& cplSiteName &

Sprint + T-Mobile = Security Risk?

Ray Le Maistre
7/4/2018
50%
50%

A letter urging a US security review of the proposed Sprint/T-Mobile US merger is being circulated in Congress because Sprint's owner, Japan's SoftBank, has "ties" to Chinese vendor Huawei, according to a Bloomberg report. (See T-Mobile to Buy Sprint for $26.5B to Create US 5G Powerhouse.)

Ties? You mean, SoftBank Corp. , a major telecoms and technology company, has done business and is engaged in development work with the world's single largest supplier of communications networking technology? How shocking. (See Huawei Teams With SD-WAN Partners to Build an Intent-Driven Network, SoftBank & Huawei Demonstrate 5G Use Cases and Huawei Helps Carriers to Scale Up, Scale Out Before 5G .)

I mean, there are credible reasons to consider whether allowing Sprint Corp. (NYSE: S) and T-Mobile US Inc. to get married is a good idea, for sure. (See Is the Sprint & T-Mobile Merger Too Risky?, DOJ Examing How T-Mobile & Sprint Merger Would Affect Pre-Paid Pricing – Report and T-Mobile & Sprint: Marriage Made in Hell.)

But security risk? From a parent company because it has dealings with a supplier, albeit one that is pilloried for sometimes (though not always) questionable reasons?

How many degrees of separation from a Chinese firm would any company need before a politician didn't ask for a security review? The mind boggles.

In the meantime, here's Johnny!

— Ray Le Maistre, Editor-in-Chief, Light Reading

(6)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First        ADD A COMMENT
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/4/2018 | 4:51:26 PM
Antitrust and nat'l security are separate issues
If Sprint represents a security risk, why not deal with it previously independent of the merger?

Silliness.
Rhodes1
50%
50%
Rhodes1,
User Rank: Light Weight
7/5/2018 | 3:37:33 AM
Re: Antitrust and nat'l security are separate issues
It sounds like congress is the security risk if internal process gets leaked to the press. 

"A draft letter to Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin, who leads a U.S. national security review of the deal, is to be sent next week and is being circulated for signatures among lawmakers in the House by congressional critics of the deal, according to a copy obtained by Bloomberg News."

As a reminder about Congress technical competence, perhaps a firewall (or just a wall?) should be placed around Congress.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=stXgn2iZAAY 
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/5/2018 | 2:48:03 PM
Re: Antitrust and nat'l security are separate issues
@Rhodes: To be fair, hardly sounds like an especially sensitive document to be sent/leaked to the press -- especially in a town where press leaks are seemingly as common as rain.
Clifton K Morris
50%
50%
Clifton K Morris,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/5/2018 | 1:43:45 PM
A LITTLE FRINGE...
I considered this scenario, it seemed a little “fringe” to me. But yes, Angela Merkel, Chancellor of Germany, could possibly loose re-election, and thusly, the German Investment into the US could be used as a bargaining chip (for trade policy or issues). Being 60% owned by DT, and DT’s investment in the US occurred exclusively during Angela Merkel’s tenure as leader of Germany. It certainly can be a threat if political unrest in Europe continues. See: https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/982434/German-elections-angela-merkel-news-Germany-coalition-news-EU-migrant-deal
DanJones
50%
50%
DanJones,
User Rank: Blogger
7/5/2018 | 2:36:23 PM
Re: A LITTLE FRINGE...
President basically has control if he declares something a national security issue. Look at the proposed tariffs on European cars.
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/5/2018 | 2:50:12 PM
Re: A LITTLE FRINGE...
@Dan: Yep, pretty much. War powers and all. There are exceptions/limitations, of course. Congress can certainly help -- or hinder -- Presidential authority when it comes to this kind of thing. This was particularly at issue in the wake of the USA PATRIOT Act and the FISA warrants pursuant to the Congressional AUMF after 9/11.
More Blogs from Shades of Ray
Colt, Filament, Mobileum and Synchronoss Technologies all submitted standout entries for most innovative blockchain for telecoms strategy in this year's Leading Lights contest.
The big noise in Barcelona was, of course, anything and everything to do with 5G, but in the background there were signs that some companies are embracing the potential of the public cloud as they determine their next-generation technology and services strategies.
POTUS wants 5G and 6G ASAP!!
An 'executive order' banning Chinese networking technology from US communications networks is imminent, according to Politico – such a posturing move would be bad for everyone.
Why would a private equity company buy a telecom network assurance and optimization company? Because the cloud is where the money is.
Featured Video
Flash Poll
Upcoming Live Events
September 17-19, 2019, Dallas, Texas
October 1, 2019, New Orleans, Louisiana
October 2-22, 2019, Los Angeles, CA
October 10, 2019, New York, New York
November 5, 2019, London, England
November 7, 2019, London, UK
December 3-5, 2019, Vienna, Austria
December 3, 2019, New York, New York
All Upcoming Live Events
Partner Perspectives - content from our sponsors
Transform Beyond Borders to Lead the Innovation
By Ben Zhou, CEO, Whale Cloud
Reject Limits. Build the Future.
By David Wang, Huawei
China Telecom & Huawei Jointly Complete the World's First End-to-End 5G SA Voice & Video Call
By Jay Liu, Senior Marketing Manager, Cloud Core Product Line, Huawei Technologies
All Partner Perspectives