x
Page 1 / 3   >   >>
joset01 12/5/2012 | 5:41:22 PM
re: AT&T Boss Calls for End to Mobile-Video Babel

I've seen Ralph speak numerous times now. I don't think I've ever seen him quite as animated as on the topic of mobile video/fueling the cycle.

joset01 12/5/2012 | 5:41:21 PM
re: AT&T Boss Calls for End to Mobile-Video Babel

I suspect they're coming round to a more standards-based approach now because the OTT players are eating into revenues that the carriers see as potentially theirs. I doubt AT&T ever held Apple or any other vendor to video standards because they weren't far-sighted enough to see the video future.

krishanguru143 12/5/2012 | 5:41:21 PM
re: AT&T Boss Calls for End to Mobile-Video Babel

There has been a standard for video calls for over 6 years now.  The carriers have let the manufacturers get away with not supporting the existing one and creating their own.  AT&T could have forced Apple to support he standard, they did not.  All it takes is putting the requirement out there and when Apple submits a new model for testing, you fail it.


 


The AT&T network doesn't even support/allow the video calling standard.  So while blaming the manufacturers doesn't help when the network is also to blame.

joset01 12/5/2012 | 5:41:20 PM
re: AT&T Boss Calls for End to Mobile-Video Babel

Well, the horse is well and truly out of the gate by now, but all the big carrier cheeses on stage were talking about OTT today, too late for a proper standard now?

krishanguru143 12/5/2012 | 5:41:20 PM
re: AT&T Boss Calls for End to Mobile-Video Babel

They weren't and that is obvious by not supporting the standard set forth by GSM.  First commercial handset was available in 2006.


 


Maybe they haven't figured out how to bill it?  Would the video call count towards the tiered data plans, would it be the same as a voice call or something different?  I could see issues going between carriers, but not to implement it at all, different story.

krishanguru143 12/5/2012 | 5:41:19 PM
re: AT&T Boss Calls for End to Mobile-Video Babel

Yes and no.  OTT has no QoS, the video calling standard does; just like a voice call.  All it would be is taking the existing API's in the OS and letting the apps initiate the call.  This would require the use of phone numbers rather than just an ID though.  The individual services could handle the translation; you would just need to provide them your phone number.  So it can be done, but the reason why it won't, Apple likes to be in control.  They want everything closed, so maybe the rest of the industry should get together and lock Apple out entirely.

joset01 12/5/2012 | 5:41:16 PM
re: AT&T Boss Calls for End to Mobile-Video Babel

AT&T posted a snippet of de la Vega on site in Barcelona but I can't find a video of the speech proper anywhere:


 


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...


 


Glad you liked the piece.


Dan

scottwhaton 12/5/2012 | 5:41:16 PM
re: AT&T Boss Calls for End to Mobile-Video Babel

It doesn't take a crystal ball to understand that if the mobile operators let video conferencing slip away, they also let voice (as a subset) slip away too.  And that would be a shame as the mobile operators still have some formidible advantages vs. the OTT players including providing QoS, an easy to dial address (a phone number) and the abiity to supply an interoperable service between the different video islands.  


 


Glad to hear AT&T not only become a proponent of this message but get to the front of the line.  


 


Scott Wharton


CEO


Vidtel, Inc.

scottwhaton 12/5/2012 | 5:41:16 PM
re: AT&T Boss Calls for End to Mobile-Video Babel

Dan,


 


Thanks for the informative post.  Was there a video of the speech that those of us not fortunately enough to be in Barcelona can watch?


 


Scott

Pete Baldwin 12/5/2012 | 5:41:12 PM
re: AT&T Boss Calls for End to Mobile-Video Babel

Cisco wants to have the network (i.e. Videoscape) become the mobile-video babelfish.


That would solve the problem, right? Maybe they just haven't had a chance to tell AT&T about it yet.  :)  Or... maybe this is a sign AT&T doesn't want to be that beholden to any one vendor...

Page 1 / 3   >   >>
HOME
Sign In
SEARCH
CLOSE
MORE
CLOSE