Charlotte's Networks, Take 2

COMMENTS

Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View

Add Comment

<< < Page 17 / 26 > >>

brichter 12/4/2012 | 8:18:09 PM

re: Charlotte's Networks, Take 2 http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/01...
Look at the source.

Reply | Post Message | MESSAGES LIST | START A BOARD

brichter 12/4/2012 | 8:18:09 PM

re: Charlotte's Networks, Take 2 No shit. If I had ever done that stuff I wouldn't be asking somebody to interpret the data for me would I?

If you need the interpretation for something besides chewing the rag on a message board, maybe it's time to do the research yourself. There are publicly available RFCs on the subject, and quite a few good web pages, etc. Trying to get dnewman to comment asks him to jeopardize his credibility.

Reply | Post Message | MESSAGES LIST | START A BOARD

Lopez 12/4/2012 | 8:18:07 PM

re: Charlotte's Networks, Take 2 Since in the first test CWNT tested 3 months before the other guys I wonder if they had Charlotte's test results, such as they were, in front of them before they stated testing? Just currious.

You mean the ones where CWNT got mopped all over the floor? What for?

Reply | Post Message | MESSAGES LIST | START A BOARD

the_plumber 12/4/2012 | 8:18:05 PM

re: Charlotte's Networks, Take 2 skeptic wrote:
Were he to make the comments several people here are/were pressing him to make, to me that would be far worse than any of his (wrong) actions in
the original test.
---------------------

i guess the right move for would have been to just not write at all. once he started there was no eazy way out for him. (i almost feel sorry for the guy )

Reply | Post Message | MESSAGES LIST | START A BOARD

dishwasher 12/4/2012 | 8:18:02 PM

re: Charlotte's Networks, Take 2 with a lot of potential and some innovative visions, that seems to deliver. At least, for the first part. While it looks as if there is plenty of technological upside (TDM, clustering, QoS model, Aranea-2, ...)

David Newman is an integer tester with strong personal convictions.

Can we agree upon that?

Regards,

the Dishwasher.

Reply | Post Message | MESSAGES LIST | START A BOARD

silver740i 12/4/2012 | 8:17:51 PM

re: Charlotte's Networks, Take 2 Dear Skeptic:

Thank you very much for responding to me.

Its hard to believe that David Newman would do MPLS LSP test on original
test if the numbers were meaningless.

SO, I asked friend, who is expert in networking, and he told me LSP numbers
have nothing to do with software.
The LSP numbers indicate processing power of the machine - mainly CPU or
Asics.

Can somebody help me?

Reply | Post Message | MESSAGES LIST | START A BOARD

jerry33 12/4/2012 | 8:17:48 PM

re: Charlotte's Networks, Take 2 I would like to ask Mr. Newman why there was a three month gap between the test of CWNT and the tests of CISCO and JUNIPER at the first time?Wasn't they suppossed to show up all at the same time and if not why did you started with CWNT.

Reply | Post Message | MESSAGES LIST | START A BOARD

jerry33 12/4/2012 | 8:17:47 PM

re: Charlotte's Networks, Take 2 Another question if I may ask: If time is so importend why don't you conduct another test with maybee new players in the field? and why at the testing site the first page still anounces that juniper wins while maybee there will be someone else that will win? remmember it has been along time since the last test and all the companies improved thier machines.

Reply | Post Message | MESSAGES LIST | START A BOARD

jerry33 12/4/2012 | 8:17:47 PM

re: Charlotte's Networks, Take 2 Why did you started with them three month earlier?

Reply | Post Message | MESSAGES LIST | START A BOARD

dishwasher 12/4/2012 | 8:17:47 PM

re: Charlotte's Networks, Take 2 FWIW "CW apparently now has 6 betas going.... one with Deutche Telecom.... hmmmmm...where did i see that name recently?"

Reply | Post Message | MESSAGES LIST | START A BOARD

<< < Page 17 / 26 > >>