& cplSiteName &

What WebRTC Means for Telcos

Sarah Thomas

The API advantage
Vendors like Genband Inc. are counting on this, as well. It recently introduced a gateway, SpiDR, that sits at the network edge to bridge the wireless network with the web. Greg Zweig, the company's director of solutions marketing, says it lets operators sell WebRTC connectivity as a service, just as they sold 800 numbers as a service. It just takes a simple API and a browser to replace the soft client. Operators can provide the connectivity, but they can also sell the URL or API to add the functionality to a site. (See Genband Builds a Gateway to WebRTC.)

"With WebRTC, you are giving people an experience and the ability to add services to that experience," Zweig says. "The service provider has a new avenue to reach that customer and expose new services."

Alcatel-Lucent (NYSE: ALU), too, is playing in the WebRTC space. It has its own developer program in which APIs are built directly into its products and open to developers. Ed Elkin, marketing director for advanced communication solutions at Alcatel-Lucent, says a big draw for enterprises to WebRTC has simply been the ability to make the tablet an extension of the mobile phone.

For example, Quobis, an AlcaLu customer, built an app using the vendor's IMS that integrates WebRTC into Salesforce, so that an enterprise employee can take a call from Salesforce.com on a phone or tablet or move it in between.

Elkin sees WebRTC as the perfect win-win(-win) for it, the network operators, and enterprises. Enterprises get dramatic cost reductions and a huge boost in productivity from the cloud and mobility aspects of the platform, and they can blend IT and community together, as Salesforce.com did. The service provider selling connectivity to the enterprise clearly benefits from the business, and AlcaLu can tap into an entirely new market.

"Everyone who loses is the old legacy customer premise vendors selling high-margin equipment that's very expensive," he says. "The enterprise saves money and gets more functionality. Service providers get a whole new line of business beyond traditional enterprise trunking, and we make good business doing this at the cost of the old CPE vendors."

But that is true only if operators act -- and sooner rather than later. WebRTC is a magnifier for carriers, as Bubley explains it. If they are already experimenting with over-the-top content and innovative services around video, they are likely ecstatic about the opportunity. If they are the type that's scared of Skype and SnapChat, it's only going to get a whole lot worse with WebRTC. His advice is to start experimenting, and not just from one part of the core network business, but several. See what sticks through trial by fire, much as Telefonica did with its digital division.

"This is one of those areas where there is the ability for individual groups to innovate," Bubley says. "That's ultimately going to drive success. It's a web technology. If it's treated like a web tech, that's good. If it's treated like a telecom tech, it will come with those disadvantages, as well."

— Sarah Reedy, Senior Editor, Light Reading

(4)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
User Rank: Light Beer
7/4/2014 | 9:12:49 AM
Re: wireless OR cable
Hi SReedy,


Yes you did miss one call "Pexip" http://www.pexip.com/.  I'm happy to provide insight if you find this platform intersting to write about.  We have the best most scalable and interoperable platform on the market.
User Rank: Light Beer
6/14/2014 | 6:55:58 PM
Re: wireless OR cable
In addition to our expert marketplace, LiveNinja now offers a B2B product called Katana which basically acts as a video call center in the cloud. Please check it out at http://katana.co/

We also have a demo video here of it in action: https://vimeo.com/96820461

Great post Sarah!

User Rank: Light Sabre
6/7/2014 | 1:54:20 PM
Re: wireless OR cable
I wonder what this is going to mean for Skype? One would think that on desktops and laptops, it would move to a web-based client. They might not have a choice: With WebRTC making Skype-like features easy on the web, it challenges this incumbent. 

There's something to be said about network effects, however. I use Skype to connect with others usig Skype. That's hard behavior to change quickly. 
User Rank: Light Beer
6/3/2014 | 3:57:04 AM
wireless OR cable
Did we miss any WebRTC examples, operator or otherwise? The Comcast X1 integration will be interesting next year. WebRTC is an opportunity for wireless operators with the network infrastructure in place, but theres clearly a play for cable companies as well. It's an easy way to give them a voice play.
Featured Video
Flash Poll
Upcoming Live Events
September 17-19, 2019, Dallas, Texas
October 1-2, 2019, New Orleans, Louisiana
October 10, 2019, New York, New York
October 22, 2019, Los Angeles, CA
November 5, 2019, London, England
November 7, 2019, London, UK
December 3, 2019, New York, New York
December 3-5, 2019, Vienna, Austria
March 16-18, 2020, Embassy Suites, Denver, Colorado
May 18-20, 2020, Irving Convention Center, Dallas, TX
All Upcoming Live Events