& cplSiteName &
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
mendyk
50%
50%
mendyk,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/30/2014 | 2:36:46 PM
Re: About Face
One possibility is Desktop Users Who Prefer To Interact Through Annoying Social Media Sites Rather Than With Actual People, but that seems a bit wordy.
Ariella
50%
50%
Ariella,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/30/2014 | 2:26:04 PM
Re: About Face
@mendyK we'll have to think of something that doesn't connote paralysis. 
mendyk
50%
50%
mendyk,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/30/2014 | 1:48:47 PM
Re: About Face
You could say "fixed" users, but that might be just as unappealing out of context.
Ariella
50%
50%
Ariella,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/30/2014 | 12:56:33 PM
Re: About Face
@mendyk is that the term, "immobile?" It sounds rather unappealing. 
smkinoshita
50%
50%
smkinoshita,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/24/2014 | 4:08:08 PM
Re: About Face
I'm aware that it's strictly mobile, I still just exptect the numbers to be much higher.
wanlord
50%
50%
wanlord,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/24/2014 | 3:34:50 PM
Re: About Face
The mobile numbers are higher, this was specific to exlusive mobile users ONLY. Meaning for whatever period they set, there was no access from a PC browser based access. I assume this means they are strictly using the app from a mobile smartphone or iPad.
mendyk
50%
50%
mendyk,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/24/2014 | 3:01:17 PM
Re: About Face
FB has a pretty significant installed base of immobile users -- think retiree boomers in the US for starters.
smkinoshita
50%
50%
smkinoshita,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/24/2014 | 2:57:06 PM
Re: About Face
Am I the only one here who thinks the numbers are a little low?  I was watching mobile numbers climb where I used to work -- their mobile numbers went from 10% to 25% to 30%, and their site was geared for destktop!  I though for sure that FB would have much higher mobile numbers, even if mobile-only -- maybe they define mobile differently? (Tablet vs. phone for example)
mendyk
50%
50%
mendyk,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/24/2014 | 12:18:49 PM
Re: About Face
Agreed that Facebook fear & loathing is being stoked mainly by what passes for the pundit class. And so far, FB has held up well against a laundry list of competitors. Ultimately, though, its success almost completely depends on retaining and continuing to build a product (its users) over which it has no direct control. FB is likely to continue to ride high as long as its core numbers hold up.
Ray@LR
50%
50%
[email protected],
User Rank: Blogger
7/24/2014 | 12:02:09 PM
Re: About Face
Yes, not so many 'facebook is an IPO disaster' blogs around these days...

 

Is it users that fear and mistrust Facebook, or bloggers/commentators? 

Personally, I feel a certain amount of 'discomfort' about the data gathering and intrusive ways of Facebook, Google et al but I use them each and every day.

The point in another message made about mobile ads is a good one though. The detailed stats behind campaigns would be interesting to see. 
Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Featured Video
Upcoming Live Events
September 17-19, 2019, Dallas, Texas
October 1-2, 2019, New Orleans, Louisiana
October 10, 2019, New York, New York
October 22, 2019, Los Angeles, CA
November 5, 2019, London, England
November 7, 2019, London, UK
December 3, 2019, New York, New York
December 3-5, 2019, Vienna, Austria
March 16-18, 2020, Embassy Suites, Denver, Colorado
May 18-20, 2020, Irving Convention Center, Dallas, TX
All Upcoming Live Events