x
<<   <   Page 5 / 13   >   >>
AAL6 12/4/2012 | 11:17:29 PM
re: Source: Cisco's HFR Tips the Scales Discussion is interesting and, by its nature, highly speculative.
I doubt that the people who were (or are) involved in decision making wrt HFR are reading these posts (maybe they are, but are understandably quiet).
So, that leaves us with people who were either somehow involved in this project in the past, or who heard about it through rumours or grapevine.

As this project has been going on for at least 6 years now, it is understandable that the speculations abound - this is probably the longest going stealth project in Cisco history. Wham little I know about the Cisco, this is extremely unnatural for their culture and way of management->that, to a degree, explains why there were so many false starts and layoffs (project in Cisco lasts about a year or so normally)

Are they going to survive it, I don't know.

Marketing and sales teams will sell (or at least try to) anything, but do customers really need something like this now (years after the "internet is doubling every xxx days" hype)?

p.s.
This message board is also a way for marketing types to feel the pulse and glean info on some issues without sacrificing their credibility or giving away any clues about the future product.
Let's make them happy ;)
jamesbond 12/4/2012 | 11:17:29 PM
re: Source: Cisco's HFR Tips the Scales Finally, it is a great thing that the crucial importance of the SW package was recognized, and it's here where the HFR might have the biggest impact

---------------------

Can you elaborate? What do you mean by importance
of SW package? Do you mean something like RPMs, Tar balls etc? I am just not sure what you are
implying.

thanks
signmeup 12/4/2012 | 11:17:28 PM
re: Source: Cisco's HFR Tips the Scales Tony DIDN'T hype Procket on this thread; someone asked him a specific question about Procket and he answered it. Period. In fact, Tony's comments show that there is a need for a clustered architecture.

Why would you be so concerned about discrediting Tony on a Cisco thread??? Perhaps you feel threatened?
Tony Li 12/4/2012 | 11:17:28 PM
re: Source: Cisco's HFR Tips the Scales
Desikar,

Two points: more of the 1Tb routers will just lead to the small switch penalty again.

Second, the point that I was trying to make is that with 100% growth, a system that is only 12x where we are today has a relatively short life span.

Tony
IP Observer 12/4/2012 | 11:17:28 PM
re: Source: Cisco's HFR Tips the Scales Who cares? Why is Tony Li spending so much time on message boards hyping his company? They aren't even mentioned in the article, yet he finds it necessary to turn it into Procket discussion. Procket's desperation is showing. Cisco or anyone else could care less about Procket.

Until you have a real deployment, focus on development.
andropat 12/4/2012 | 11:17:27 PM
re: Source: Cisco's HFR Tips the Scales Could not have said it better.. this is at least the 3rd or even 4th "router-related" article that has spawned discussions in which Tony Li offers his insight. I guess guys like Katz have much better things to do... they actually work on "real" product and produce "real" value.

Pat
AAL6 12/4/2012 | 11:17:26 PM
re: Source: Cisco's HFR Tips the Scales Again?
12monkeys 12/4/2012 | 11:17:26 PM
re: Source: Cisco's HFR Tips the Scales Hate to break this to everyone, but Cisco cancelled the HFR project months ago. This information is from various friends from within Cisco itself.
IP Observer 12/4/2012 | 11:17:25 PM
re: Source: Cisco's HFR Tips the Scales Did you ever think that the posters who bring up discussion about Procket in these message boards also work there? Look how quickly Tony is up on board responding to questions about Procket.

I could care less about Procket, just making an observation.

edgecore 12/4/2012 | 11:17:25 PM
re: Source: Cisco's HFR Tips the Scales We have heard this before, Is this true at all?

Can someone please shed some light?

THX

EC
<<   <   Page 5 / 13   >   >>
HOME
Sign In
SEARCH
CLOSE
MORE
CLOSE