& cplSiteName &
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
mendyk
50%
50%
mendyk,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/30/2014 | 2:36:46 PM
Re: About Face
One possibility is Desktop Users Who Prefer To Interact Through Annoying Social Media Sites Rather Than With Actual People, but that seems a bit wordy.
Ariella
50%
50%
Ariella,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/30/2014 | 2:26:04 PM
Re: About Face
@mendyK we'll have to think of something that doesn't connote paralysis. 
mendyk
50%
50%
mendyk,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/30/2014 | 1:48:47 PM
Re: About Face
You could say "fixed" users, but that might be just as unappealing out of context.
Ariella
50%
50%
Ariella,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/30/2014 | 12:56:33 PM
Re: About Face
@mendyk is that the term, "immobile?" It sounds rather unappealing. 
smkinoshita
50%
50%
smkinoshita,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/24/2014 | 4:08:08 PM
Re: About Face
I'm aware that it's strictly mobile, I still just exptect the numbers to be much higher.
wanlord
50%
50%
wanlord,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/24/2014 | 3:34:50 PM
Re: About Face
The mobile numbers are higher, this was specific to exlusive mobile users ONLY. Meaning for whatever period they set, there was no access from a PC browser based access. I assume this means they are strictly using the app from a mobile smartphone or iPad.
mendyk
50%
50%
mendyk,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/24/2014 | 3:01:17 PM
Re: About Face
FB has a pretty significant installed base of immobile users -- think retiree boomers in the US for starters.
smkinoshita
50%
50%
smkinoshita,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/24/2014 | 2:57:06 PM
Re: About Face
Am I the only one here who thinks the numbers are a little low?  I was watching mobile numbers climb where I used to work -- their mobile numbers went from 10% to 25% to 30%, and their site was geared for destktop!  I though for sure that FB would have much higher mobile numbers, even if mobile-only -- maybe they define mobile differently? (Tablet vs. phone for example)
mendyk
50%
50%
mendyk,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/24/2014 | 12:18:49 PM
Re: About Face
Agreed that Facebook fear & loathing is being stoked mainly by what passes for the pundit class. And so far, FB has held up well against a laundry list of competitors. Ultimately, though, its success almost completely depends on retaining and continuing to build a product (its users) over which it has no direct control. FB is likely to continue to ride high as long as its core numbers hold up.
Ray@LR
50%
50%
[email protected],
User Rank: Blogger
7/24/2014 | 12:02:09 PM
Re: About Face
Yes, not so many 'facebook is an IPO disaster' blogs around these days...

 

Is it users that fear and mistrust Facebook, or bloggers/commentators? 

Personally, I feel a certain amount of 'discomfort' about the data gathering and intrusive ways of Facebook, Google et al but I use them each and every day.

The point in another message made about mobile ads is a good one though. The detailed stats behind campaigns would be interesting to see. 
Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Featured Video
Flash Poll
Upcoming Live Events
September 17-19, 2019, Dallas, Texas
October 1, 2019, New Orleans, Louisiana
October 2-22, 2019, Los Angeles, CA
October 10, 2019, New York, New York
November 5, 2019, London, England
November 7, 2019, London, UK
December 3-5, 2019, Vienna, Austria
December 3, 2019, New York, New York
All Upcoming Live Events
Partner Perspectives - content from our sponsors
Transform Beyond Borders to Lead the Innovation
By Ben Zhou, CEO, Whale Cloud
Reject Limits. Build the Future.
By David Wang, Huawei
China Telecom & Huawei Jointly Complete the World's First End-to-End 5G SA Voice & Video Call
By Jay Liu, Senior Marketing Manager, Cloud Core Product Line, Huawei Technologies
All Partner Perspectives