x
4G/3G/WiFi

FCC's Monster Auction Ends at $45B in Bids

The Advanced Wireless Services-3 (AWS-3) auction closed at $44.89 billion in total bids Thursday. The FCC had set an initial reserve price of $10 billion.

At stake was a swathe of nationwide spectrum suitable for high-speed data wireless services. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) auctioned off 65MHz of spectrum in the 1.7GHz and 2.1GHz bands, including 50MHz of paired channels for LTE uplink and downlink. (See Mid-Band's No Turkey! FCC Auction Tops $38B.)


Need to know more about 4G? Visit Light Reading's 4G/LTE channel.


Seventy qualified bidders entered the ring. The FCC hasn't revealed the winners yet, but they are expected to be announced soon. AT&T Inc. (NYSE: T) and Verizon Wireless are expected to be among the big winners -- and spenders.

This auction sets the stage for another huge spectrum sell-off expected in 2016: The 600MHz broadcast TV "incentive" auction. The AWS-3 auction blasted past the $19.5 billion earned on the 700MHz auction in 2008. (See Verizon & AT&T Win 700 MHz Sweeps.)

— Dan Jones, Mobile Editor, Light Reading

Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Joe Stanganelli 3/18/2015 | 8:18:18 AM
Re: Definition of a monopoly/oligopoly-holding utility Thanks.  I think I read it on a dial-up BBS back in the day.  (And now I'm dating myself.)
pcharles09 3/16/2015 | 10:05:03 PM
Re: Definition of a monopoly/oligopoly-holding utility @Joe S,

The last bit of your comment was good. I've never heard it put that way but I'll certainly use it.
Joe Stanganelli 3/1/2015 | 2:50:44 AM
Re: Definition of a monopoly/oligopoly-holding utility Democracy has its problematic elements; we need look little further than the whole #TheDress meme for evidence of that.  Reportedly, more than 70% of people saw a white-and-gold dress, but the dress was -- in actuality -- blue and black.

I read somewhere once that the folly of autocracy is that it presumes that 1 man is right and 10,000 men are wrong -- whereas the folly of democracy is that it presumes that 10,000 men are right and 1 man is wrong.
pcharles09 2/28/2015 | 5:07:55 PM
Re: Definition of a monopoly/oligopoly-holding utility @Joe S,

Anytime I hear that saying, it drives me crazy. We all know that in most cases, elections are controlled by 'the players', not us 'regular people with an opinion' aka voters.

That's another reason legal monopolies grind my gears.
Joe Stanganelli 2/26/2015 | 2:36:16 PM
Re: Definition of a monopoly/oligopoly-holding utility In theory, voters -- who, theoretically, vote in people with regulatory outlooks they like and vote out people with regulatory outlooks they don't like.

Again, in theory.  ;)
pcharles09 2/26/2015 | 8:02:13 AM
Re: Definition of a monopoly/oligopoly-holding utility @Joe S,

But who regulates the regulators? That's my only concern with legal monopolies.
Joe Stanganelli 2/25/2015 | 4:31:07 AM
Re: Definition of a monopoly/oligopoly-holding utility A utility -- like your local water company or your electric company -- is a legal monopoly, and that's not unusual.  As such, it is highly regulated -- right down to the ratemaking -- to protect consumers.
pcharles09 2/20/2015 | 11:01:10 AM
Re: Definition of a monopoly/oligopoly-holding utility @Joe S,

I love hearing the term "leagal monopolies". We just resign to the fact that we can't do anything abuout it. But in other industries, it's not acceptable.
Joe Stanganelli 2/3/2015 | 3:05:12 AM
Re: Definition of a monopoly/oligopoly-holding utility @daniel: "To better serve our customers..."  ;)
danielcawrey 2/1/2015 | 2:48:20 PM
Re: Definition of a monopoly/oligopoly-holding utility More high speed data spectrum? More wireless spectrum? That sounds great! I could use all of the bandwidth I can get! I do wonder, though, that these pricey auctions are going to cause my bill to go up. 
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
HOME
SIGN IN
SEARCH
CLOSE
MORE
CLOSE