Market Leader Programs
5G Transport - A 2023 Heavy Reading Survey
2023 Open RAN Operator Survey
Coherent Optics at 100G, 400G, and Beyond
Open RAN Platforms and Architectures Operator Survey
Cloud Native 5G Core Operator Survey
Bridging the Digital Divide
5G Network Slicing Operator Survey
Open, Automated & Programmable Transport
The Journey to Cloud Native
> companies which were little more than a few hot
> buzz words and a neat powerpoint presentation.
> That's why it's Volpi who's been benched. His
> job now is to teach industry press about new
> technologies. Those who can, do; those who
> can't, teach.
Come on, comparing to guys doing similar job at LU and NT Volpi's record is simply great.
Thanks,
Netskeptic
> That's why it's Volpi who's been benched
On the contrary, Volpi is being rotated around different groups within Cisco to train him as a potential successor to Chambers.
/ub
Hope that vendors of these switches will focus on providing the feature set that were promised by VoIP proponents.
Very nice sentiment, Mary. I suppose you are self educated and view the role of teacher as useless?
o I/O technology providers believe they have a losing hand. Partnering with monopolists may seem like their only choice. They will have no legacy and only severe pain ahead if they make this choice.
o SBC will be laying off many, many employees in order to try to become "competitive". Unfortunately, business cultures are not so easily changed and such an attempt is destined to fail.
o Technology providers and bit distributors have decided the only way to support their cost strucutures is to partner w/each other and then blindly support the pirating from the content refineries. Unfortunately, stealing from others is an economic system rife with conflict and does nothing to enable production.
One has to wonder how long it will be before many of the youthful executives are replaced with seasoned, grey haired, businessmen.
Mostly what you get from Cisco when they call on you is a boatload of arrogance. Looks like a big time retreat from the tried and true Cisco statement "IP is the answer, now what was the question?"
Cisco does not have in-house capability to develop Class 4 or Class 5 switches.
Cisco always portrys capabilities far more than it can deliver. Often timers Cisco's product do not satisfy the quality and feature requirements in most cases.
Cisco is not paying any attention to its fast swindling stocks. If the stock descends, Cisco even could go out of business.