& cplSiteName &
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
mendyk
50%
50%
mendyk,
User Rank: Light Sabre
8/28/2013 | 10:34:20 AM
Re: Operators will sure consider capacity & MTBF
Sure, and a ride on Light Reading's prototype robot zebra drone would help seal the deal. For emerging products that have little or no field track record, MTBF claims would come from... the suppliers. Caveat emptor on that.
AmirB52
100%
0%
AmirB52,
User Rank: Lightning
8/28/2013 | 10:18:29 AM
Re: Operators will sure consider capacity & MTBF
As a mobile operator, I am surprised that the report (and comments here) ignore the most significant factor for us network operators with regards to backhaul: site visits. Every visit is an operational nightmare, and it is crucial for us to minimize them as much as possible. It's not only the cost and resources (a site visit may amount to as much as 25% of the backhaul gear cost), but also a wake up call to all those living or working nearby afflicted with radiation phobia.  Therefore, our primary goal is: install and forget about it for as long as possible. To this end, the most important specifications of candidate solutions are: capacity and MTBF. Yet this report completely ignores these two crucial specs. Add this to your report and we might consider buying it!!!
Vitesse Semiconductor
50%
50%
Vitesse Semiconductor,
User Rank: Lightning
8/27/2013 | 6:54:05 PM
Operators must also consider timing requirements
Michelle is absolutely correct in noting that operators must be careful when choosing which backhaul strategies to employ, as they seek to improve coverage and capacity while maintaining user QoS and operating within CAPEX constraints. One factor influencing their decisions will be the increasingly stringent 4G/LTE timing requirements. Specifically, the frequency synchronization and time-of-day synchronization that these 4G/LTE/LTE-Advanced networks demand. Meeting these timing requirements across complex backhaul networks becomes even more difficult when dealing with wireless backhaul for outdoor, public access small cells, where everything from varying modulation formats to changing weather can alter latency in microwave spans. Small cell network use of IEEE1588v2 will be instrumental in meeting such challenges. Especially in urban canyons or indoor environments where GPS-based timing is not viable, strategic use of 1588 backhaul timing architectures will make small cell backhaul truly viable.
pdonegan67
50%
50%
pdonegan67,
User Rank: Light Sabre
8/27/2013 | 5:14:47 AM
Re: Short lived gold rush
Re "It would be great if Light Reading can host a vendor bakeoff".

I agree.

However the trouble is that the established microwave vendors would have little incentive to pay for it because backhaul solutions for small cells are just "one club in their kitbag", so to speak. There's nothing special about small cell backhaul if you're Ceragon or Aviat or NEC or Ericsson. Talking with customers about these issues, and bringing the right solutions to them at the right time, is just another day at the office.

As for the start-ups, hardly any of them would be able to fund such a bake-off. This is because mundane business model issues such as site acquisition are still at least as big a barrier to public access small cell adoption as the price/performance of the backhaul pipes; because there still aren't any small cell backhaul equipment orders out there worth speaking of; and because whenever the first sizable orders do start to materialize the CFOs in most of those start-ups know by now - don't they? - that the scale of the margin give-away needed to win those deals will be enough to turn their bowels to water.
allip
50%
50%
allip,
User Rank: Light Beer
8/25/2013 | 1:04:41 PM
Re: Short lived gold rush
I agree with Patrick, regarding most companies having only ketchup and not the secret sauce. Majority of them are wrapper around Qualcomm (designart or atheros) chipset.

Looking at the list of companies in the report, i can't see any of the companies listed in the report having done some innovation or provide a solution for SCB except few. Most of them are repackaging their eixisting LoS backhaul product for smalller size. I except most innovation to have happen in mmWave and Sub 6Ghz NLoS products.


It would be great if lightreading can host a vendor backeoff...

Airspan : No innovative backhaul, primarirly access packaged with canned qcom platform

Alcatel: Reselling

Aviat:  Reselling

CBNL:  Good form factor, if LoS available for SCB

Ceragon: Reselling

Dragownave; NLoS product only to fill portfolio, avenue lite looks like atheros based solution.

Ericsson: Have some good form factor 60GHz, NloS:Reselling

Huwawei: TD-LTE backhaul, very low

Intracom: Good form factor, if LoS available for SCB

NEC: No SCB offering, except LoS 60 GHz

ZTE: No new product

 
pdonegan67
50%
50%
pdonegan67,
User Rank: Light Sabre
8/23/2013 | 1:48:55 PM
Re: Short lived gold rush
A couple will be acquired, no doubt. But I'd expect most to re-orient themselves towards other applications besides mobile backhaul or quietly expire without trace. And some sooner rather than later too.
DanJones
50%
50%
DanJones,
User Rank: Blogger
8/23/2013 | 1:13:16 PM
Re: Short lived gold rush
So Patrick, you think none of these startups are an acquisition target or, snicker, IPO candidate?
pdonegan67
50%
50%
pdonegan67,
User Rank: Light Sabre
8/23/2013 | 4:12:24 AM
Short lived gold rush
Most gold rushes at least have the merit of lasting a while. This one's coming to an end almost as soon as it's started. Most of the start-ups in this space have little or nothing that the bigger microwave-focused players and major OEMs couldn't turn around themselves within 12 months as soon as an operator is ready to place a decent sized order. Most of the start-ups in this space don't have any secret sauce - all they have is ketchup.
Kishore Karnam
50%
50%
Kishore Karnam,
User Rank: Light Beer
8/22/2013 | 8:29:26 PM
Re: Having a hard time picturing the wired options
WiMAX is also an option for wireless backhaul.
mkelley@openran.com
50%
50%
[email protected],
User Rank: Light Beer
8/22/2013 | 6:35:33 PM
Re: Having a hard time picturing the wired options
Carol - Absolutely right.  There will clearly need to be a combination of fiber and wireless solutions in general, but for outdoor "nomadic" areas only wireless will provide carriers and MSOs with flexibility to place small-cells assets in ideal locations for either LTE (rel 8/10/12) or 11ac offload. As one analyst put it recently during a discussion of the virtues of only fiber for backhaul of small cells -"why not just run fiber to the handset?" 
Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Featured Video
Flash Poll
Upcoming Live Events
September 17-19, 2019, Dallas, Texas
October 1, 2019, New Orleans, Louisiana
October 2-22, 2019, Los Angeles, CA
October 10, 2019, New York, New York
November 5, 2019, London, England
November 7, 2019, London, UK
December 3-5, 2019, Vienna, Austria
December 3, 2019, New York, New York
All Upcoming Live Events
Partner Perspectives - content from our sponsors
Transform Beyond Borders to Lead the Innovation
By Ben Zhou, CEO, Whale Cloud
Reject Limits. Build the Future.
By David Wang, Huawei
China Telecom & Huawei Jointly Complete the World's First End-to-End 5G SA Voice & Video Call
By Jay Liu, Senior Marketing Manager, Cloud Core Product Line, Huawei Technologies
All Partner Perspectives