Page 1 / 2   >   >>
SkillCen56383 7/27/2015 | 9:58:39 AM
Re: Billing? It means that mobile operators have another point for billing. Since RCS is build on top of existing VAS platforms, it's possible to charge for IPmessages like for legacy messaging (also for messages from/to RCS to/from legacy customers).

I wonder, if there are any public stats from Roger Canada regarding their implementation of RCS that is quite mature already?

palat 7/23/2015 | 1:48:29 PM
Monetizing RCS I think it is a mistake to view RCS as a separate suite of services that needs to be monetized from Day 1. The initial deployment lays the foundation for other services which can be layered in, in phases.

As a first step, the existing text messaging service can be transitioned to RCS in the backend in a seamless manner without the user noticing any change to their UI. As the next step, RCS features such as Group Chat etc can be introduced to the messaging service in phases. Later, using an RCS API Gateway, the RCS Client can connect to monetizable internet, enterprise and other third party IP Services.  
Gabriel Brown 7/23/2015 | 1:27:33 PM
Re: Whats the USP??? WhatsApp is bigger in Asia and Europe. But Facebook Messenger and iMessage are big in the US. They all do the same kind of thing.
KBode 7/23/2015 | 11:09:40 AM
Re: Whats the USP??? Depends on implementation I would think. Any measure of clunkyness in the interface and these users will be quickly running toward the best app available.
Sarah Thomas 7/23/2015 | 10:40:09 AM
Re: Whats the USP??? Do you think they shouldn't have bothered deploying RCS? I don't see it as a game changer for the operators, but as a necessary evolution. My understanding is that, at least in the US, most people still use SMS, but use WhatsApp as a complementary service to fill in the holes of SMS (like in traveling abroad). Is it different in Europe?
Gabriel Brown 7/23/2015 | 10:38:00 AM
Re: Whats the USP??? RCS is about 5 years to late. Things might have been different if the operators could have organized themselves to offer something similar to WhatsApp; alas hubris got the better of them.

Still, it's not all over. The current state of messaging is good, but not great.
Sarah Thomas 7/23/2015 | 10:08:17 AM
Re: Whats the USP??? I think the biggest selling point is just the fact that it's the path of least resistance. A lot of people just use WhatsApp as a workaround because they couldn't do group messaging or WiFi texting natively. Unless they are attached to that ecosystem, I see them using T-Mobile's service by default. I certainly don't expect it to be better, but it is at least a natural evolution of SMS.
Gabriel Brown 7/23/2015 | 6:59:45 AM
Re: Whats the USP??? Group messaging across platforms (Android, iPhone, Windows, etc.) and across carriers is key. That's one reason we use WhatsApp a lot in our household.

SeniorMa76356 7/23/2015 | 3:08:22 AM
Whats the USP??? Interesting....But will it compete against the likes of WhatsApp? If so, wht about features like group messaging etc?

And what is the USP of RCS over WhatsApp? why will users migrate to RCS?


Lot of doubts before other opreators start replicating. Answers to these questions will help.



Binit Agarwalla


+91 9848003328
Kruz 7/23/2015 | 2:34:28 AM
Re: Billing? It seems the service will not be charged to customers. But should this pickup, how fast can it keep up with the software lifecycle OTT IMs have?
Page 1 / 2   >   >>