& cplSiteName &

The Mobile Network Is Becoming a Cloud Service

Phil Harvey
9/18/2018
100%
0%

At Mobile World Congress Americas, the cloud and 5G loomed large and, frequently, were part of the same story.

One example: Affirmed Networks Inc. announced a "Mobile Network as a Service" offering, wherein it made its virtualized Evolved Packet Core (vEPC) available to mobile operators on Amazon Web Services Inc. (See Affirmed Networks Launches 'Mobile Network as a Service'.)

With that offering, in theory, a network operator could secure spectrum and begin offering mobile voice and data services in any geography where AWS is accessible without needing to build their own network. Enterprises and MVNOs can, as an example, take an offering like Affirmed's and provide IoT connectivity for their own devices or as a service to other customers.

"This is a very logical extension of the Affirmed NFV platform into a cloud platform and what we're announcing now is… all the things that service providers love about our platform -- the automation, the time to deployment, the same levels of reliability -- now apply all of those on AWS," said Amit Tiwari, Affirmed Networks’ VP of strategic alliances and systems engineering.

This sort of offering combines all the things we love about the cloud, with the freedom of mobile computing. It creates an opportunity for service providers but also adds some pressure on them to deliver services at different, competitive price points.

Eventually, network operators of all mobile services are going to have to justify the cost of running their networks against "public cloud pricing or public cloud benchmarks," according to Gabriel Brown, principal analyst for mobile networks and 5G at Heavy Reading . As more mobile network operator functions are subsumed into the cloud, that day gets nearer.

Also, this is an important announcement from Affirmed because it gets them out in front of the conversation, a valuable thing when you're a network infrastructure specialist.

"I think it's safe to say they're competing against four other vendors -- Nokia, Ericsson, Cisco and Huawei," Brown said. "It's definitely safe to say that all four of those vendors are investigating the model -- and I would say Nokia and Cisco have probably made more progress [out of that group]."

Other vendors might be in this ballpark already. Expeto, for example, offers an LTE core network via a Platform as a Service offering. Also, Athonet offers what it calls a software-based mobile packet core solution "for centralized or highly distributed edge-cloud deployments." Either one of those two vendors could very likely be offering a mobile network as a service, but the potential customers and use cases might differ from what Affirmed is targeting.

Affirmed has one customer talking about the need for this kind of service, but it doesn't yet have a paying customer using the Mobile Network as a Service in AWS, as announced. The company hopes to be able to talk about some case studies soon -- and that's where I think the story gets really interesting.

— Phil Harvey, US News Editor, Light Reading

(13)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
kelseywilson
50%
50%
kelseywilson,
User Rank: Light Beer
11/16/2018 | 9:50:31 PM
Cloud network
I believe this trend will continue. These services and some others that do not entail sensitive data have been successfully delivered cross-borders and continents, without even enterprise customers necessarily knowing the exact location of data or data centers origin.
John Eliter
50%
50%
John Eliter,
User Rank: Light Beer
11/4/2018 | 12:04:46 PM
Re: Web clouds cannot replace smartcric telco clouds
This sort of offering combines all the things we love about the cloud, with the freedom of mobile computing. It creates an opportunity for service providers but also adds some pressure on them to deliver services at different, competitive price points.

 
kelseywilson
50%
50%
kelseywilson,
User Rank: Light Beer
11/3/2018 | 11:20:25 PM
Cloud network
Generally it has been said that SMEs and startups are more inclined to go for public cloud services (web servers, storage, etc.), while larger companies move more cautiously and either prefer to establish a private cloud environment or a hybrid context. When it comes to software as a service (SaaS), it‘s clear that companies of all sizes are already moving a lot of services into the cloud, including CRM (Salesforce), email and office applications (Office365, Google Apps, etc). I believe this trend will continue. These services and some others that do not entail sensitive data have been successfully delivered cross-borders and continents, without even enterprise customers necessarily knowing the exact location of data or data centers origin.
jackpeter9051
50%
50%
jackpeter9051,
User Rank: Light Beer
10/22/2018 | 8:02:31 PM
Re: VMWare?
Yes, it is one of the most popular and attracting inventions in this age of technology and now the mobile networks are going to be served as the cloud service and it gives us a bunch of facilities like storing the data on the mobile, printing anything directly connecting a printer with the mobile and many more. In the case of printing, you may face a different type of errors, but those can be fixed by Epson printer error 0x69, you can also get lots of redirection to solve other errors in this regarding. 
TelcoWelder
50%
50%
TelcoWelder,
User Rank: Light Beer
9/22/2018 | 1:04:11 AM
Re: Costs
For IoT or an MVNO who wants to start out with thier own EPC (smart move), this can be a good entry option - despite the costs - due to no lag time for servers, networking, etc. Not worth flogging the dead horse argument that renting servers is cheaper. TCO in AWS is a matter of scale, and it takes a lot to get close.
brooks7
50%
50%
brooks7,
User Rank: Light Sabre
9/20/2018 | 12:05:45 PM
Costs
 

