x
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Michael Harris 12/5/2012 | 3:41:03 AM
re: Katherine Harris Crazy Pink sugar. That's classic.
The logic is like the Python shtick on the woman found to be a witch because she weighed the same as a duck, which floats, like wood, which of course is something that's meant to be burned.
Larry, Monkey 12/5/2012 | 3:41:04 AM
re: Katherine Harris Crazy Yes, alas, she should fit right in.
chip_mate 12/5/2012 | 3:41:05 AM
re: Katherine Harris Crazy monkey says:
"Adversity -- like total batshit insanity.
No impediment in the Sunshine State."

chip mate adds:
"...or the U.S. Senate"
cfaller 12/5/2012 | 3:41:06 AM
re: Katherine Harris Crazy On the political blogs, her nickname is "Pink Sugar," because she always gets a Starbucks coffee with 'pink sugar' in it.

The punchline? Well, the sugar is not literally pink, it's Sweet N' Low, and that's just what Katie calls it. Well, alrighty then...

Others have also commented that she is doing a Civil War reenactment, where she plays Sherman, and her campaign plays Atlanta...
Michael Harris 12/5/2012 | 3:41:09 AM
re: Katherine Harris Crazy Funny how the crazy members of the Harris family fail to understand that the founding fathers intentionally separated religion from government as a means to protect their faith. Talk about revisionist history.
burn0050 12/5/2012 | 3:41:11 AM
re: Katherine Harris Crazy Then we should return to the Flying Spaghetti Monster!!!

http://www.venganza.org/
issey 12/5/2012 | 3:41:16 AM
re: Katherine Harris Crazy should be " .. no christianity actions.."
issey 12/5/2012 | 3:41:16 AM
re: Katherine Harris Crazy Religion and politics certainly do not mix.
A crazy thief I'd say..

Noting that there is certainly christianity actions that can be seen in the various so called pre-emptive actions around the globe in the past 5 years..
paolo.franzoi 12/5/2012 | 3:41:17 AM
re: Katherine Harris Crazy
It's not crazy.

Louis XIV would have had similar thoughts. Not sure I am ready to return to the Great Chain of Being.

seven
burn0050 12/5/2012 | 3:41:18 AM
re: Katherine Harris Crazy "And if we are the ones not actively involved in electing those godly men and women," then "we're going to have a nation of secular laws. That's not what our Founding Fathers intended, and that certainly isn't what God intended."

Really?

"...an amendment was proposed by inserting the words, 'Jesus Christ...the holy author of our religion,' which was rejected 'By a great majority in proof that they meant to comprehend, within the mantle of its protection, the Jew and the Gentile, the Christian and the Mohammedan, the Hindoo and the Infidel of every denomination.'" - Thomas Jefferson

"During almost fifteen centuries has the legal establishment of Christianity been on trial. What have been its fruits? More or less in all places, pride and indolence in the Clergy, ignorance and servility in the laity; in both, superstition, bigotry and persecution."

"What influence, in fact, have ecclesiastical establishments had on society? In some instances they have been seen to erect a spiritual tyranny on the ruins of the civil authority; on many instances they have been seen upholding the thrones of political tyranny; in no instance have they been the guardians of the liberties of the people. Rulers who wish to subvert the public liberty may have found an established clergy convenient auxiliaries. A just government, instituted to secure and perpetuate it, needs them not." -and-
"Religion and government will both exist in greater purity, the less they are mixed together." - James Madison

John Adams signed the Treaty of Tripoli (June 7, 1797). Article 11 states:
"The government of the United States is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion."

The misquoting and misrepresentation founders on...
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
HOME
Sign In
SEARCH
CLOSE
MORE
CLOSE