& cplSiteName &
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
SachinEE
SachinEE
2/27/2014 | 5:27:49 AM
Re : Taqua Lets Mobile Users Talk Over WiFi
Voice Servers! The age is changing from data servers to voice servers. I think it is better to use a separate installation of servers for voice over data than use existing server bands to have such an access. Also, the encryption procedures have to be different for voice (converted to token and then to digital signals) and would have to deliver more security.
SachinEE
SachinEE
2/27/2014 | 5:27:09 AM
Re : Taqua Lets Mobile Users Talk Over WiFi
Line (the app) does a similar thing, no? I think it is better but consumes a lot of data. Although the technical aspect of the technology might be more advanced than Line and is more consumer focused, I think Line has been doing the voice over the wi-fi without any troubles for some time.
Sarah Thomas
Sarah Thomas
2/25/2014 | 6:58:25 AM
Re: Confirmed to be Sprint
Another piece of the puzzle over WiFi calling at Sprint was revealed today. Kineto is working with Taqua to power the service. A spokesman says, "Kineto develops, integrates and tests the software that is embedded in each Sprint Android device to enable Wi-Fi Calling. Kineto's software redirects SMS and voice calls to the Sprint network via the Wi-Fi interface and the internet with no new application for Sprint's users to download and learn. It's all built right into the phone."

 See: http://www.lightreading.com/mobile/carrier-wifi/sprint-selects-kineto-for-wi-fi-calling/d/d-id/707905
Sarah Thomas
Sarah Thomas
2/21/2014 | 12:23:58 PM
Confirmed to be Sprint
Sprint confirmed its WiFi calling service today, so I think it's safe to say this is the deployment Taqua was referring to... https://community.sprint.com/baw/community/sprintblogs/announcements/blog/2014/02/21/sprint-launches-wi-fi-calling--expanding-voice-and-messaging-coverage
Mitch Wagner
Mitch Wagner
2/6/2014 | 11:59:03 AM
Re: OTT v. native
WarrenB - Ah, yes, of course. I should have realized you meant voice service. Yes, fewer people are using landlines, and that's a problem for cable companies looking to grow in that area (as well as telcos of course). 
WarrenB
WarrenB
2/6/2014 | 11:48:43 AM
Re: OTT v. native
@FakeMitch, the cord cutting I was referring to relates to the cable co.'s VoIP business. Ten years ago this was a growth business for cable companies as consumers switched from legacy landline to cheaper VoIP services offered by cable companies. But now between 1/3 and 1/2 of US households have no landline. ATT and Verizon can embrace this cord-cutting given their reliance on mobile, but the cable companies not so much.

OTT television services aren't yet as mature, but cable companies have more recently begun experiencing slow subscriber erosion in that segment as well. It seems likely this will accelerate going forward.   

  
Sarah Thomas
Sarah Thomas
2/6/2014 | 11:26:14 AM
Re: OTT v. native
Network selection can be set by operator policy, and users can also indicate their preferences they first time the log in, ie maybe the always want to default to WiFi in their home, but not elsewhere. As for the quality question, I think that remains to be seen. Cellular call quality is nothing to brag about, and I think VoIP can be better in a lot of cases. But, it still has its fair share of issues as well.
Mitch Wagner
Mitch Wagner
2/6/2014 | 11:22:24 AM
Re: OTT v. native
This looks like a great service. Takes some of the burden off mobile providers' strained data networks. 

Does the user perceive any difference between voice-over-WiFi and a conventional call? Is the voice quality any better? Does the user manually choose which network to use, or is that handled automatically?

 
Mitch Wagner
Mitch Wagner
2/6/2014 | 11:19:48 AM
Re: OTT v. native
WarrenB - Is cord-cutting in fact a significant actual threat to cable companies? The numbers I've seen indicate that cord-cutting is done by a small, but vocal, number of early adopters. 

OTOH, I've also seen reports that cable subscriptions are flat. That suggests few people are cutting the cord, but also few people who don't have the cord are having it connected. In other words: If you already have cable you're likely to keep it, but if you're just moving out of your parents' house to the first home of your own, you're likely not to get cable. In other words: The cable market is aging -- a bad place for a business to be. 
Sarah Thomas
Sarah Thomas
2/6/2014 | 11:03:37 AM
Re: OTT v. native
Sorry, I meant that the sessions are treated as data rather than voice, but not necessarily charged that way. It'd be up to the operator how to charge. THe Sprint leaks suggested it was a free service, but Taqua didn't confirm if that was who they are working with. 

I definitely agree that cable companies would be an good target market, especially with their increased interest in WiFi of late.
Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Featured Video
Upcoming Live Events
October 1-2, 2019, New Orleans, Louisiana
October 10, 2019, New York, New York
October 22, 2019, Los Angeles, CA
November 5, 2019, London, England
November 7, 2019, London, UK
November 14, 2019, Maritim Hotel, Berlin
December 3, 2019, New York, New York
December 3-5, 2019, Vienna, Austria
March 16-18, 2020, Embassy Suites, Denver, Colorado
May 18-20, 2020, Irving Convention Center, Dallas, TX
All Upcoming Live Events