x
krbabu 12/5/2012 | 3:15:18 PM
re: Application/XML-Aware Networks [email protected]:
Sorry, I didn't see your response to my entry until today. I don't know if there is mechanism in Lightreading.com to subscribe to responses to one's posts.
Anyway, selection between SLA/non-SLA applications happens even today bases on the TCP/UDP ports. In the future, we can see a much more discriminating schemes to provide the SLA/non-SLA dichotomy.
-
Ramesh
krbabu 12/5/2012 | 4:08:53 AM
re: Application/XML-Aware Networks This is a very good article to provide a solid introduction to the subject. However, distinguishing a global IP network from the global Internet is extremely important.

The global Internet of today is an IP network all right, but without any sort of guaranteed performance. The global Internet of tomorrow will have some of its sections engineered to provide well-defined SLAs; see story on BellSouth's plans at http://www.lightreading.com/do.... And, specialized applications such as VoIP, VoD, Application-aware networking, etc. will for the most part ride the SLAed portions; e-mail, casual browsing, etc. will ride the SLA-less portions.
-
Ramesh
[email protected] 12/5/2012 | 4:08:47 AM
re: Application/XML-Aware Networks Ramesh

"And, specialized applications such as VoIP, VoD, Application-aware networking, etc. will for the most part ride the SLAed portions; e-mail, casual browsing, etc. will ride the SLA-less portions."

Would Application-aware networking become a way of automatically selecting the appropriate SLA/non-SLA portion?

[email protected]
standardsarefun 12/5/2012 | 4:08:44 AM
re: Application/XML-Aware Networks See RFC3252 (dated 1 April 2002) entitled "Binary Lexical Octet Ad-hoc Transport" (see http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc325....

In particular the wonderful analysis under section 2 concerning IPoXML



HOME
Sign In
SEARCH
CLOSE
MORE
CLOSE