x

Out of the Lab: 100 Tbit/s

A group of U.K. universities calling itself the Ultrafast Photonics Collaboration (UPC) is working on ways to push transmission technologies to new limits. It's aiming to cram 100 terabits per second down a single strand of fiber -- more than ten times the current record (see Siemens Claims Speed Record).

The universities -- St. Andrews, Bristol, Glasgow, Heriot-Watt, and Imperial College, London -- have already secured US$18 million (£12.5 million) of government funding for the six-year project.

And now the UPC is trying to figure out how it's going to achieve its 100-Tbit/s target.

So far, only one thing's for sure. The UPC is going to use femtosecond pulses. These mind-bogglingly short bursts of light are about 10,000 times shorter than the pulses in a 10-Gbit/s signal. Therefore, on a single channel, they would provide 10,000 times more information-carrying capacity, or 100 Tbit/s. (To put this in perspective, there are one thousand million million femtoseconds in a second.)

Of course, if it were easy to carry traffic with such ultrashort pulses of light, folk would be doing it already. They're not doing it because light sources, modulators, and detectors that can operate at such phenomenal speeds don't exist. And then there are things like dispersion to consider. Femtosecond pulses behave in a non-linear way when they travel down an optical fiber, or any other material. In other words, their behavior is difficult to predict.

Carrying all the information on a single channel is one possible scenario, but it's not the only one. In its research proposal, the UPC outlines an alternative method of exploiting femtosecond pulses, which it terms "spectral slicing."

This has similarities with wavelength-division multiplexing (WDM) and takes advantage of the fact that femtosecond pulses are composed of a broad range of wavelengths. By shining the pulses on the equivalent of a prism -- possibly an arrayed waveguide grating or other grating -- it is possible to split each pulse into a rainbow of its constituent wavelengths. Next, groups of wavelengths can be modulated separately. It sounds complicated, but effectively the pulses are acting as a single, broadband source with a total system bandwidth of, say, 200 nanometers.

"It is reasonable to suppose that this type of source will provide the potential for ten separate 2.5 Tbit/s channels thus constituting a total transmission rate of 25 Tbit/s," the research proposal states.

Bristol University's Ian White, who directs the systems aspect of the UPC work, points out that individual channel speeds of 2.5 Tbit/s aren't significantly higher than what's already been accomplished in the lab. A single-channel bit rate of 1.28 Tbit/s has already been achieved by NTT Corp., according to a paper it presented at the European Conference on Optical Communications last September.

However, the key here is not really the speed of the individual channels; it's the broadband nature of the system. It's no good maximizing bit rate without also considering system bandwidth, because there is a tradeoff between the two (see Essex Claims 4000-Channel DWDM). As a rule of thumb, the maximum attainable bit rate is roughly equal to the channel spacing. By that reckoning, each 2.5-Tbit/s channel requires at least 20nm of bandwidth to itself.

"That's why we're exploring materials that will provide broad bandwidths, such as quantum dots [tiny semiconductor particles] and polymers," says White (see Zia Laser's Not-so-Dotty Idea).

The quantum dot work at Imperial College focuses on wavelengths around 1300nm, while the polymers being developed at Bristol University, Imperial College, and St. Andrews operate at visible wavelengths (400 to 750 nm). The UPC isn't tied to any one wavelength regime or technology at this stage. It's more a case of backing lots of wild horses and hoping that one of them finishes the race.

The universities' efforts are being backed by commercial component vendors that have signed up as project partners. They include Agilent Technologies Inc. (NYSE: A), Kymata Ltd., JDS Uniphase Inc. (Nasdaq: JDSU), Marconi Communications PLC, (Nasdaq/London: MONI), Nortel Networks Corp. (NYSE/Toronto: NT), Sharp Corp., and Vitesse Semiconductor Corp. (Nasdaq: VTSS).

– Pauline Rigby, senior editor, Light Reading http://www.lightreading.com

Peter Heywood 12/4/2012 | 9:02:36 PM
re: Out of the Lab: 100 Tbit/s Who else is aiming to push the limits on the carrying capacity of fiber?

