Broadband services

Obama Backs Net Neutrality, Stuns Industry

In a move that has already set off a lobbying firestorm in Washington, D.C., President Obama is calling on the Federal Communications Commission to adopt strong net neutrality rules for both wireline and wireless providers, including Title II regulation of broadband service.

In a prepared statement issued from the White House Monday morning, Obama urged Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Tom Wheeler to "reclassify" consumer broadband service under Title II of the Communications Act. Such an action, which has been fervently pushed by consumer advocates and Internet content providers like Netflix Inc. (Nasdaq: NFLX) but just as fervently opposed by the cable and telecom industries, would grant the agency much more power over how the companies operate on the Internet.

Specifically, reclassifying ISPs under the Communications Act's Title II regulations would allow the FCC to oversee broadband similar to the way it regulates traditional phone companies. Among other things, Title II gives the FCC substantial power to set rules prohibiting providers from blocking or throttling web traffic, favoring some services over others and charging fees for prioritized "fast lane" service.

Explaining his decision, Obama said "the time has come for the FCC to recognize that broadband service is of the same importance and must carry the same obligations as so many other vital services do." He termed it "a basic acknowledgement of the services ISPs provide to American homes and businesses, and the straightforward obligations necessary to ensure the network works for everyone -- not just one or two companies."

In what might be viewed as a sop to broadband providers, Obama also urged the FCC to forbear from "rate regulation and other provisions less relevant to broadband services." But that will most likely not be nearly enough to make cable and telecom companies happy.

In addition to calling for Title II, Obama said the FCC should extend net neutrality rules to the wireless industry for the first time, a move that will undoubtedly be strongly resisted by mobile carriers. "The rules also have to reflect the way people use the Internet today, which increasingly means on a mobile device," the president said. "I believe the FCC should make these rules fully applicable to mobile broadband as well, while recognizing the special challenges that come with managing wireless networks."

The cable and phone industries immediately slammed the president's move, arguing that Title II would actually have a negative impact on broadband services by freezing investment. They threatened to take the fight against Title II regulations to Congress and the federal courts, as they have done in the past with other net neutrality proposals by the FCC. (See Poll: Net Neutrality Rules Unlikely to Deter Investors.)

"We are stunned the President would abandon the longstanding, bipartisan policy of lightly regulating the Internet and calling for extreme Title II regulation," National Cable & Telecommunications Association (NCTA) President & CEO Michael Powell said in his own prepared statement. "This is truly a matter that belongs in Congress and only Congress should make a policy change of this magnitude… We urge Congress to swiftly exercise leadership of this important issue.”

Verizon Communications Inc. (NYSE: VZ) took a similarly strong stand against Obama's call to action. "Reclassification under Title II, which for the first time would apply 1930s-era utility regulation to the Internet, would be a radical reversal of course that would in and of itself threaten great harm to an open Internet, competition and innovation," the company said on its policy blog. "That course will likely also face strong legal challenges and would likely not stand up in court."

Comcast Corp. (Nasdaq: CMCSA, CMCSK) seconded that motion in its response. "To attempt to impose a full-blown Title II regime now, when the classification of cable broadband has always been as an information service, would reverse nearly a decade of precedent, including findings by the Supreme Court that this classification was proper," the MSO said. "This would be a radical reversal that would harm investment and innovation, as today's immediate stock market reaction demonstrates. And such a radical reversal of consistent contrary precedent should be taken up by the Congress."

Both Verizon and Comcast argued that the FCC should use its existing authority until Section 706 rules to promote greater transparency, prohibit traffic blocking and throttling, ban discrimination and forbid prioritization" of traffic into "fast lanes," as Obama is seeking.

Obama's move comes a week after AT&T Inc. (NYSE: T) CEO Randall Stephenson took the unusual step of meeting personally with FCC Chair Tom Wheeler to urge him not to apply Title II rules for broadband as part of the agency's new Open Internet rules. According to a federal filing, Stephenson's rare personal plea said such a move would "negatively impact" investment in broadband infrastructure and thus run counter to the FCC's determination to make broadband more widely available, at higher speeds.

United States Telecom Association (USTelecom) , the Washington lobby group for telecom service providers, has also been stressing the potential negative impact on investment. In late October, US Telecom issued a report citing a research paper by Anna-Maria Kovacs, visiting scholar with the Georgetown University Center for Business and Public Policy, which said the investment community believes a "heavy-handed regulatory approach" such as broad imposition of Title II status would have a negative impact on future broadband investment.

