& cplSiteName &
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
User Rank: Light Sabre
4/29/2016 | 10:49:02 AM
Re: Too little too late?
I've been totally satisfied with using Roku on my older TV for a couple of years now as well as using an antenna for over the air local broadcasts. After many years of paying through the nose for a provider's DVR and set top box, I've regretted not getting rid of that stuff years earlier. Keep it simple, and save a bundle of cash.
User Rank: Light Sabre
4/21/2016 | 7:25:21 PM
Re: Too little too late?
There's an ensuring if embattled tradition of anarchism - see Ross Ulbricht's Silk Road - but enthusiasm for piracy is slightly inconsistent with a keen interest in seeing the FCC exert more power. 
User Rank: Light Sabre
4/21/2016 | 5:02:27 PM
Re: Too little too late?
To me, it seems obvious that apps are going to be the future of cable. The problem is that the providers see no incentive to opening up their platforms. That's why it has taken regulatory scrutiny to get this far. It looks like this environment is getting better and not worse, though. 
Mitch Wagner
Mitch Wagner,
User Rank: Lightning
4/21/2016 | 12:26:48 PM
Re: Too little too late?
Love that graphic. It basically boils down to: One of the reasons that media companies have problems with piracy is that pirates get a better experience than paying customers. 

Think about it. Imagine a Bizarro world where shoplifters get concierge service in brick-and-mortar stores – snacks, coffee, an attendant to carry their loot – while paying customers are escorted around in handcuffs. That's the media market today. 
User Rank: Light Sabre
4/21/2016 | 10:03:23 AM
I have to wonder what kind of caveats Comcast intends to cook into this system to protect set top box rental revenues. 


Meanwhile, the FCC has released a statement indicating they're not all that impressed:


""While we do not know all of the details of this announcement, it appears to offer only a proprietary, Comcast-controlled user interface and seems to allow only Comcast content on different devices, rather than allowing those devices to integrate or search across Comcast content as well as other content consumers subscribe to,"
User Rank: Light Sabre
4/20/2016 | 8:11:17 PM
Too little too late?
People have been 'working around' this limitation since the first cord cutters (and now cord nevers).

$50 gets you all the dedicated hardware you need, with free software, to get all the ad-free content in the world illegally on your TV. On demand. Thousands of articles and videos will walk you through the process. Had the TV / movie / cable industries embraced change instead of fighting it tooth and nail, there wouldn't be millions of people pirating their content.

Now they're faced with trying to stop the leakage and win back those people - some of which have never even used traditional TV / movie / cable services. When presented with having to pay (a lot) for hundreds of channels most people dont even want, and then having 30% of the content filled with commercials, it's not a compelling argument. With the economy where it is, can you blame people?

Complacency and thinking that success can be legislated is the industry killer. Even today, this graphic still depicts the industry mindset: the customer is the enemy.

Featured Video
Flash Poll
Upcoming Live Events
September 17-19, 2019, Dallas, Texas
October 1-2, 2019, New Orleans, Louisiana
October 10, 2019, New York, New York
October 22, 2019, Los Angeles, CA
November 5, 2019, London, England
November 7, 2019, London, UK
December 3, 2019, New York, New York
December 3-5, 2019, Vienna, Austria
March 16-18, 2020, Embassy Suites, Denver, Colorado
May 18-20, 2020, Irving Convention Center, Dallas, TX
All Upcoming Live Events