& cplSiteName &
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
MordyK
50%
50%
MordyK,
User Rank: Light Sabre
2/24/2015 | 4:18:45 PM
Re: Why not include the network?
One can argue that the network is both either a commodity, or going deeper into the network is a morass of standards. Either way they're trying to remove the burden from the model and add it on or work on it later, as the use cases and models mature.

It's not the worst idea as the connectivty is not a limited capability that require real attention early on.
jasonmeyers
50%
50%
jasonmeyers,
User Rank: Blogger
2/24/2015 | 9:51:40 AM
Why not include the network?
It strikes me as a missed opportunity to not include Comcast's network as part of this IoT development effort. If the point is to attract the next wave of innovative application developers to create applications, why not give them a high-speed network connection and even datacenter resources to use as part of their experimentation? The fact that Comcast is not worried about what network these services are riding on just seems to further commodotize the role of the network. 


Featured Video
Upcoming Live Events
September 17-19, 2019, Dallas, Texas
October 1-2, 2019, New Orleans, Louisiana
October 10, 2019, New York, New York
October 22, 2019, Los Angeles, CA
November 5, 2019, London, England
November 7, 2019, London, UK
November 14, 2019, Maritim Hotel, Berlin
December 3-5, 2019, Vienna, Austria
December 3, 2019, New York, New York
March 16-18, 2020, Embassy Suites, Denver, Colorado
May 18-20, 2020, Irving Convention Center, Dallas, TX
All Upcoming Live Events