Not surprisingly, net neutrality proponents, who have been urging the White House and FCC to act, embraced Obama's statement. "The president who promised to take a back seat to no one on net neutrality has finally gotten into the driver's seat," said Free Press President & CEO Craig Aaron in a statement. "And he may have saved the Internet at the moment it was in the greatest jeopardy."

Find out more about key developments related to broadband on Light Reading's dedicated broadband channel.

Obama's statement, which comes less than a week after the Republicans gained control of both houses of Congress, will add to the mounting pressure on Wheeler, who has said that he is open to Title II as well as other legal approaches that would strengthen the net neutrality concept. In his own statement Monday, Wheeler said he was "grateful for the input of the president" and promised that the FCC would "incorporate the President's submission into the record." But he didn't say what action he would take. (See Net Neutrality: Latest Proposal Will Make Everybody Unhappy.)

"Like the President, I believe that the Internet must remain an open platform for free expression, innovation, and economic growth," said Wheeler. "We both oppose Internet fast lanes."

— Alan Breznick, Cable/Video Practice Leader, Light Reading

Page 1 / 2   >   >>
GregW333 11/16/2014 | 2:42:42 PM
Re: Missed the election and gets the tech wrong Let Obama know that




nasimson 11/13/2014 | 9:04:30 PM
a precedent for other countries to follow I am glad the President and the Whitehouse took a clear stand finally. Given the humungous campaign funding by corporates (recall the Supreme Court case of Citizens United V FEC) I was frankly not expecting it. So its a breath of fresh air. I dont live in US, but the settlement of matters there would become a precedent for other countries to follow. So whatever is the outcome of this debate, has far-reaching implications farther than current geography and lasting longer than current generation.
TomNolle 11/11/2014 | 9:40:37 PM
Re: Well, Not Much Choice Re Title II I agree that this isn't the Congress to take on Telecom reform, but I don't know if we'll ever see one that has the right stuff!
brooks7 11/11/2014 | 10:08:45 AM
Re: Well, Not Much Choice Re Title II
Do you guys think they misunderstand Universal Service Obligations and a "Broadband COLR" with Net Neutrality and Title II?

After re-reading the President's note, I think they do in part.

Duh! 11/11/2014 | 9:35:34 AM
Re: Well, Not Much Choice Re Title II House Telecom subcommittee have been quietly (stealthily) laying the groundwork for a Telecom act update in the next session.  From what little they've made public, it seems that all the almost-but-not-quite-crazy Right's tropes about "enterprise good, regulation baaad" are going to be catered to. As are (ahem) big campaign contributors.  

Now, it's clear that the 1996 Act (written with a Democratic chair and majority) was bad law for an industry on the cusp of disruptive change.  It badly needs to be rewritten.   Just not by this crowd.
russoccam 11/10/2014 | 10:24:31 PM
Obama Wants More Regulation? Hardly a surprise when Obama wants more regulation.  The idea of investment and return on investment is not something he seems to understand.  Next week he will likely be bashing providers for the US being behind in broadband speeds and coverage.
kq4ym 11/10/2014 | 9:40:48 PM
Re: Ineffective Posturing? It's a sure thing the President's political opponents aren't going to take it lying down. It's a popular stand to take for consumers, but industry folks are not going to let neutrality live much longer I would certainly guess. It's still going to take a lot of public input and comments to the FCC to help Obama get his preference over industry lobbying.
Phil_Britt 11/10/2014 | 7:08:52 PM
Ineffective Posturing? After the mid-term elections, I'm not sure that Obama's position on Net Neutrality will carry that much weight. 
DanJones 11/10/2014 | 7:03:29 PM
Re: Missed the election and gets the tech wrong Senator Ted Cruz weighs in via Twitter:

"Net Neutrality" is Obamacare for the Internet; the Internet should not operate at the speed of government.

brooks7 11/10/2014 | 4:32:18 PM
Re: Missed the election and gets the tech wrong I spent a long time this morning talking to my son about this.

I guess what I have to say is, the conversation is a nightmare.  As important at all of this is to all of us and people in general, it is hard to explain the complexity of the situation to folks.

Look I like the notion of Net Neutrality, but here is what I really want:

- ISPs to invest to make services better

- ISPs allowed to make a reasonable profit

- Content arrives at my home with all the quality that it needs to be usable.

My concern with the implementation of Title II is that it stops line item 1 and people hook up to the Internet backbone with a 56K modem.  There is no requirement that makes them do more.

So, yes Tom I hope we get a 3rd choice.  

Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Sign In