Broadband services

Virgin Media Boss Attacks BT/EE Deal

LONDON -- Broadband World Forum -- Virgin Media CEO Tom Mockridge has joined calls for BT and EE to be stripped of spectrum licenses following their £12.5 billion ($19.3 billion) merger but urged regulatory authorities not to mandate the structural separation of BT's Openreach infrastructure business.

Speaking at the Broadband World Forum in London earlier Tuesday, the boss of the UK cable operator said that BT Global Services and EE would control about two thirds of the best spectrum in the UK market following their tie-up.

"It would leave too much spectrum in the hands of one company and would not be a good outcome," he told attendees during a keynote presentation.

BT and EE are hoping to wrap up a merger early next year but have come under attack from rivals while they wait for regulatory authorities to approve their plans. (See BT Locks Down £12.5B EE Takeover Deal.)

Currently a joint venture between Germany's Deutsche Telekom AG (NYSE: DT) and France's Orange (NYSE: FTE), EE has been able to roll out higher-speed mobile broadband services than its rivals by taking advantage of its generous spectrum holdings, and a merger with BT -- which picked up 2.6GHz licenses during the UK's 4G auction -- would leave it in an even stronger position.

A part of John Malone's Liberty Global Inc. (Nasdaq: LBTY), which owns cable networks across Europe, Virgin Media Inc. (Nasdaq: VMED) provides mobile offerings through a wholesale arrangement with EE, and so measures to reduce EE's spectrum holdings could actually have an impact on the cable operator's own services.

In other European markets, Liberty Global has looked eager to wean itself off such MVNO arrangements and become a fully fledged mobile network operator. (See Telenet Buys KPN's BASE in $1.4B Deal.)

The company was recently involved in talks with Vodafone Group plc (NYSE: VOD) about an exchange of assets that could have allowed it to address its mobile network shortcoming in a number of countries, but the discussions ultimately proved fruitless. (See Vodafone, Liberty Call Off Asset-Swap Talks.)

For more fixed broadband market coverage and insights, check out our dedicated broadband content channel here on Light Reading.

While Mockridge has sided with Vodafone and other BT rivals on the spectrum issue, he opposes their view that BT should be carved up into separate retail and network companies to improve competition. (See BT Split Could Spur Vodafone to Invest in Fiber – Colao.)

"This is not something we agree with as an infrastructure investor," he said. "BT was privatized 30 years ago with that network and a choice was made then -- it is not reasonable to come back to this a second time."

Although Virgin Media's network is not subject to the same regulation as BT's, Mockridge is undoubtedly concerned that a carve-up of BT could lead to greater scrutiny of his own business, which would be the UK's biggest infrastructure player offering retail services if Openreach were spun off.

Currently available to about 13 million UK premises, Virgin Media's cable network is being extended to another 4 million as part of a £3 billion ($4.6 billion) investment program announced earlier this year. (See Virgin Media Plots £3B Invasion of BT Turf.)

Introduced last month, Virgin Media's highest-speed broadband service of 200 Mbit/s compares very favorably with BT's premium offer of 76 Mbit/s and Mockridge revealed at the Broadband World Forum that his company will launch a 300Mbit/s service for small business customers early next year.

But he complained about other aspects of the current regulatory set-up, pointing out that fixed-line infrastructure rivals to BT lack the same ease of access to premises as infrastructure suppliers in the energy sector.

"We have to go to landlords and buy wayleave entitlement to put broadband into apartments and houses," he said. "It needs to be more pragmatic for newcomers to gain entry to premises -- something that BT enjoys because it owns the copper networks put in by the taxpayer a century ago."

Virgin Media currently claims to serve 5.5 million cable customers and 3 million mobile subscribers, including 4.9 million broadband users, 4.1 million TV users and 1 million quad-play users subscribing to packages of fixed voice, broadband, TV and mobile services.

— Iain Morris, Circle me on Google+ Follow me on TwitterVisit my LinkedIn profile, News Editor, Light Reading

COMMENTS Add Comment
SNSVoice64353 10/21/2015 | 5:27:18 AM
Re: Seems like a real bad idea I'm not quite sure where you are coming from with this post. Nowhere in the article is T-Mobile or Deutsche Telecom mentioned in the context of a takeover of BT. This is about BT and EE - which admittedly does have a T-Mobile component, but it is BT that is buying up EE.  Several articles describe the transaction e.g http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/mediatechnologyandtelecoms/telecoms/11765459/EE-declares-merger-of-Orange-and-T-Mobile-complete-after-five-years.html



However, the issues at hand are the problematic significant market power residing in BT's Openreach when it comes to controlling access to fixed infrastructure and their ability to impair competitors (mobile or fixed) in getting economic backhaul or copper/fibre access to premises coupled with the over abundance of prime spectrum that the combined BT/EE entity will now own. 
VernonDozier 10/20/2015 | 5:38:45 PM
Seems like a real bad idea It's real amazing that the british would even consider allowing a germany company like T-Mobile the option to acquire BT.

In the US, when Deutsche Telekom fell on hard times, the company actually sold parts of its network and infrastructure to other companies.   T-Mobilw was the only company shose network and coverage shrank.  I remember when they had their own coverage and service in parts of Montana and more coverage in Iowa.  To cut back on costs, T-Mobile sold those networks to Verizon, whom could afford to dedicate resources and personnel to maintaining them.  Additionally, when T-Mobile couldn't afford to hire systems administrators to manage their credit systems in-house, they paid a credit agency (Experian) to manage it instead.  Because no one was actively updating the software, maintaining audit logs, 15,000,000 T-Mobile customers were the victim of a SSN breach.

In Brittan, T-Mobile and Deutshe Telekom would probably do the same thing.

Plus, and with OpenReach, (BT's wholesale and international business)  It's like letting a thief into the house, and serving them dinner on the fine china. 
Sign In