x
5G

Top 5 Tech Trump Expectations for 2017

Donald Trump's policy statements on technology before the election were nearly non-existent, so what's going to happen when he becomes US President in January? Here are just a few possibilities...

1. Huawei & ZTE: USA, no way
We can be relatively certain that Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. and ZTE Corp. (Shenzhen: 000063; Hong Kong: 0763) aren't getting a sniff of US carrier business a Trump administration. It would also have been unlikely if Clinton had won instead. But Trump has named Peter Navarro to oversee US trade and industrial policy. Harvard-educated economist Navarro is the author of the 2012 documentary "Death By China." So there may be further trade impact with China beyond the Huawei and ZTE ban, as yet unknown.(See Surprise! Sprint Still Has Huawei in Its Network.)

2. We'll be FCC-ing you!
Trump has appointed two advisors to his transition team who make no bones about their desire to end Net Neutrality and gut the FCC. Jeff Eisenach and Mark Jamison joined the Trump team in November: Eisenach had previously told a government committee that, "Net Neutrality would not improve consumer welfare or protect the public interest." (See Trump Team Appoints Net Neutrality Naysayers for FCC Transition and Wheeler to Leave FCC Next Month.)

3. Trumping 5G?
The possibility of a neutered FCC does lead to an interesting question about the future of next-generation wireless services: How might a potentially hamstrung FCC handle opening up 5G spectrum? Tom Wheeler's FCC has been aggressive about moving toward opening millimeter wave spectrum for 5G use around 2020, but it's not happened yet. Will it be a priority for Trump's FCC? (See 5G in US: Will Spectrum Be the Speed Bump?)


For all the latest news on 5G, visit the 5G site here on Light Reading.


4. Bigly M&A?
If Trump can do as he promised and reduce corporate tax from 35% to 15%, that will likely mean a lot of US companies bringing cash back from overseas. Will it return in the form of share buy-backs and dividends or be used by tech titans to buy up startups and rivals to expand their reach? Probably a combination of both, but as I've reported before, the tax and regulatory environment could mean that some Yuuuge acquisitions are in our future. (See Trump Promises Tech Execs 'Easier' Trade Conditions and T-Mobile CFO on Trump: Expect More Consolidation & More Competition.)

5. Who's gonna drive you home?
Elon Musk and Uber CEO, Travis Kalanick, have been brought on as advisors to Trump. Their roles may cover a wide remit, from space travel to renewable energy. Both men, however, have a strong interest in getting self-driving cars on road. States in the US have typically set the pace on self-driving cars so far, but could that change if Musk and Kalanick have Trump's ear?

— Dan Jones, Mobile Editor, Light Reading

<<   <   Page 4 / 4
brooks7 12/29/2016 | 12:47:56 AM
Re: Trump Tech  

Dan,

The big difference is that most infrastructure builds focus on public works.  Today, the bb infrastructure is in private hands.  And we would have to say that CAF has been an utter, absolute failure.  I would love to see people call it out here for the disaster that it is.  I would ask what we would do to reformat it before we waste several billion more to fund projects that were going to get done anyway.

And wanlord...nice way to spread stereotypes,

seven
DanJones 12/28/2016 | 11:43:17 PM
Re: What about broadband? You would think broadband - be it wired or wireless - should be at the heart of an infrastructure bill but I couldn't find any indication of that.
wanlord 12/28/2016 | 7:33:05 PM
Trump Tech
Most Trump supporters think:
 
Broadband is a ring you put on your girlfriend
 
Net Neutrality is letting the fish choose what net they get caught in
 
DSL stands for "Don't Support Liberals"
 
5G is short for "5 Gallon Bucket" for scooping up roadkill
 
Wireless is yelling across the room instead of using a string between the cans
 
Encryption is as easy as Pig Latin so why are we so worried?
mendyk 12/28/2016 | 10:22:28 AM
Re: What about broadband? Given the lineup of proposed cabinet members and advisors, it shouldn't be a surprise if all the people in the flyover states get flown over. Maybe that's the price to be paid for ... winning. At any rate, you don't need broadband access to get Twitter feeds and other such sources of information. The promise -- such as it was -- of restoring jobs was a hearkening back to the mid-20th century more than a look forward.
Carol Wilson 12/28/2016 | 10:00:23 AM
What about broadband? Interesting that there is no mention of narrowing the digital divide under a Trump administration. He did well in rural areas and among voters in states where broadband access speeds have generally lagged those in the major urban areas, and he's promised to bring jobs to those regions, many of which once supported textile mills, furniture plants and other types of manufacturing jobs that have long since deserted the US. 

It would make sense to build a new digital economy on better broadband access, but let's see if Trump's FCC cares enough about those parts of the country to take action.
<<   <   Page 4 / 4
HOME
Sign In
SEARCH
CLOSE
MORE
CLOSE