AWS is probably wildly inappropriate to use to offer these kinds of services.  The cost to rent the hardware is dramatically higher than dropping servers in data centers.  Go run the math.  You will see it is about 3x the cost.  The reason to use AWS here would be some form of peak load challenges whether that is turn up of major new traffic, working around network failures or some other form change based challenge.

If you are renting spectrum and deploying radios just to smack yourself in the head and say "Hey we should have bought some routers.", then your company has much bigger problems.  Unlike Enterprise networks, service provider networks need to optimize for cost.  AWS has nothing to do with building low cost anything.

seven

 
t.bogataj
50%
50%
t.bogataj,
User Rank: Light Sabre
9/20/2018 | 2:54:36 AM
Web clouds cannot replace telco clouds
AWS or any other web cloud may be good for some things, but it is unable to provide carrier-grade reliability, responsiveness, latency, etc. Not to mention connectivity and other parts of the equation.

On the other hand, if you add telco capabilities to web clouds and harden the connectivity, it looses the initial cost attractiveness.

So, what's in it for MVNOs?

T.
Gabriel Brown
50%
50%
Gabriel Brown,
User Rank: Light Sabre
9/19/2018 | 5:02:43 AM
Re: Secure spectrum and offer mobile services without needing to build a network
the major barrier to entry in mobile and 5G is spectrum and the radio access network

You don't need to be an expert to figure that out! For the most part right now we are talking about IoT and enterprise core networks using leased radio access. MVNOs and operator sub-brands are also candidates.
Gabriel Brown
50%
50%
Gabriel Brown,
User Rank: Light Sabre
9/19/2018 | 4:59:00 AM
Re: Secure spectrum and offer mobile services without needing to build a network
if you had signficant user plane traffic you might find hosting the EPC yourself was cheaper than using AWS.

Yes, this is a major barrier, alhtough perhaps less acute for IoT. Cloud platforms will have to reduce cost signifcantly to carry 4G/5G user-plane. There are a few options  for this.
iainmorris
50%
50%
iainmorris,
User Rank: Blogger
9/19/2018 | 4:19:04 AM
Re: Secure spectrum and offer mobile services without needing to build a network
I tend to agree with James. I am not the expert here (Gabriel?) but I was under the impression that the major barrier to entry in mobile and 5G is spectrum and the radio access network, which seems to account for the vast bulk of the cost. And then, as James says, you need that fiber in the ground for backhaul and transport - also expensive.
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
More Blogs from The Philter
5G networks are blurring the lines between what can be done on fixed and mobile networks. And, of course, Verizon and all of the companies building these networks are changing, too. We look a Verizon's recent restructuring and speculate what it might mean for the telco as 5G fever kicks into high gear.
CenturyLink has confirmed that the former Level 3 CTO Andrew Dugan will be the carrier's new technology boss. Aamir Hussain, CenturyLink's CTO since 2014, is leaving the company.
The need to deploy infrastructure to support 5G services is having an impact on just about every smart cities discussion and plan. Even when 5G isn't on the menu, some cities are asking for multi-decade public-partnerships, a chance for someone to influence the next major tech transition.
With one of its most important software updates coming up this month, Aqsacom CEO Gilles Blanc discusses his company's background, technology edge and why 5G is so challenging to cyber-intelligence firms.
Infinera closed its acquisition of Coriant today, creating one of the world's largest optical networking providers with 600 customers around the world. But talk of a major account challenge mounted by Ciena sent the company's stock tumbling more than 15%.
Featured Video
Flash Poll
Upcoming Live Events
December 4-6, 2018, Lisbon, Portugal
March 12-14, 2019, Denver, Colorado
April 2, 2019, New York, New York
April 8, 2019, Las Vegas, Nevada
May 6-8, 2019, Denver, Colorado
All Upcoming Live Events