What technologies are they trying?
Pauline Rigby 12/4/2012 | 9:02:35 PM
re: Out of the Lab: 100 Tbit/s We did check out Omniguide. See http://www.lightreading.com/do...

But making a better fiber won't avoid issues to do with generating, modulating and detecting fast signals.

Alternatively, you're gonna need lots of low capacity channels. It would take 10,000 times 10 Gbit/s to achieve 100Tbit/s.

The question is: what's the best compromise between high bit rates and number of channels.
[email protected] 12/4/2012 | 9:02:35 PM
re: Out of the Lab: 100 Tbit/s Another major approach is to get a better "fiber". An MIT group, J. D. Joannopoulos and E. L. Thomas have an interesting, if difficult to construct, optical waveguide. Check out www.omni-guide.com

Dave Baldwin
[email protected] 12/4/2012 | 9:02:33 PM
re: Out of the Lab: 100 Tbit/s I figured LR must've seen OmniGuide, so I was recalling it for your readers. Your logic is flawless and questions the right ones. Economically, high bit rate is to be preferred over high channel count due to reduced component count. But then you reduce wavelength routing flexibility (which hardly exists yet anyway). Once wavelength routing is commonplace, I think it'll be hard to live without, so I vote (guess) that slower bit rates, if 40 Gbit/s can be called slow, and higher channel count will be favored by the market.
Dave Baldwin, 4Wave
bayestate 12/4/2012 | 9:02:31 PM
re: Out of the Lab: 100 Tbit/s Hi Peter-

I am aware of LMGR (Light Management Group) filing for a US patent for an "Information Compressor for Fiber Optic Lines" back in April of 2000.
http://206.180.192.32/nonflas042500.html

This neet "OUT OF THE LAB UPC" piece by Pauline Rigby and also your question in post#1 here, made me think back to the LMGR 4/00 news release.

I also thought about about LMGR's 12/20/00 Conference call where the CEO of LMGR Barrington Simon answers a caller...

B. Simon: "...Well what I have said to several people, we have -- We will be in Anaheim and we will see you in Anaheim with some other technologies that we plan on demonstrating at that time..." from LMGR CC 12/20/00 TRANNSCRIPT http://www.ragingbull.altavist...

Hope that answers part of your question posed.

Anyway Peter, thanx for the good writing with others at the LR staff and I am appreciative of how much LR provides education wise to persons like myself who do not come from a traditional FO backround. Because of entities like LR, I have become intrigued and passionate about making a career change eventually into the FO sector. LR is is a great place to learn how to do so and establish a diversified and dynamic FO core knowledge base imho...

Anyway, thanks again for the quality pieces here and for enlightening both industry and non industry types in this amazingly vibrant, facinating and rapidly continually changing field.

Happy New Year!

[email protected]

Peter Heywood 12/4/2012 | 9:01:44 PM
re: Out of the Lab: 100 Tbit/s Thanks for your kind remarks.

Pauline wrote a piece on LMGR's demo of its acousto-optic switch a few weeks ago. In it, she mentioned that LMGR had previously announced some other developments based on the same fundamental technology - and that these developments appear to have been put on the back-burner. See:

http://www.lightreading.com/do...

After what we thought was a pretty positive story, LMGR's stockprice took a big plunge and we were inundated with insulting messages from what looked like LMGR shareholders.

I half suspect this posting is going to bring back the loony brigade.

Peter Heywood
Light Reading




zeek 12/4/2012 | 8:56:40 PM
re: Out of the Lab: 100 Tbit/s Has any checking been done concerning Lumera, a new company formed by Microvision of Bothell, WA?. Based on work by Larry Dalton and associates in chromophore based optical modulator.. Tied in with the University of Washington and their photonics department.http://www.lumera.com/html_only/press...
Pauline Rigby 12/4/2012 | 8:56:40 PM
re: Out of the Lab: 100 Tbit/s Yes, see http://www.lightreading.com/do....

Pauline Rigby
HOME
Sign In
SEARCH
CLOSE
MORE
CLOSE