x
Optical components

OneChip Readies EPON Parts

Startup OneChip Photonics Inc. says it's ready to launch its EPON transceivers, the first step in finding out if chip integration is going to be enough to build a viable business in a crowded market.

The parts, OneChip's first, are getting shown off this week at the China International Optoelectronics Exposition (CIOE), billed as the biggest optical tradeshow. (But they cheat by including stuff like LED lighting.)

OneChip is designing PON transceivers that integrate multiple components into, you know, one chip. Those chips are built out of indium phosphide (InP) and manufactured by Sanmina Corp. (Nasdaq: SANM). (See OneChip Tries Infinera's Trick.)

OneChip expects the EPON transceivers to be commercially available in the fourth quarter. Customers haven't had samples long enough to commit to making real orders, says Andy Weirich, OneChip's vice president of product line management.

One advantage of monolithic integration is not having to align the components; manual alignment, to make sure the light hits the right spots, has traditionally made optical components manufacturing a slow and expensive process.

Infinera uses monolithic InP integration in its DTN system for DWDM transport -- but Infinera is going after a high-end market. OneChip, by contrast, is chasing a commodity market that's going to demand a low-priced product.

Speaking of which -- PON transceivers are a notoriously overcrowded market, and considering the parts have to be inexpensive in the first place, it's tough to make money, let alone get noticed as a startup.

But OneChip claims it can lower the price by 20 to 25 percent, enough to tip equipment vendors to profitability on ONTs. And it's not going to do that by selling its transceivers at a loss.

"We fully intend to make money at this," Weirich says. "If we thought we would make money at the same rate as our competitors, I don't think we would have gotten into this."

"Ultimately, they're not going to slash the price of the ONT in half or anything, but it's a reduction in cost that's needed," says Sterling Perrin, an analyst with Heavy Reading. "The ONT ultimately needs to be comparable in price to copper at some point, and now, they're separated by hundreds of dollars."

EPON happens to be the dominant PON variant in Asia, but the real reason why OneChip is announcing EPON first is because GPON isn't yet possible for the company.

The GPON standard has settled upon what are called Class B+ optics, which meet a more demanding set of specifications than average parts. The result has been that most transceiver vendors use an avalanche photodiode (APD) as the optical receiver -- and APDs aren't aren't a good candidate for OneChip's type of monolithic integration.

To get the proper optical-receiver sensitivity, OneChip intends to integrate a semicondutor optical amplifier (SOA) into its GPON devices. "That's something that's taken us a little bit longer to develop," Weirich says.

— Craig Matsumoto, West Coast Editor, Light Reading

Peter Krug 12/5/2012 | 3:56:56 PM
re: OneChip Readies EPON Parts

SPAM! This is not a comment. It is spam, and needs to be removed from this site. The poster should be blacklisted.

jollywd 12/5/2012 | 3:56:19 PM
re: OneChip Readies EPON Parts

Nice post...This is information is new for me,i don't know about but thanks you for sharing theses wonderful informations.i think it will be very helpful for me in future.


Max Acai Boost


 

inauniversefarfaraway 12/5/2012 | 3:55:00 PM
re: OneChip Readies EPON Parts

Jim must have a goat picture of somebody to get public funding for his latest "brainchild". It is difficult to figure out how this startup ever got funded, especially with taxpayer money.


These guys take a virtually identical idea from a neighboring company, Enablence, and skimp on manufacturing to go after the same market.


Most peculiar is that the idea of coupling these devices instead of using monolithic technology is baffling to say the least. Does anyone remember the monumental failure of JDS? Even on the assembly line, it was a fiasco how components were bodged together to meet specifications. A laughing stock.


Now they are claiming a paltry 25% savings. In the end, the outcome is very likely to be that the cost differential isn't worth the risk of non-working hardware.


This is going to be nice to watch. It seems fitting that Jim is on welfare...

deauxfaux 12/5/2012 | 3:55:00 PM
re: OneChip Readies EPON Parts

This is Gary Morgenthaler's investment (Morgenthaler Ventures) and Gary backed Jim Hjartarson before....so since jim produced a modest positive return the last time (Catena), he thinks it will happen again.


The technology is old Metrophotonics stuff and you know what happened to them. The simple truth is that using InP for the transistors is unneccessarily expensive when SiGe is much cheaper and wire bonds are a few pennies. Any gains get eaten up by yield losses due to complexity. Infinera dumped that approach for those reasons a long time ago; they are smart guys.


Going into EPON even with B+ is going to be a bloodbath for them. All it will take is the APD guys to start dropping their prices when/if they start losing business to B+ and it is all over. The bigger guys will drop prices on this stuff in a heartbeat if they can average the loss over a larger basked of business.


OneChip=CowChip IMHO

paolo.franzoi 12/5/2012 | 3:55:00 PM
re: OneChip Readies EPON Parts

"Ultimately, they're not going to slash the price of the ONT in half or anything, but it's a reduction in cost that's needed," says Sterling Perrin, an analyst with Heavy Reading. "The ONT ultimately needs to be comparable in price to copper at some point, and now, they're separated by hundreds of dollars."



I guess I am confused by this.  Indoor ONTs deployed at NTT are well under $100.  Are copper prices negative?


 


seven


 

HOME
Sign In
SEARCH
CLOSE
MORE
CLOSE