VoLTE/Rich communications

Operators Can't Kik the OTT Habit

Do you Kik? Ever even heard of it? Maybe not unless you're under the age of 20, but it's the latest over-the-top (OTT) platform to join the 100 million club and give the operators a run for their SMS revenues.

The mobile messaging app announced today that it has more than 100 million registered users, triple what it had this time last year. The app has been around since 2010, but Kik CEO Ted Livingston tells CNet it's now signing up around 250,000 new registrants every day, primarily teens in the US.

Kik is essentially another SMS alternative, but it lets its users pick a user name rather than use their phone number. So you can give out your Kik name over other popular OTT sites such as Instagram, Tumblr, and Twitter to chat without having to reveal your phone number. People aren't using it because of the expense of SMS, but because it's more fun.

Kik is also using open APIs to let third-party developers build apps on top of the messaging service for games, music-sharing, or location-based services. One game, Costume Party, a mobile version of Pictionary for Kik users, already has around 4 million users.

One-hundred million may not carry the weight that it used to -- WeChat and Line have around 300 million, and KakaoTalk, Viber, and Tango have all cracked 100 million -- but what's remarkable to me is the level of innovation that continuously comes from the OTT camp, as well as the success that so many of them are having. Kik is now getting more downloads than another OTT success WhatsApp in the US, but WhatsApp is managing to hold on to more than 350 million users.

The traditional knock on OTTs is that they can't achieve ubiquity, like SMS, but that is increasingly becoming a moot point. It's also becoming clear that this type of innovation won't (ever?) come from the wireless operators. The smart ones are striking partnerships in the space, but even those, like Sprint Corp. (NYSE: S) with Jibe, don't even come close. Frankly, even Telefonica Digital's much-heralded homegrown Tu Go service that lets you text from your tablet is boring in comparison to what the OTTs are doing. (See Sprint Jibes With OTT Comms, Genband Acquires fring to Help CSPs Go OTT, Meet Voxox, the OTT CLEC, and Et Tu, Telefónica?)

I'm not sure what the answer is here. I've come to realize it's just not in operators' DNA to be this innovative. I would suggest that they partner, but I'm not sure a company such as Kik or WhatsApp would be interested. SMS certainly isn't dying, but it's also not thriving, and OTTs continue to point out how much it lacks.

The operators could learn a lot from these OTT players, and, if they're smart, they'll play close attention to how the next generation of mobile users chooses to communicate.

— Sarah Reedy, Senior Editor, Light Reading

Page 1 / 3   >   >>
Kruz 1/21/2014 | 6:10:01 PM
Re: OTT or Zipwhip Its indeed innovative. That should happen when ott and operators work together.
lborgstede 1/21/2014 | 1:37:07 PM
OTT or Zipwhip

If you look closely you'll see plenty of new innovation in SMS. Last week at CES, Zipwhip and AT&T revealed a new iPhone cloud texting breakthrough. And then there's business texting. Thanks to companies like Zipwhip more than 200 million business landline and toll free numbers can be equipped with SMS texting. Police departments, radio stations, non-profits and other organizations are adding texting capabilities to their existing landline and toll free numbers to field customer inquiries, schedule appointments, send out reminders, take sales orders and improve customer loyalty. That seems innovative to me.

Sarah Thomas 12/17/2013 | 4:34:07 PM
Re: WhatsApp iMessage does it for me on the iPhone, but that is OTT, and I'm not that young and hip. The native experience on Android was surprisingly bad for MMS, video sharing and group messages. I would have definitely used on OTT app if I stuck with Android.
Kruz 12/17/2013 | 4:31:12 PM
Re: WhatsApp True. But other than price and anonymity, people also opt for OTT players for a richer experience. SMS doesn't satisfy users need for an instantaneous 2 way chat with video, imaging, groups, etc... OTT's all in all experience evolved in a way SMS's experience should have.
Sarah Thomas 12/17/2013 | 10:29:18 AM
Re: Kik I'm not sure how much one is cannabolizing the others, but that's a good question. Most have very similar feature sets, which is one reason why they can't all last. But, ultimately, you go where your friends are. People would get bored pretty quickly -- or move on to the next app -- if everyone they know is too.
Sarah Thomas 12/17/2013 | 10:27:52 AM
Re: WhatsApp That is true for WhatsApp and other OTTs, but Kik, in particular, has said that isn't the case. Most of its users have unlimited SMS plans. They are using it because they like the anonymity of a user name instead of their phone number, so they can connect with people on social networks. Like GroupMe, WhatsApp and others, I think people also like Kik for group messaging with their non iPhone friends.
elligottmc 12/17/2013 | 9:46:31 AM
WhatsApp Maybe I missed this point in my skimming of the article, but one of the main reasons WhatsApp has caught on with the younger crowd (and older lads like me) is that it gets around messaging costs for texting, particularily international.  Get an ID and a data connection and your in business.  One thing the youth know how to do is avoid expenses.  OTT is the ultimate workaround.  Therefore it will continue to thrive (much to the chagrin of providers).
DOShea 12/16/2013 | 10:47:02 PM
Re: Kik Are any of the other OTT apps looking like fads to any degree? I know with hundreds of millions of users, the obvious answer is know, but when a newer one comes along like kik, how is it affecting the growth pace of the older apps, if at all?
MordyK 12/13/2013 | 11:22:52 AM
Re: Telco as identity unfortunately my optimism is tempered with those doubts as well.
Sarah Thomas 12/13/2013 | 10:30:48 AM
Re: Telco as identity I hope you're right, Mordy! They have the assets, as you say, but I have a hard time believing they'll build it in house or partner in a way that leverages the innovation of the OTTs without crushing it internally.
Page 1 / 3   >   >>
Sign In