Omniverse One World Television is seeking intervention from a California district court as the company attempts to resolve a lawsuit filed by several major US studios alleging that the former provider of OTT-TV services violated copyright laws.
In an ex parte application filed Monday, August 19, Omniverse and its founder, Jason DeMeo, requested that the court "compel mediation" with the plaintiffs, noting that both sides have "exchanged several offers, but have reached an impasse to settle the case" in the weeks after Omniverse shut down operations of its TV streaming service.
Running point for the plaintiffs (which include Paramount Pictures, Columbia Pictures, Disney, Fox, Warner Bros. and Universal) is The Alliance for Creativity and Entertainment (ACE), a legal consortium representing several studios, media companies, programmers and OTT service providers.
In the case filed in February, ACE alleges that Omniverse distributed TV programming to various third-party reselling partners without obtaining the proper carriage rights. Omniverse argued that was on solid legal ground, citing a joint venture with HovSat, a private cable operator based in New Jersey that, Omniverse believed, possessed a 100-year contract with DirecTV affixed with "no limitations" with respect to US distribution and delivery method.
Omniverse has since attempted to put several light years' distance between itself and HovSat while also pinning the legal blame squarely on HovSat's back. In recent court filings, Omniverse argued that if there was any infringement it was done "without malice or bad intent" by Omniverse, and was instead "caused or contributed to by third-parties such as HovSat."
HovSat is believed to be owned by Shant Hovnanian, who is likewise believed to be in Armenia, according to court documents. Shant Hovnanian is also wanted by US law enforcement, as he was hit with a default judgement in July by a New Jersey court in a civil tax enforcement proceeding involving about $16 million in alleged penalties.
And now back to where things stand for Omniverse....
Fears of a criminal investigation
In the August 19 court filing, Omniverse claims that ACE is demanding that Omniverse and DeMeo "admit to what amounts to egregious conduct in exchange for a settlement" and that the plaintiffs "intend to use such a judgment as part of a criminal investigation against Defendants." Omniverse also claimed that it has attempted to resolve the impasse with a proposed mediation that has been "flatly refused" by ACE.
Omniverse said it's seeking the mediation "because there is literally nothing left for litigation," as Omniverse has shut down its streaming service and is now unwinding its business. "There is no conduct to enjoin because Defendants have stopped the alleged offending conduct by shutting down operations."
Not mentioned in the August 19 ex parte filed by Omniverse and DeMeo is that OmniShop Media, another company evidently headed up by DeMeo appears to be preparing the launch of a service in early September called OSTV Now that will offer more than 50 "top" US TV channels, premium channels, a mix of "faith based" channels and international channels, a DVR, and up to four simultaneous streams. OmniShop Media also proclaims to be a reseller of pay-TV services from Charter Communications and Dish Network. (Charter and Dish did not respond when asked earlier this month if either currently has a direct relationship with OmniShop Media. DeMeo also has not responded to questions about OSTV Now.)
Back at the court, Omniverse and DeMeo claim that they are being coerced to settle on ACE's terms by pummeling them with "voluminous discovery requests and issuing a deposition notice, all to drive up the costs of litigation."
"Defendants are left with no choice but to ask the Court to compel mediation so that this case can be settled quickly, efficiently, and economically without wasteful and unnecessary discovery," the ex parte continued. "Discovery is moot because Omniverse has ceased operations, and proceeding with further discovery and related motions is wasteful."
To spur this toward resolution, Omniverse said it made written settlement offers to the plaintiffs on May 31 and July 24, but claimed that ACE did not confirm if the offers were received by each plaintiff and if those plaintiffs responded to the settlement offers.
Regarding the request made Monday, Omniverse wants the court to temporarily stay discovery until mediation is completed.
Get up to speed on the Omniverse saga:
- OSTV Now: Omniverse Exec Offers One-Stop Shop for TV
- Omniverse to Shutter Operations, Cut Ties to HovSat
- Not Ready for Prime Time: Omniverse Distributors Pick Up the Pieces After Pay-TV Deals Fall Apart
- Omniverse Drops Live OTT-TV Service for 'Single-Dwelling' Residential Subs
- Omniverse Halts Marketing of OTT-TV Service for Single-Dwelling Customers
- The Beginning of the End of Omniverse?
- ACE, Omniverse Slug It Out as Court Date Looms
- Flixon Backs Away from Pay-TV
- Podcast: Sprint, T-Mobile Merger Madness, Ominous Signs for Omniverse
- Omniverse Lawsuit Scares Off Clikia
- Omniverse: Deal Between Hovsat & DirecTV Has 'No Limitations'
- A Service Called 'Omni Go' Quietly Replaces FlixonTV
- Silicon Dust to Snuff OTT-TV Service Linked to Omniverse
- ACE Slays the Dragon Box
- Podcast: Into the Omniverse
- Who 'Owns' Omniverse's OTT-TV Customers?
- Omniverse CEO: 'I'm Doing Everything Literally by the Book'
- Is Omniverse Sourcing Video Feeds From DirecTV?
- Big Programmers & Studios Bring Hammer Down on Omniverse
— Jeff Baumgartner, Senior Editor, Light Reading