& cplSiteName &
Comments
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First        ADD A COMMENT
mendyk
mendyk
9/4/2014 | 4:56:17 PM
fun with numbers
$19 trillion is a trillion more impressive than $18 trillion, and probably just as meaningful and on the surface much more impressive and authoritative than "really, really, REALLY big."
Matt Cramer
Matt Cramer
9/4/2014 | 5:07:28 PM
Re: fun with numbers
I believe Justin Timberlake sat Warrior down and explained: "A trillion dollars isn't cool. You know what's cool? Nineteen trillion dollars."
mhhf1ve
mhhf1ve
9/4/2014 | 6:16:01 PM
Cisco's reputation in software development?
Does anyone have an opinion on Cisco's reputation as a software developer? I'm guessing if people generally don't hold Cisco's software in high regard, then it might be difficult for Cisco to push into becoming a business partner for hardware services that require nicely integrated hardware.
Susan Fourtané
Susan Fourtané
9/5/2014 | 5:16:54 AM
Re: Cisco's reputation in software development?
mhhf1ve,

As the Internet of Things and the Internet of Everything are relatively new concepts it doesn't really matter too much anything that has been done, or not in the past. Cisco can be great developing its Internet of Everything and it seems it's doing a good job already. 

-Susan 
mhhf1ve
mhhf1ve
9/5/2014 | 4:42:15 PM
Re: Cisco's reputation in software development?

As the Internet of Things and the Internet of Everything are relatively new concepts it doesn't really matter too much anything that has been done, or not in the past. 

Hmm. Can't say I can agree with that. The past may not be a great predictor of the future, but software developers don't just magically appear overnight.... So if Cisco didn't have great developers for its platforms in the past, it might not in the future. Then again, everything is relative, so it might only need marginally better developers than its competitors... and THAT might not be a high bar in this field of IoE.

 

Susan Fourtané
Susan Fourtané
9/7/2014 | 5:08:42 AM
Re: Cisco's reputation in software development?
mhh, 

We don't have to always agree. :) Again, I don't agree with the following: 

" ... if Cisco didn't have great developers for its platforms in the past, it might not in the future." 

That's not a rule. You are basically saying that someone who hasn't performed well in an area in the past can't improve and perform better in the same, or different area. 

In any case, to what exactly you are making reference when doubting about Cisco's performance? 

-Susan 
SachinEE
SachinEE
9/7/2014 | 2:11:56 PM
Re: Cisco's reputation in software development?
GE had earlier demostrated its ability to wrap up everything into a structure that closely represented the internet of everything, in GE's case they called it the industrial internet, where they managed to tie down entire sensor network systems, clients, different areas of expertise, engineers, managers, etc into one malleabe layer of information. And to access it, the only thing you had to do was have a smartphone.
kq4ym
kq4ym
9/5/2014 | 9:33:39 AM
Re: Cisco's reputation in software development?
"Cisco is attempting to build a new engine on its plane as it loses altitude. The networking equipment on which it has built its business is facing shrinking margins, increased competition, and even the distant but real threat of commoditization from SDN and other forms of virtual networking. To keep its business thriving, Cisco needs to reposition itself as a business partner to customers, not just a hardware provider."

That does seem to be a very good summary of what's going on. Whether ever company will become a "technology company" as they seem to hope for, is probably an iffy proposition to bet the bank on. Cisco is maybe trying "Everything" in it's search for a more profitable future.
SachinEE
SachinEE
9/7/2014 | 2:07:36 PM
Re: Cisco's reputation in software development?
"That does seem to be a very good summary of what's going on. Whether ever company will become a "technology company" as they seem to hope for, is probably an iffy proposition to bet the bank on. Cisco is maybe trying "Everything" in it's search for a more profitable future."

No, not just profit. Bank value has got nothing to do with Cisco's vision. Whenever a company sets some goals, whether or not they can accomplish those, their main priority is create enough buzz to carry them on even if they do not make too much profit. Cisco is only advancing because it realizes the potential to get so much value from creating a self services web of companies.
Atlantis-dude
Atlantis-dude
9/5/2014 | 12:48:00 PM
Technology company
Every company is already one in some form or the other. Will they want to continue to buy hw and how does that make a big difference to them? 
sam masud
sam masud
9/8/2014 | 2:11:43 PM
A third way
Forget Internet of Everything or Internet of Things--how about calling it Internet X?

 

It's a thought anyway.
Executiv37157
Executiv37157
11/27/2015 | 2:24:21 PM
Final Solution Offering
I'm looking to see what Cisco ends up providing in the space. They seem to focus on some great potential areas, but may have too many focus areas at the moment. I see them helping fill the Managed Security Service Area fairly well, but time will tell.

Jason Lebrecht 


Featured Video
Upcoming Live Events
October 1-2, 2019, New Orleans, Louisiana
October 10, 2019, New York, New York
October 22, 2019, Los Angeles, CA
November 5, 2019, London, England
November 7, 2019, London, UK
November 14, 2019, Maritim Hotel, Berlin
December 3, 2019, New York, New York
December 3-5, 2019, Vienna, Austria
March 16-18, 2020, Embassy Suites, Denver, Colorado
May 18-20, 2020, Irving Convention Center, Dallas, TX
All Upcoming Live Events
Partner Perspectives - content from our sponsors
Edge Computing, the Next Great IT Revolution
By Rajesh Gadiyar, Vice President & CTO, Network & Custom Logic Group, Intel Corp
Innovations in Home Media Terminals for the Upcoming 5G Era
By Tang Wei, Vice President, ZTE Corporation
All Partner Perspectives