US Cellular Seeking New 5G OFDM Waveform

CHICAGO -- ATIS 5G Symposium at the Big Telecom Event -- US Cellular CTO Michael Irizarry has doubts around how fast 5G will develop, but he is fairly certain of the fact that it will require a new waveform, albeit one that is based on OFDM (orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing).

Speaking at the Alliance for Telecommunications Industry Solutions (ATIS) 5G Symposium ahead of BTE here, Irizarry, EVP and CTO, Engineering and Information Services, of Chicago-based operator U.S. Cellular Corp. (NYSE: USM), said that he thought Universal Filtered OFDM (UF-OFDM) would emerge as the waveform for 5G.

UF-OFDM is a new radio access technology (RAT) championed by Alcatel-Lucent (NYSE: ALU). It's a radio access technology (RAT) that can support everything from low-bandwidth, low-powered Internet of Things devices to high-bandwidth video. (See 5G: Generation Gap.)

Other potential RATs proposed for 5G include Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. 's OF-OFDM and SCDMA, NTT DoCoMo Inc. (NYSE: DCM)'s non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA), Filter Bank Multicarrier (FBMC) or Universal Filtered Multicarrier (UFMC). (See Alcatel-Lucent, Huawei Pitch 5G Radio Technologies and Getting Massive at DoCoMo's 5G Lab.)

Irizarry didn't make a hard plug for UF-OFDM, but rather stressed the importance that the 5G waveform is some type of OFDM. "The distinction between these waveforms considered for 5G and OFDM we use today is the new type of OFDM allows filtering down to the sub-carrier level, down to the resource block level, which allows for greater flexibility and coexistence with today's technologies," Irizarry said.

"I believe there will be a new waveform, and the new waveform will be required to support the extreme throughput demands of some of the use cases and the very low latency other use cases will require," the CTO added. "The key question around the new waveform is whether or not it will work its way down to low-band spectrum."

Find all the news, views, sites and sounds from the Big Telecom Event on our dedicated show site here on Light Reading.

Speaking later in the day, Manish Jindal, Vice President & CTO, Broadband and Media, Ericsson AB (Nasdaq: ERIC), also added the question of what UF-OFDM would cost. He said it will be about four times as expensive as traditional OFDM, so there is a lot of work going on to keep the costs down. Ericsson isn't taking a hard line in the vendor waveform debate, but wants to play a role in creating industry consensus, he said.

The different waveform standards proposed are not vastly different from one another, according to Heavy Reading Senior Analyst Gabriel Brown, but vendors are duking it out for the bragging rights alone.

"There is quite a bit of debate and a lot of jockeying in positions particularly among the big vendors and once this does hit the standards development next year, we could see a bit of fur starting to fly," Brown said after the presentations.

— Sarah Thomas, Circle me on Google+ Follow me on TwitterVisit my LinkedIn profile, Editorial Operations Director, Light Reading

TV Monitor 6/10/2015 | 2:21:39 PM
It will be a showdown then There will be a showdown soon, because Samsung says its 28 Ghz 5G does not use OFDM, rather a new waveform which Samsung refused to describe at this time. A new waveform is best suited for microwave signals that propagate at a great distance of 2 km.
kq4ym 6/9/2015 | 7:05:00 PM
Re: waveform over function With a cost of four times more, one wonders just how long it will take to either get the costs down or use the advantages of the technology that theoretically can  "support everything from low-bandwidth, low-powered Internet of Things devices to high-bandwidth video." If that can happen the cost might now be all that much to worry about?
Sarah Thomas 6/9/2015 | 2:28:24 PM
waveform over function Irizarry gave a great presentation with a healthy amount of skepticism on 5G, but also outlining what he needs from the vendors in the industry. Despite how Ericsson tried to play it down, the waveform is a big debate amongst the vendors. There is a lot of different options being thrown out there now, which is why standardization will be important in the coming years.
Sign In