
September 29-30, 2015, The Westin Grand Müchen, Munich, Germany
October 6, 2015, The Westin Peachtree Plaza, Atlanta, GA
October 6, 2015, Westin Peachtree Plaza, Atlanta, GA
All Upcoming Live Events
Infographics
Procera has gathered facts, stats and customer experience feedback from a survey of 540 users from across the globe.
Hot Topics
Bidding War for TWC Looks Likelier
Alan Breznick, Cable/Video Practice Leader, 5/22/2015
Charter Seals Deals for TWC, Bright House
Mari Silbey, Senior Editor, Cable/Video, 5/26/2015
Eurobites: Alcatel-Lucent Trials 400G in Czech Republic
Paul Rainford, Assistant Editor, Europe, 5/26/2015
Charter Plans Business Services, Wireless Push
Alan Breznick, Cable/Video Practice Leader, 5/27/2015
Will Carriers Follow Facebook's Networking Lead?
Mitch Wagner, West Coast Bureau Chief, Light Reading, 5/28/2015
Like Us on Facebook
Twitter Feed
BETWEEN THE CEOs - Executive Interviews
On May 29th 10 AM ET, Steve Saunders, founder and CEO of Light Reading, will be drilling into the "pains and gains" of NFV with Saar Gillai, SVP & GM for NFV at Hewlett-Packard Co. (NYSE: HPQ) (HP). He has defined a four-step NFV model describing a sequence of technology innovation. It's a must-read doc for any network architect looking to get to grips with their NFV migration strategy. Join us for the interview, and the chance to ask Saar your NFV questions directly!
Hassan Ahmed, CEO of Affirmed Networks, is making some big claims for his NFV startup. I sat down with him at the Light Reading HQ in New York City to get the skinny on what this Acton, Mass.-based startup is up to.
With 200 customers in 60 countries, Stockholm-based Net Insight has carved out a solid leadership position in one of the hottest vertical markets going in comms right now: helping service providers and broadcasters deliver video and other multimedia traffic over IP networks. How has Net Insight managed to achieve this success in the face of immense competition from the industry giants?
Cats with Phones